IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i19p8381-d1486450.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The “Other” Workplace Design Factors: An Insight into What New Zealand Workers Want

Author

Listed:
  • James Olabode Bamidele Rotimi

    (School of Built Environment, Massey University, Auckland 0632, New Zealand)

  • Eziaku Onyeizu Rasheed

    (School of Built Environment, Massey University, Auckland 0632, New Zealand)

Abstract

The recent COVID-19 pandemic has led to a reassessment of workplace necessities. It has resulted in the current shift from traditional workplace design to creating work experiences—a new paradigm in workplace management. Hence, while some conventional workplace factors remain important to the experiences of workers and, thus, to their well-being, comfort, and productivity, recent studies suggest other factors, not widely known, as important in creating the appropriate work experience. Our study explores these other factors in the workplace that contribute to or may be very important to, workers’ comfort, well-being and productivity. These include working mode; facilities; sustainability practices; and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)—cultural connection. A sample of 149 occupants across offices in New Zealand was conveniently collected for the study and analysed using descriptive and content analysis in SPSS v24. The results show that the occupants prefer to have private offices in the workplace and separate meeting rooms for better concentration on work. In terms of working mode, a combined model of remote working and in-office working is preferred. Furthermore, occupants prefer to have access control and fire safety systems essentially in the workplace and for their offices to be cleaned daily. For sustainable measures in the workplace, the respondents choose the following as practical and convenient: turning off computers outside work hours, using more LED light bulbs in the office, opening windows and doors when required, and using a motion sensor lighting system. Interestingly, most of the respondents did not think having a cultural connection in their workplace was important. The study findings represent significant progress in identifying the needs of contemporary office workers. These findings assist facility managers and workplace designers in developing more proactive approaches to anticipated user issues in buildings.

Suggested Citation

  • James Olabode Bamidele Rotimi & Eziaku Onyeizu Rasheed, 2024. "The “Other” Workplace Design Factors: An Insight into What New Zealand Workers Want," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-23, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8381-:d:1486450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8381/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/19/8381/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sedina Kalender Smajlović & Andreja Kukec & Mateja Dovjak, 2019. "Association between Sick Building Syndrome and Indoor Environmental Quality in Slovenian Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Abigail Opoku Mensah, 2019. "Does Culture Play a Role at Work? Examining the Relationships Among Sociocultural Values, Job Satisfaction, and Social Support as a Mediator," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440198, February.
    3. Singh, A. & Syal, M. & Grady, S.C. & Korkmaz, S., 2010. "Effects of green buildings on employee health and productivity," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(9), pages 1665-1668.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hye Gi Kim & Sun Sook Kim, 2020. "Occupants’ Awareness of and Satisfaction with Green Building Technologies in a Certified Office Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Hugh Byrd & Eziaku Onyeizu Rasheed, 2016. "The Productivity Paradox in Green Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-12, April.
    3. Hanizah Mohd Yusoff & Vevya Sundaram & Hanani Nabilah Mohd Sobri & Nor Ba’yah Abdul Kadir, 2022. "A Grounded Theory Study on the Intention to Work While Ill among Workers with Musculoskeletal Disorders: An In-Depth Understanding of Workers’ Experiences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Chengju Wang & Juan Wang & Dan Norbäck, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Associations between Energy Use, Fuel Poverty, Energy Efficiency Improvements and Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-29, June.
    5. Shi, Qian & Lai, Xiaodong & Xie, Xin & Zuo, Jian, 2014. "Assessment of green building policies – A fuzzy impact matrix approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 203-211.
    6. Georgopoulou, E. & Mirasgedis, S. & Sarafidis, Y. & Gakis, N. & Hontou, V. & Lalas, D.P. & Steiner, D. & Tuerk, A. & Fruhmann, C. & Pucker, J., 2015. "Lessons learnt from a sectoral analysis of greenhouse gas mitigation potential in the Balkans," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P3), pages 577-591.
    7. Zhengzhen Tan & Siqi Zheng & Juan Palacios & Carl Hooks, 2021. "Market Adoption of Healthy Buildings in the Office Sector: A Global Study from the Owner's Perspective," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 24(2), pages 253-292.
    8. Taedong Lee & Chris Koski, 2012. "Building Green: Local Political Leadership Addressing Climate Change," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 29(5), pages 605-624, September.
    9. Maryam Khoshbakht & Zhonghua Gou & Xiaohuan Xie & Baojie He & Amos Darko, 2018. "Green Building Occupant Satisfaction: Evidence from the Australian Higher Education Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Prescott C. Ensign & Shawn Roy & Tom Brzustowski, 2021. "Decisions by Key Office Building Stakeholders to Build or Retrofit Green in Toronto’s Urban Core," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-31, June.
    11. Jingfeng Yuan & Wen Yi & Mengyi Miao & Lei Zhang, 2018. "Evaluating the Impacts of Health, Social Network and Capital on Craft Efficiency and Productivity: A Case Study of Construction Workers in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-25, February.
    12. Pleasa Serin Abraham & Haripriya Gundimeda, 2020. "Greening offices: Willingness to pay for green-certified office spaces in Bengaluru, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 1839-1857, March.
    13. Mallory Elise Flowers & Daniel C. Matisoff & Douglas S. Noonan, 2020. "In the LEED: Racing to the Top in Environmental Self‐Regulation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2842-2856, September.
    14. Vithawat Surawattanasakul & Wachiranun Sirikul & Ratana Sapbamrer & Kampanat Wangsan & Jinjuta Panumasvivat & Pheerasak Assavanopakun & Supang Muangkaew, 2022. "Respiratory Symptoms and Skin Sick Building Syndrome among Office Workers at University Hospital, Chiang Mai, Thailand: Associations with Indoor Air Quality, AIRMED Project," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-14, August.
    15. Daniel C. Matisoff & Douglas S. Noonan & Mallory E. Flowers, 2016. "Policy Monitor—Green Buildings: Economics and Policies," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 10(2), pages 329-346.
    16. Amit Kant Kaushik & Mohammed Arif & Matt M. G. Syal & Muhammad Qasim Rana & Olugbenga Timo Oladinrin & Ahlam Ammar Sharif & Ala’a Saleh Alshdiefat, 2022. "Effect of Indoor Environment on Occupant Air Comfort and Productivity in Office Buildings: A Response Surface Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, November.
    17. Nadia Abdulghaffar, 2017. "Green Workplace Behaviour in Saudi Arabia: The Case of EnviroCo," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(1), pages 19-28, March.
    18. M. Esther García-Buades & José M. Peiró & María Isabel Montañez-Juan & Malgorzata W. Kozusznik & Silvia Ortiz-Bonnín, 2019. "Happy-Productive Teams and Work Units: A Systematic Review of the ‘Happy-Productive Worker Thesis’," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-39, December.
    19. Deepak Bangwal & Prakash Tiwari & Pankaj Chamola, 2017. "Workplace Design Features, Job Satisfaction, and Organization Commitment," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, July.
    20. Ioannis Vardopoulos & Ioannis Vannas & George Xydis & Constantinos Vassiliades, 2023. "Homeowners’ Perceptions of Renewable Energy and Market Value of Sustainable Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-18, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:19:p:8381-:d:1486450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.