IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jworld/v3y2022i1p2-66d722955.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing a Nation’s Competitiveness in Global Food Innovation: Creating a Global Food Innovation Index

Author

Listed:
  • Sylvain Charlebois

    (Agri-Food Analytics Lab, Dalhousie University, 6100 University Avenue, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada)

  • Amy Hill

    (Agri-Food Analytics Lab, Dalhousie University, 6100 University Avenue, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada)

  • Janèle Vezeau

    (Agri-Food Analytics Lab, Dalhousie University, 6100 University Avenue, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada)

  • Lydia Hunsberger

    (Agri-Food Analytics Lab, Dalhousie University, 6100 University Avenue, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada)

  • Maddy Johnston

    (Agri-Food Analytics Lab, Dalhousie University, 6100 University Avenue, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada)

  • Janet Music

    (Agri-Food Analytics Lab, Dalhousie University, 6100 University Avenue, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada)

Abstract

While food innovation is heavily influenced by the myriad of policies, regulations and other environmental factors within a country, globalization means that food innovation is also a matter of international competitiveness. This benchmarking exercise uses 24 variables to compare the different innovation environments across ten countries: Canada, the US, Mexico, the UK, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Japan, and Australia. Quantitative and qualitative data was collected from publicly available sources only to measure each variable and ultimately provide a ranking. Qualitative data was evaluated using thematic coding to establish baseline practices and then compare each country to the baseline. Quantitative data was evaluated by constructing an average to which each country was compared. Countries whose data showed they met the average were awarded two points, and those who performed above or below average were either awarded an additional point or saw a point deducted. A final ranking was established from the scores across all four pillars, and the ranking was weighted to account for lacking data. The final weighted ranking saw the UK rank first, followed by the US, Germany, Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, Japan, Mexico, France and finally, Italy in tenth place.

Suggested Citation

  • Sylvain Charlebois & Amy Hill & Janèle Vezeau & Lydia Hunsberger & Maddy Johnston & Janet Music, 2022. "Assessing a Nation’s Competitiveness in Global Food Innovation: Creating a Global Food Innovation Index," World, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-40, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:3:y:2022:i:1:p:2-66:d:722955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/3/1/2/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/3/1/2/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marina Knickel & Sabine Neuberger & Laurens Klerkx & Karlheinz Knickel & Gianluca Brunori & Helmut Saatkamp, 2021. "Strengthening the Role of Academic Institutions and Innovation Brokers in Agri-Food Innovation: Towards Hybridisation in Cross-Border Cooperation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Lana Vanderlee & Sahar Goorang & Kimiya Karbasy & Stefanie Vandevijvere & Mary R L’Abbé, 2019. "Policies to Create Healthier Food Environments in Canada: Experts’ Evaluation and Prioritized Actions Using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-17, November.
    3. DeMaria, Federica & Zezza, Annalisa, 2020. "Drivers and barriers of process innovation in the EU manufacturing food processing industry: exploring the role of energy policies," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 9(1), April.
    4. Choi, Bong-Geun & Choi, Jung Ho & Malik, Sara, 2020. "Job Search with Financial Information: Theory and Evidence," Research Papers 3924, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    5. Haroon Qasim & Liang Yan & Rui Guo & Amer Saeed & Badar Nadeem Ashraf, 2019. "The Defining Role of Environmental Self-Identity among Consumption Values and Behavioral Intention to Consume Organic Food," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Morais, Ana Catarina & Ishida, Akira & Matsuda, Ruriko, 2024. "Ethical food consumption drivers in Japan. A S–O-R framework application using PLS-SEM with a MGA assessment based on clustering," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    2. Umar Nawaz Kayani & Anamul Haque & Umme Kulsum & Nishat Taslin Mohona & Fakhrul Hasan, 2023. "Modeling the Antecedents of Green Consumption Values to Promote the Green Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Tanita Northcott & Mark Lawrence & Christine Parker & Phillip Baker, 2023. "Ecological regulation for healthy and sustainable food systems: responding to the global rise of ultra-processed foods," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 1333-1358, September.
    4. Chakraborty, Debarun & Paul, Justin, 2023. "Healthcare apps’ purchase intention: A consumption values perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    5. Yingxiu Hong & Abdullah Al Mamun & Mohammad Masukujjaman & Qing Yang, 2024. "Sustainable consumption practices among Chinese youth," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Yu-Shan Chen & Tai-Wei Chang & Hung-Xin Li & Ying-Rong Chen, 2020. "The Influence of Green Brand Affect on Green Purchase Intentions: The Mediation Effects of Green Brand Associations and Green Brand Attitude," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Ahsan Akbar & Saqib Ali & Muhammad Azeem Ahmad & Minhas Akbar & Muhammad Danish, 2019. "Understanding the Antecedents of Organic Food Consumption in Pakistan: Moderating Role of Food Neophobia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Neiba Neiba & N. Tejmani Singh, 2024. "Effect of Green Marketing, Green Consumption Values and Green Marketing Approaches on Organic Purchase Intention: Evidence from the Manipur," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 14(5), pages 18-31, September.
    9. Susan Caswell & Patti-Jean Naylor & Dana Olstad & Sara Kirk & Louise Mâsse & Kim Raine & Rhona Hanning, 2021. "Recreation Facility Food and Beverage Environments in Ontario, Canada: An Appeal for Policy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-15, August.
    10. Michał Bilczak, 2021. "Crisis diagnosis in cross-border region: lessons from the pandemic," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 9(2), pages 223-237, December.
    11. Lin Zhu & Brychko Alina, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis of Research Hotspots and Trends in the Transformation and Development of Agricultural Enterprises," Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, Sciendo, vol. 45(4), pages 438-452, December.
    12. Binh Nguyen & Leonie Cranney & Bill Bellew & Margaret Thomas, 2021. "Implementing Food Environment Policies at Scale: What Helps? What Hinders? A Systematic Review of Barriers and Enablers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-15, September.
    13. Goh, Choon Fu & Long, Chiau Ming & Humaira Fedelis, Nur Aisyah & Hamdan, Halimaton & Chuah, Soo Cheng & Yeo, Sook Fern & Tan, Cheng Ling & Wong, Tin Wui, 2023. "Critical insights of nano-based pharmaceutical, cosmeceutical and nutraceutical products: Empirical evidence from the consumption values perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    14. Wenhao Song & Jie Deng & Fangfang Zhang & Xuerong Peng & Xiangdong Jin, 2024. "Activating employee pro-environmental behavior in the workplace: the effects of environmental self-identity and behavioral integrity," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 1-27, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:3:y:2022:i:1:p:2-66:d:722955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.