IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v6y2014i4p2013-2030d34923.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability as a Priority at Major U.S. Department of Energy’s Defense Sites: Surrounding Population Views

Author

Listed:
  • Michael R. Greenberg

    (Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, 33 Livingston Avenue, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
    Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation, School of Engineering, Vanderbilt University, 299 Jacobs Hall, Nashville, TN 37235, USA)

  • Marc D. Weiner

    (Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, 33 Livingston Avenue, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
    Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation, School of Engineering, Vanderbilt University, 299 Jacobs Hall, Nashville, TN 37235, USA)

  • Henry Mayer

    (Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, 33 Livingston Avenue, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
    Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation, School of Engineering, Vanderbilt University, 299 Jacobs Hall, Nashville, TN 37235, USA)

  • David Kosson

    (Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation, School of Engineering, Vanderbilt University, 299 Jacobs Hall, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
    School of Engineering, Vanderbilt University, 299 Jacobs Hall, Nashville, TN 37235, USA)

  • Charles W. Powers

    (Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation, School of Engineering, Vanderbilt University, 299 Jacobs Hall, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
    School of Engineering, Vanderbilt University, 299 Jacobs Hall, Nashville, TN 37235, USA)

Abstract

Sustainability is rapidly becoming a widely accepted and desired attitude, as well as a stimulus for both environmentally-conscious individuals and firm behavior. However, does the public interest in sustainability also extend to large U.S. federal agencies? Does the public care about on-site sustainability programs? To answer this question, we surveyed 922 people who live within 50 miles of one of four U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) major facilities: Hanford, Idaho National Laboratory, Savannah River and the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Only 14% expressed no interest in DOE’s on-site sustainability efforts. Five percent said that they were interested enough to join a local community group to provide feedback to the DOE; 49% were interested and wanted more information, as well as interaction with the DOE’s site-specific advisory boards or local elected officials. Compared to other DOE on-site activities, respondents rated sustainability as “somewhat important”. Native Americans who live near a site, are familiar with it and self-identify as interested in environmental protection disproportionately belong to the “most interested” category. We conclude that public interest is sufficient to merit outreach by DOE to involve interested and knowledgeable local residents in on-site sustainability plans.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael R. Greenberg & Marc D. Weiner & Henry Mayer & David Kosson & Charles W. Powers, 2014. "Sustainability as a Priority at Major U.S. Department of Energy’s Defense Sites: Surrounding Population Views," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:4:p:2013-2030:d:34923
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/4/2013/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/4/2013/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Page, Benjamin I. & Shapiro, Robert Y. & Dempsey, Glenn R., 1987. "What Moves Public Opinion?," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 81(1), pages 23-43, March.
    2. Greenberg, Michael & Isserman, Andrew & Frisch, Michael & Krueckeberg, Donald & Lowrie, Karen & Mayer, Henry & Simon, Darien & Sorenson, David, 1999. "Questioning conventional wisdom: the regional economic impacts of Major US nuclear weapons sites, 1970-1994," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 183-204, September.
    3. Michael Greenberg & Karen Lowrie & Donald Krueckeberg & Henry Mayer & Darien Simon, 1997. "Bombs and Butterflies: A Case Study of the Challenges of Post Cold War Environmental Planning and Management for the US Nuclear Weapons Sites," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(6), pages 739-750.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bernhardt, Lea & Dewenter, Ralf & Thomas, Tobias, 2023. "Measuring partisan media bias in US newscasts from 2001 to 2012," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Hayo, Bernd & Neumeier, Florian, 2017. "The (In)validity of the Ricardian equivalence theorem–findings from a representative German population survey," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 162-174.
    3. Antoine Loeper & Jakub Steiner & Colin Stewart, 2014. "Influential Opinion Leaders," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 124(581), pages 1147-1167, December.
    4. Donald L. Jordan & Benjamin I. Page, 1992. "Shaping Foreign Policy Opinions," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(2), pages 227-241, June.
    5. Latré, Edwin & Perko, Tanja & Thijssen, Peter, 2017. "Public opinion change after the Fukushima nuclear accident: The role of national context revisited," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 124-133.
    6. Aimee Guglielmo Kinney & Thomas M. Leschine, 2002. "A Procedural Evaluation of an Analytic‐Deliberative Process: The Columbia River Comprehensive Impact Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1), pages 83-100, February.
    7. Henry J. Mayer & Michael R. Greenberg, 2001. "Coming Back from Economic Despair: Case Studies of Small- and Medium-Size American Cities," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 15(3), pages 203-216, August.
    8. Pfetsch, Barbara & Eilders, Christiane & Neidhardt, Friedhelm, 2004. "Das Kommentariat: Rolle und Status einer Öffentlichkeitselite," Discussion Papers, Working Group Political Communication and Mobilization SP IV 2004-402, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    9. Hill, Joshua & Oliver, Willard M. & Marion, Nancy E., 2010. ""Shaping history" or "Riding the wave"?: President Bush's influence on the public opinion of terrorism, homeland security, & crime," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 896-902, September.
    10. Kriesi, Hanspeter, 2001. "Die Rolle der Öffentlichkeit im politischen Entscheidungsprozess: Ein konzeptueller Rahmen für ein international vergleichendes Forschungsprojekt," Discussion Papers, Working Group Political Communication and Mobilization P 01-701, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    11. Katerina Linos & Kimberly Twist, 2016. "The Supreme Court, the Media, and Public Opinion: Comparing Experimental and Observational Methods," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 45(2), pages 223-254.
    12. Carisa Bergner & Bruce A. Desmarais & John Hird, 2019. "Speaking truth in power: Scientific evidence as motivation for policy activism," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 2(1).
    13. Benjamin I. Page, "undated". "Is Social Security Reform Ready for the American Public?," IPR working papers 99-6, Institute for Policy Resarch at Northwestern University.
    14. Taylor-Clark, Kalahn Alexandra & Mebane, Felicia E. & SteelFisher, Gillian K. & Blendon, Robert J., 2007. "News of disparity: Content analysis of news coverage of African American healthcare inequalities in the USA, 1994-2004," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 405-417, August.
    15. Gallo-Rivera, María Teresa & Mancha-Navarro, Tomás & Garrido-Yserte, Rubén, 2013. "Application of the counterfactual method to assess of the local economic impact of a nuclear power station," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1481-1492.
    16. Herman Bakvis & Jennifer Smith, 1997. "Third-Party Advertising and Electoral Democracy: The Political Theory of the Alberta Court of Appeal in Somerville v. Canada (Attorney General) [1996]," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 23(2), pages 164-178, June.
    17. Asher Arian & Sigalit Olzaeker, 1999. "Political and Economic Interactions with National Security Opinion," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 43(1), pages 58-77, February.
    18. Greenberg, Michael R. & Lewis, David A. & Frisch, Michael & Lowrie, Karen W. & Mayer, Henry J., 2002. "The US Department of Energy's regional economic legacy: spatial dimensions of a half century of dependency," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 109-125, June.
    19. Fannin, J. Matthew & Hughes, David W. & Keithly, Walter R. & Olatubi, Williams O. & Guo, Jiemin, 2008. "Deepwater energy industry impacts on economic growth and public service provision in Lafourche Parish, Louisiana," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 190-205, September.
    20. Michael R. Greenberg, 2009. "NIMBY, CLAMP, and the Location of New Nuclear‐Related Facilities: U.S. National and 11 Site‐Specific Surveys," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(9), pages 1242-1254, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:4:p:2013-2030:d:34923. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.