IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p3015-d1622790.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial Intelligence Applications in Primary Education: A Quantitatively Complemented Mixed-Meta-Method Study

Author

Listed:
  • Yavuz Topkaya

    (Education Faculty, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay 31060, Turkey)

  • Yunus Doğan

    (School of Foreign Languages, Fırat University, Elazığ 23119, Turkey)

  • Veli Batdı

    (Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep 27310, Turkey)

  • Sami Aydın

    (Gaziantep Education Faculty, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep 27310, Turkey)

Abstract

In recent years, rapidly advancing technology has reshaped our world, holding the potential to transform social and economic structures. The United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) provide a comprehensive roadmap that promotes not only economic growth but also social, environmental, and global sustainability. Meanwhile, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a critical technology contributing to sustainable development by offering solutions to both social and economic challenges. One of the fundamental ideas is that education should always maintain a dynamic structure that supports sustainable development and fosters individuals equipped with sustainability skills. In this study, the impact of various variables related to AI applications in primary education at the elementary school level, in line with sustainable development goals, was evaluated using a mixed meta-method complemented with quantitative analyses. Within the framework of the mixed meta-method, a meta-analysis of data obtained from studies conducted between 2005 and 2025 was performed using the CMA program. The analysis determined a medium effect size of g = 0.51. To validate the meta-analysis results and enhance their content validity, a meta-thematic analysis was conducted, applying content analysis to identify themes and codes. In the final stage of this research, to further support the data obtained through the mixed meta-method, a set of evaluation form questions prepared within the Rasch measurement model framework was administered to primary school teachers. The collected data were analyzed using the FACETS program. The findings from the meta-analysis document review indicated that AI studies in primary education were most commonly applied in mathematics courses. During the meta-thematic analysis process, themes related to the impact of AI applications on learning environments, challenges encountered during implementation, and proposed solutions were identified. The Rasch measurement model process revealed that AI applications were widely used in science and mathematics curricula (FBP-4 and MP-2). Among the evaluators (raters), J2 was identified as the most lenient rater, while J11 was the strictest. When analyzing the AI-related items, the statement “I can help students prepare a presentation describing their surroundings using AI tools” (I17) was identified as the most challenging item, whereas “I understand how to effectively use AI applications in classroom activities” (I14) was found to be the easiest. The results of the analyses indicate that the obtained data are complementary and mutually supportive. The findings of this research are expected to serve as a guide for future studies and applications related to the topic, making significant contributions to the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Yavuz Topkaya & Yunus Doğan & Veli Batdı & Sami Aydın, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence Applications in Primary Education: A Quantitatively Complemented Mixed-Meta-Method Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-29, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3015-:d:1622790
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3015/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3015/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan A.C. Sterne & Roger M. Harbord, 2004. "Funnel plots in meta-analysis," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 4(2), pages 127-141, June.
    2. Keeheon Lee, 2021. "A Systematic Review on Social Sustainability of Artificial Intelligence in Product Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-29, March.
    3. Miriam Du-Phuong Ta & Stefan Wendt & Throstur Olaf Sigurjonsson, 2024. "Applying Artificial Intelligence to Promote Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-17, June.
    4. repec:taf:entreg:v:24:y:2012:i:5-6:p:425-456 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Xian Jing & Rongxin Zhu & Jieqiong Lin & Baojun Yu & Mingming Lu, 2022. "Education Sustainability for Intelligent Manufacturing in the Context of the New Generation of Artificial Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael J. Crowther & Dean Langan & Alex J. Sutton, 2012. "Graphical augmentations to the funnel plot to assess the impact of a new study on an existing meta-analysis," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 12(4), pages 605-622, December.
