IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jtourh/v6y2025i1p36-d1596759.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial Intelligence in Tourism Through Chatbot Support in the Booking Process—An Experimental Investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Kirsten Wüst

    (Department of Quantitative Methods, Faculty of Economics and Law, Hochschule Pforzheim, 75175 Pforzheim, Germany)

  • Kerstin Bremser

    (Department of International Business, Faculty of Economics and Law, Hochschule Pforzheim, 75175 Pforzheim, Germany)

Abstract

AI-controlled chatbots have been used in travel services for some time and range from simple hotel reservations to personalized travel recommendations. However, the acceptance of chatbots compared to human interlocutors has not yet been extensively studied experimentally in the tourism context. In this experimental, randomized, vignette-based, preregistered 2 (agent: AI chatbot/human counterpart) × 3 (situation: positive/neutral/negative) between-subjects design, we hypothesized that booking intention is reduced in chatbots compared to human agents and in situations where the booking can only be made under more negative than the original conditions. Additionally, we hypothesized an interaction effect between agent and situation, presuming that the decrease in booking intention in negative situations would be less strong for human agents than for chatbots. Structural equation modelling of the data indicates strong support for the Technology Acceptance Model in the booking context. As presumed, the booking intention was lower in the negative situation and borderline lower for the chatbot. The interaction effect was shown descriptively in the data. Chatbots are recognized during the booking process and less accepted to support bookings than their human counterparts. Therefore, managers should design chatbots as human-like as possible to avoid losing sales when outsourcing customer contact activities to AI technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Kirsten Wüst & Kerstin Bremser, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence in Tourism Through Chatbot Support in the Booking Process—An Experimental Investigation," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jtourh:v:6:y:2025:i:1:p:36-:d:1596759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5768/6/1/36/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5768/6/1/36/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kristin Jürkenbeck & Andreas Heumann & Achim Spiller, 2019. "Sustainability Matters: Consumer Acceptance of Different Vertical Farming Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-21, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yiming Shao & Zhugen Wang & Zhiwei Zhou & Haojing Chen & Yuanlong Cui & Zhenghuan Zhou, 2022. "Determinants Affecting Public Intention to Use Micro-Vertical Farming: A Survey Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.
    2. Garrett M. Broad & Wythe Marschall & Maya Ezzeddine, 2022. "Perceptions of high-tech controlled environment agriculture among local food consumers: using interviews to explore sense-making and connections to good food," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(1), pages 417-433, March.
    3. Hemeng Zhou & Kathrin Specht & Caitlin K. Kirby, 2022. "Consumers’ and Stakeholders’ Acceptance of Indoor Agritecture in Shanghai (China)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-28, February.
    4. Marini, Michele & Caro, Dario & Thomsen, Marianne, 2023. "Investigating local policy instruments for different types of urban agriculture in four European cities: A case study analysis on the use and effectiveness of the applied policy instruments," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    5. Macht, Janine & Klink-Lehmann, Jeanette & Hartmann, Monika, 2023. "Don't forget the locals: Understanding citizens' acceptance of bio-based technologies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    6. Aleksander Grzelak & Jakub Staniszewski & Michał Borychowski, 2020. "Income or Assets—What Determines the Approach to the Environment among Farmers in A Region in Poland?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Adrián Csordás & István Füzesi, 2023. "The Impact of Technophobia on Vertical Farms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, May.
    8. Caixia Ivy Gan & Ruth Soukoutou & Denise Maria Conroy, 2022. "Sustainability Framing of Controlled Environment Agriculture and Consumer Perceptions: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Mina, Giorgio & Peira, Giovanni & Bonadonna, Alessandro, 2023. "Public perception and social sustainability of indoor farming technologies: A systematic review," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    10. Mark Bomford, 2023. "More bytes per acre: do vertical farming’s land sparing promises stand on solid ground?," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 879-895, September.
    11. Volkmar Keuter & Sebastian Deck & Heidi Giesenkamp & Denise Gonglach & Victor Takazi Katayama & Sica Liesegang & Finn Petersen & Sandra Schwindenhammer & Heidrun Steinmetz & Andreas Ulbrich, 2021. "Significance and Vision of Nutrient Recovery for Sustainable City Food Systems in Germany by 2050," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-23, September.
    12. Wilmes, Rolf & Waldhof, Gabi & Breunig, Peter, 2022. "Can digital farming technologies enhance the willingness to buy products from current farming systems?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 17(11), pages 1-20.
    13. Dsouza, Ajwal & Newman, Lenore & Graham, Thomas & Fraser, Evan D.G., 2023. "Exploring the landscape of controlled environment agriculture research: A systematic scoping review of trends and topics," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jtourh:v:6:y:2025:i:1:p:36-:d:1596759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.