IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i6p902-d99788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Are Naturally Ventilated Office Spaces Not Popular in New Zealand?

Author

Listed:
  • Eziaku Onyeizu Rasheed

    (School of Engineering and Advanced Technology, Massey University, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand)

  • Hugh Byrd

    (School of Architecture, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK)

  • Blair Money

    (Focus Construction Group, Auckland 0610, New Zealand)

  • Jasper Mbachu

    (School of Engineering and Advanced Technology, Massey University, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand)

  • Temtiope Egbelakin

    (School of Engineering and Advanced Technology, Massey University, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand)

Abstract

In this paper, we investigated the reason(s) why natural ventilation is not as popular as air-conditioned or mixed-mode ventilation systems in Green-rated office buildings in New Zealand. To achieve this, we had three objectives. Firstly, we reviewed the Green Star criteria for thermal comfort in office buildings to ascertain which ventilation system the NZ Green Star rating tool promotes. Secondly, we ascertained the perception of occupants in office buildings regarding thermal comfort. This was followed by an interview with building experts regarding factors that affect the use of natural ventilation in New Zealand offices. The findings showed that the NZ Green Star thermal comfort criteria encourage the use of mechanical ventilation over natural ventilation which results in designers opting for air conditioning systems in office designs. We observed that occupants of naturally ventilated spaces were least satisfied with the thermal comfort of their offices when compared with occupants of mixed-mode and air-conditioned offices. This study fulfils the need to encourage the use of natural ventilation in office environments by designers and building owners. Further study on other aspects of the indoor environment quality that is related to naturally ventilated systems such as lighting and noise is required in a bid to ascertain its viability in office environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Eziaku Onyeizu Rasheed & Hugh Byrd & Blair Money & Jasper Mbachu & Temtiope Egbelakin, 2017. "Why Are Naturally Ventilated Office Spaces Not Popular in New Zealand?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-16, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:902-:d:99788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/902/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/902/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jasper Mbachu, 2011. "Sources of contractor’s payment risks and cash flow problems in the New Zealand construction industry: project team’s perceptions of the risks and mitigation measures," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(10), pages 1027-1041.
    2. Singh, A. & Syal, M. & Grady, S.C. & Korkmaz, S., 2010. "Effects of green buildings on employee health and productivity," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(9), pages 1665-1668.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lazaros Mavromatidis, 2022. "Constructal Evaluation of Polynomial Meta-Models for Dynamic Thermal Absorptivity Forecasting for Mixed-Mode nZEB Heritage Building Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Tien, Paige Wenbin & Wei, Shuangyu & Liu, Tianshu & Calautit, John & Darkwa, Jo & Wood, Christopher, 2021. "A deep learning approach towards the detection and recognition of opening of windows for effective management of building ventilation heat losses and reducing space heating demand," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 603-625.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hye Gi Kim & Sun Sook Kim, 2020. "Occupants’ Awareness of and Satisfaction with Green Building Technologies in a Certified Office Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Hugh Byrd & Eziaku Onyeizu Rasheed, 2016. "The Productivity Paradox in Green Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-12, April.
    3. Chengju Wang & Juan Wang & Dan Norbäck, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Associations between Energy Use, Fuel Poverty, Energy Efficiency Improvements and Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-29, June.
    4. Shi, Qian & Lai, Xiaodong & Xie, Xin & Zuo, Jian, 2014. "Assessment of green building policies – A fuzzy impact matrix approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 203-211.
    5. Georgopoulou, E. & Mirasgedis, S. & Sarafidis, Y. & Gakis, N. & Hontou, V. & Lalas, D.P. & Steiner, D. & Tuerk, A. & Fruhmann, C. & Pucker, J., 2015. "Lessons learnt from a sectoral analysis of greenhouse gas mitigation potential in the Balkans," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P3), pages 577-591.
    6. Zhengzhen Tan & Siqi Zheng & Juan Palacios & Carl Hooks, 2021. "Market Adoption of Healthy Buildings in the Office Sector: A Global Study from the Owner's Perspective," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 24(2), pages 253-292.
    7. Taedong Lee & Chris Koski, 2012. "Building Green: Local Political Leadership Addressing Climate Change," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 29(5), pages 605-624, September.
    8. Maryam Khoshbakht & Zhonghua Gou & Xiaohuan Xie & Baojie He & Amos Darko, 2018. "Green Building Occupant Satisfaction: Evidence from the Australian Higher Education Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    9. Prescott C. Ensign & Shawn Roy & Tom Brzustowski, 2021. "Decisions by Key Office Building Stakeholders to Build or Retrofit Green in Toronto’s Urban Core," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-31, June.
    10. Jingfeng Yuan & Wen Yi & Mengyi Miao & Lei Zhang, 2018. "Evaluating the Impacts of Health, Social Network and Capital on Craft Efficiency and Productivity: A Case Study of Construction Workers in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-25, February.
    11. Pleasa Serin Abraham & Haripriya Gundimeda, 2020. "Greening offices: Willingness to pay for green-certified office spaces in Bengaluru, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 1839-1857, March.
    12. Mallory Elise Flowers & Daniel C. Matisoff & Douglas S. Noonan, 2020. "In the LEED: Racing to the Top in Environmental Self‐Regulation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2842-2856, September.
    13. James Olabode Bamidele Rotimi & Eziaku Onyeizu Rasheed, 2024. "The “Other” Workplace Design Factors: An Insight into What New Zealand Workers Want," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-23, September.
    14. Hasan Mahmoud & Vian Ahmed & Salwa Beheiry, 2021. "Construction Cash Flow Risk Index," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Daniel C. Matisoff & Douglas S. Noonan & Mallory E. Flowers, 2016. "Policy Monitor—Green Buildings: Economics and Policies," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 10(2), pages 329-346.
    16. Amit Kant Kaushik & Mohammed Arif & Matt M. G. Syal & Muhammad Qasim Rana & Olugbenga Timo Oladinrin & Ahlam Ammar Sharif & Ala’a Saleh Alshdiefat, 2022. "Effect of Indoor Environment on Occupant Air Comfort and Productivity in Office Buildings: A Response Surface Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, November.
    17. Nadia Abdulghaffar, 2017. "Green Workplace Behaviour in Saudi Arabia: The Case of EnviroCo," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(1), pages 19-28, March.
    18. M. Esther García-Buades & José M. Peiró & María Isabel Montañez-Juan & Malgorzata W. Kozusznik & Silvia Ortiz-Bonnín, 2019. "Happy-Productive Teams and Work Units: A Systematic Review of the ‘Happy-Productive Worker Thesis’," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-39, December.
    19. Deepak Bangwal & Prakash Tiwari & Pankaj Chamola, 2017. "Workplace Design Features, Job Satisfaction, and Organization Commitment," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, July.
    20. Ioannis Vardopoulos & Ioannis Vannas & George Xydis & Constantinos Vassiliades, 2023. "Homeowners’ Perceptions of Renewable Energy and Market Value of Sustainable Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-18, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:902-:d:99788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.