    2. Solomiia Brychka & Denys Klynovskyi & Dmytro Krukovets & Artem Oharkov, 2019. "Meta-Analysis: Meta-Analysis: Effect of FX interventions on the exchange rate," Modern Economic Studies, Kyiv School of Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 24-44.
    3. Amal F. Alshammary & Khalid Khalaf Alharbi & Naif Jameel Alshehri & Vishal Vennu & Imran Ali Khan, 2021. "Metabolic Syndrome and Coronary Artery Disease Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Ugur, Mehmet & Awaworyi, Sefa & Solomon, Edna, 2016. "Technological innovation and employment in derived labour demand models: A hierarchical meta-regression analysis," MPRA Paper 73557, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Ugur, Mehmet & Trushin, Eshref & Solomon, Edna & Guidi, Francesco, 2016. "R&D and productivity in OECD firms and industries: A hierarchical meta-regression analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 2069-2086.
    6. Da-Jung Ha & Jung-Hyun Park & Su-Eun Jung & Boram Lee & Myo-Sung Kim & Kyo-Lin Sim & Yung-Hyun Choi & Chan-Young Kwon, 2021. "The Experience of Emotional Labor and Its Related Factors among Nurses in General Hospital Settings in Republic of Korea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Christin Höge-Junge & Stefan Eckert, 2024. "Multinationality and systematic risk: a literature review and meta-analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 377-414, February.
    8. Nino Fonseca & Marcelino Sánchez-Rivero, 2020. "Significance bias in the tourism-led growth literature," Tourism Economics, , vol. 26(1), pages 137-154, February.
    9. Ugur, Mehmet & Mitra, Arup, 2017. "Technology Adoption and Employment in Less Developed Countries: A Mixed-Method Systematic Review," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 1-18.
    10. Carina Neisser, 2021. "The Elasticity of Taxable Income: A Meta-Regression Analysis [The top 1% in international and historical perspective]," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 131(640), pages 3365-3391.
    11. Soon, Jan-Jan & Ahmad, Siti-Aznor, 2015. "Willingly or grudgingly? A meta-analysis on the willingness-to-pay for renewable energy use," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 877-887.
    12. Juan Luis Gómez-Reino & Santiago Lago-Peñas & Jorge Martinez-Vazquez, 2021. "Evidence on economies of scale in local public service provision: a meta-analysis," Working Papers. Collection A: Public economics, governance and decentralization 2103, Universidade de Vigo, GEN - Governance and Economics research Network.
    13. Dumont, Michel, 2022. "Public support to business research and development in Belgium: fourth evaluation," MPRA Paper 115418, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Chau Thi Diem Le & Miklós Pakurár & István András Kun & Judit Oláh, 2021. "The impact of factors on information sharing: An application of meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, December.
    15. Alex R. Piquero & David P. Farrington & Brandon C. Welsh & Richard Tremblay & Wesley G. Jennings, 2008. "Effects of Early Family/Parent Training Programs on Antisocial Behavior & Delinquency," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(1), pages 1-122.
    16. Asim,Salman & Chase,Robert S. & Dar,Amit & Schmillen,Achim Daniel, 2015. "Improving education outcomes in South Asia : findings from a decade of impact evaluations," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7362, The World Bank.
    17. Jonathan Stokes & Maria Panagioti & Rahul Alam & Kath Checkland & Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi & Peter Bower, 2015. "Effectiveness of Case Management for 'At Risk' Patients in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-42, July.
    18. Roger M. Harbord & Ross J. Harris & Jonathan A. C. Sterne, 2009. "Updated tests for small-study effects in meta-analyses," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 9(2), pages 197-210, June.
    19. David B. Yaden & Cassondra L. Batz-Barbarich & Vincent Ng & Hoda Vaziri & Jessica N. Gladstone & James O. Pawelski & Louis Tay, 2022. "A Meta-Analysis of Religion/Spirituality and Life Satisfaction," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 4147-4163, December.
    20. Jamal Hallajzadeh & Saeid Safiri & Mohammad Ali Mansournia & Maliheh Khoramdad & Neda Izadi & Amir Almasi-Hashiani & Reza Pakzad & Erfan Ayubi & Mark J M Sullman & Nahid Karamzad, 2017. "Metabolic syndrome and its components among rheumatoid arthritis patients: A comprehensive updated systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3015-:d:1622790. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.