IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i2p169-d88703.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industrial Symbiosis, Networking and Innovation: The Potential Role of Innovation Poles

Author

Listed:
  • Raffaella Taddeo

    (Department of Economic Studies, University G. d’Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, 65127 Pescara, Italy)

  • Alberto Simboli

    (Department of Economic Studies, University G. d’Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, 65127 Pescara, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Ioppolo

    (Department of Economics, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy)

  • Anna Morgante

    (Department of Economic Studies, University G. d’Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, 65127 Pescara, Italy)

Abstract

In the literature, there is much debate on how to make Industrial Symbiosis (IS) successful and on the factors that may potentially affect its implementation, including networking and innovation. They have so far found limited space for investigation in favor of other technical and economic aspects, such as the nature of the processes involved, regulatory issues, economic feasibility, and stakeholders involvement. However, in some cases, they may become relevant, especially when considered together and in their synergistic interaction. An interesting context to be considered in this respect is that of the Innovation Poles (IPs), which are government-sponsored consortia, created within EU programs with the objective of stimulating innovation within network of organizations and that promote the competitiveness in specific industries or value-chains at a local or regional level. In the present article, we firstly discuss how these topics have been so far addressed in IS studies, and then we analyze the main features of the IP model with the aim to understand if, and through which mechanisms, it can contribute to the development and spread of IS. A literature overview through desktop analysis and direct research, which particularly focused on the Italian IPs, provided the knowledge basis of the study. The results highlight the positive role that the IP model could play, both for its institutional activity of production and dissemination of knowledge and innovation, and, mostly, if considered as an applicative context for IS.

Suggested Citation

  • Raffaella Taddeo & Alberto Simboli & Giuseppe Ioppolo & Anna Morgante, 2017. "Industrial Symbiosis, Networking and Innovation: The Potential Role of Innovation Poles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:169-:d:88703
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/169/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/169/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Teresa Doménech & Michael Davies, 2011. "The role of Embeddedness in Industrial Symbiosis Networks: Phases in the Evolution of Industrial Symbiosis Networks," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(5), pages 281-296, July.
    2. Alfred Posch & Abhishek Agarwal & Peter Strachan, 2011. "Editorial: Managing Industrial Symbiosis (IS) Networks," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(7), pages 421-427, November.
    3. John Cantwell & Simona Iammarino, 1998. "MNCs, Technological Innovation and Regional Systems in the EU: Some Evidence in the Italian Case," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 383-408.
    4. Carlsson, Bo & Jacobsson, Staffan & Holmen, Magnus & Rickne, Annika, 2002. "Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 233-245, February.
    5. Pauline Deutz & David Gibbs, 2008. "Industrial Ecology and Regional Development: Eco-Industrial Development as Cluster Policy," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(10), pages 1313-1328.
    6. Olivier Crevoisier & Hugues Jeannerat, 2009. "Territorial Knowledge Dynamics: From the Proximity Paradigm to Multi-location Milieus," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(8), pages 1223-1241, August.
    7. John Ehrenfeld & Nicholas Gertler, 1997. "Industrial Ecology in Practice: The Evolution of Interdependence at Kalundborg," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 1(1), pages 67-79, January.
    8. David Keeble & Frank Wilkinson, 1999. "Collective Learning and Knowledge Development in the Evolution of Regional Clusters of High Technology SMEs in Europe," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 295-303.
    9. Anne P.M. Velenturf & Paul D. Jensen, 2016. "Promoting Industrial Symbiosis: Using the Concept of Proximity to Explore Social Network Development," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 20(4), pages 700-709, August.
    10. Simboli, Alberto & Taddeo, Raffaella & Morgante, Anna, 2015. "The potential of Industrial Ecology in agri-food clusters (AFCs): A case study based on valorisation of auxiliary materials," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 65-75.
    11. Frank Moulaert & Farid Sekia, 2003. "Territorial Innovation Models: A Critical Survey," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 289-302.
    12. repec:nct:journl:v:17:y:2009:i:8:p:1223-1241 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Olivier Crevoisier & Hugues Jeannerat, "undated". "Territorial Knowledge Dynamics: From the Proximity Paradigm to Multi-location Milieus," GRET Journal Papers 08-09, GRET Group of Research in Territorial Economy, University of Neuchâtel.
    14. Gabriel B. Grant & Thomas P. Seager & Guillaume Massard & Loring Nies, 2010. "Information and Communication Technology for Industrial Symbiosis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 14(5), pages 740-753, October.
    15. Baptista, Rui, 2000. "Do innovations diffuse faster within geographical clusters?," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 515-535, April.
    16. Ron Boschma, 2005. "Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 61-74.
    17. Frank W. Geels, 2005. "Technological Transitions and System Innovations," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3576.
    18. Baptista, Rui & Swann, Peter, 1998. "Do firms in clusters innovate more?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 525-540, September.
    19. Anne Hewes & Donald Lyons, 2008. "The Humanistic Side of Eco-Industrial Parks: Champions and the Role of Trust," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(10), pages 1329-1342.
    20. Donald I. Lyons, 2007. "A Spatial Analysis of Loop Closing Among Recycling, Remanufacturing, and Waste Treatment Firms in Texas," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 11(1), pages 43-54, January.
    21. David Gibbs, 2003. "Trust and Networking in Inter-firm Relations: the Case of Eco-industrial Development," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 18(3), pages 222-236, August.
    22. Marian Chertow & Weslynne Ashton & Juan Espinosa, 2008. "Industrial Symbiosis in Puerto Rico: Environmentally Related Agglomeration Economies," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(10), pages 1299-1312.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Taddeo, Raffaella & Simboli, Alberto & Morgante, Anna & Erkman, Suren, 2017. "The Development of Industrial Symbiosis in Existing Contexts. Experiences From Three Italian Clusters," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 55-67.
    2. Jooyoung Park & Juanita Duque-Hernández & Nohora Díaz-Posada, 2018. "Facilitating Business Collaborations for Industrial Symbiosis: The Pilot Experience of the Sustainable Industrial Network Program in Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Jonas Heiberg & Bernhard Truffer, 2021. "The emergence of a global innovation system – a case study from the water sector," GEIST - Geography of Innovation and Sustainability Transitions 2021(09), GEIST Working Paper Series.
    4. Mael Jambou & Andre Torre & Sabrina Dermine-Brullot & Sébastien Bourdin, 2022. "Inter-firm cooperation and local industrial ecology processes: evidence from three French case studies," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 68(2), pages 331-358, April.
    5. Ceci, Federica & Iubatti, Daniela, 2012. "Personal relationships and innovation diffusion in SME networks: A content analysis approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 565-579.
    6. Simona Iammarino & Philip McCann, 2010. "The Relationship between Multinational Firms and Innovative Clusters," Chapters, in: Ron Boschma & Ron Martin (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Geert Vissers & Ben Dankbaar, 2016. "Spatial Aspects of Interfirm Collaboration: An Exploration of Firm-Level Knowledge Dynamics," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(2), pages 260-273, February.
    8. Marilena Labianca, 2023. "Proposal of a Method for Identifying Socio-Economic Spatial Concentrations for the Development of Rural Areas: An Application to the Apulia Region (Southern Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    9. Hugo Pinto & Jorge André Guerreiro & Manuel Fernández-Esquinas, 2023. "Sources of knowledge in the firm: a review on influential, internal and contextual factors in innovation dynamics," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 1-32, February.
    10. Emilia Faria & Armando Caldeira-Pires & Cristiane Barreto, 2021. "Social, Economic, and Institutional Configurations of the Industrial Symbiosis Process: A Comparative Analysis of the Literature and a Proposed Theoretical and Analytical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-25, June.
    11. Binz, Christian & Truffer, Bernhard, 2017. "Global Innovation Systems—A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(7), pages 1284-1298.
    12. Marian R. Chertow & Koichi S. Kanaoka & Jooyoung Park, 2021. "Tracking the diffusion of industrial symbiosis scholarship using bibliometrics: Comparing across Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(4), pages 913-931, August.
    13. Sergio Barile & Clara Bassano & Raffaele D’Amore & Paolo Piciocchi & Marialuisa Saviano & Pietro Vito, 2021. "Insights of Digital Transformation Processes in Industrial Symbiosis from the Viable Systems Approach ( vSa )," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-14, August.
    14. Karlsson, Charlie & Johansson, Börje & Kobayashi, Kiyoshi & Stough, Roger R., 2014. "Knowledge, innovation and space," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 367, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    15. Elvira Uyarra & Kieron Flanagan & Edurne Magro & Jon Mikel Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, 2017. "Anchoring the innovation impacts of public procurement to place: The role of conversations," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(5), pages 828-848, August.
    16. Pierre Desrochers & Samuli Leppälä, 2010. "Industrial Symbiosis: Old Wine in Recycled Bottles? Some Perspective from the History of Economic and Geographical Thought," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 33(3), pages 338-361, July.
    17. Binz, Christian & Tang, Tian & Huenteler, Joern, 2017. "Spatial lifecycles of cleantech industries – The global development history of solar photovoltaics," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 386-402.
    18. Beckamp, Marius, 2021. "Industriesymbiosen als Ansatz regionaler Kreislaufwirtschaft: Begriffsklärung & strukturpolitische Potentiale," Forschung Aktuell 08/2021, Institut Arbeit und Technik (IAT), Westfälische Hochschule, University of Applied Sciences.
    19. Fraccascia, Luca & Yazan, Devrim Murat & Albino, Vito & Zijm, Henk, 2020. "The role of redundancy in industrial symbiotic business development: A theoretical framework explored by agent-based simulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    20. Anna Lütje & Volker Wohlgemuth, 2020. "Requirements Engineering for an Industrial Symbiosis Tool for Industrial Parks Covering System Analysis, Transformation Simulation and Goal Setting," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:169-:d:88703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.