IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p2864-d1619087.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Resistance to Acceptance: The Role of NIMBY Phenomena in Sustainable Urban Development and Tourism

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Dvornik Perhavec

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering and Architecture, University of Maribor, Smetanova 17, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia)

  • Rok Kamnik

    (Department of Operational Construction, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering and Architecture, University of Maribor, Smetanova 17, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia)

Abstract

The role of NIMBY (“Not in My Backyard”) phenomena in sustainable urban development and tourism was analyzed, with a focus on stakeholder dynamics and implications for spatial planning. Based on an analysis of worldwide case studies, the main barriers and opportunities presented by these phenomena were identified, including the impact of project preparation time ( t p ) and benefit realization time ( t b ). A mixed methods approach was used, combining qualitative analysis of case studies with quantitative evaluation of project timelines. The results show that effective stakeholder engagement significantly reduces t p , while maximizing t b increases long-term benefits for communities and the environment. This research emphasizes the systemic interdependence of urban planning, environmental sustainability, tourism, and cultural heritage preservation, offering actionable insights for policymakers and developers. The conclusions emphasize the importance of participatory approaches to ensure equitable and sustainable urban transformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Dvornik Perhavec & Rok Kamnik, 2025. "From Resistance to Acceptance: The Role of NIMBY Phenomena in Sustainable Urban Development and Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-29, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:2864-:d:1619087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/2864/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/2864/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Horton & David Rand & Richard Zeckhauser, 2011. "The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor market," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 14(3), pages 399-425, September.
    2. Sudhir, V. & Muraleedharan, V. R. & Srinivasan, G., 1996. "Integrated solid waste management in Urban India: A critical operational research framework," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 163-181, September.
    3. Jing Bai & Jiansheng Qu & Tek Narayan Maraseni & Jinjia Wu & Li Xu & Yujie Fan, 2019. "Spatial and Temporal Variations of Embodied Carbon Emissions in China’s Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Dijana Vuletić & Silvija Krajter Ostoić & Klára Báliková & Mersudin Avdibegović & Kristina Potočki & Špela Pezdevšek Malovrh & Stjepan Posavec & Srđan Stojnić & Alessandro Paletto, 2021. "Stakeholders’ Opinions towards Water-Related Forests Ecosystem Services in Selected Southeast European Countries (Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Slovenia and Serbia)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Annesi, Nora & Battaglia, Massimo & Frey, Marco, 2021. "Stakeholder engagement by an Italian water utility company: Insight from participant observation of dialogism," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    6. Waqas Ahmed & Suhail Ahmed & Jehangir F. Punthakey & Ghulam Hussain Dars & Muhammad Shafqat Ejaz & Abdul Latif Qureshi & Michael Mitchell, 2024. "Statistical Analysis of Climate Trends and Impacts on Groundwater Sustainability in the Lower Indus Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, January.
    7. David G. Rand & Joshua D. Greene & Martin A. Nowak, 2012. "Spontaneous giving and calculated greed," Nature, Nature, vol. 489(7416), pages 427-430, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jérôme Hergueux & Nicolas Jacquemet, 2015. "Social preferences in the online laboratory: a randomized experiment," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 18(2), pages 251-283, June.
    2. Gandullia, Luca & Lezzi, Emanuela & Parciasepe, Paolo, 2020. "Replication with MTurk of the experimental design by Gangadharan, Grossman, Jones & Leister (2018): Charitable giving across donor types," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    3. repec:cup:judgdm:v:13:y:2018:i:3:p:260-267 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Gabriella D’Amore & Maria Testa & Luigi Lepore, 2023. "How Is the Utilities Sector Contributing to Building a Sustainable Future? A Systematic Literature Review of Sustainability Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Engel, Christoph & Rand, David G., 2014. "What does “clean” really mean? The implicit framing of decontextualized experiments," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 386-389.
    6. Capraro, Valerio, 2017. "Does the truth come naturally? Time pressure increases honesty in one-shot deception games," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 54-57.
    7. Exley, Christine L. & Petrie, Ragan, 2018. "The impact of a surprise donation ask," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 152-167.
    8. David G Rand & Gordon Kraft-Todd & June Gruber, 2015. "The Collective Benefits of Feeling Good and Letting Go: Positive Emotion and (dis)Inhibition Interact to Predict Cooperative Behavior," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, January.
    9. Guo, Yiting & Shachat, Jason & Walker, Matthew J. & Wei, Lijia, 2023. "On the generalizability of using mobile devices to conduct economic experiments," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    10. Alexander Peysakhovich & David G. Rand, 2016. "Habits of Virtue: Creating Norms of Cooperation and Defection in the Laboratory," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(3), pages 631-647, March.
    11. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:6:p:926-938 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Elias Bouacida & Renaud Foucart, 2020. "The acceptability of lotteries in allocation problems," Working Papers 301646245, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    13. Victor H. Aguiar & Maria Jose Boccardi & Nail Kashaev & Jeongbin Kim, 2023. "Random utility and limited consideration," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 14(1), pages 71-116, January.
    14. Capraro, Valerio & Schulz, Jonathan & Rand, David G., 2019. "Time pressure and honesty in a deception game," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 93-99.
    15. Jillian J Jordan & David G Rand & Samuel Arbesman & James H Fowler & Nicholas A Christakis, 2013. "Contagion of Cooperation in Static and Fluid Social Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-10, June.
    16. Rand, David G. & Fudenberg, Drew & Dreber, Anna, 2015. "It's the thought that counts: The role of intentions in noisy repeated games," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 481-499.
    17. Manapat, Michael L. & Nowak, Martin A. & Rand, David G., 2013. "Information, irrationality, and the evolution of trust," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 90(S), pages 57-75.
    18. Michael N. Stagnaro & Gordon Pennycook & David G. Rand, 2018. "Performance on the Cognitive Reflection Test is stable across time," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 13(3), pages 260-267, May.
    19. Capraro, Valerio & Kuilder, Jotte, 2016. "To know or not to know? Looking at payoffs signals selfish behavior, but it does not actually mean so," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 79-84.
    20. Jeremy Cone & David G Rand, 2014. "Time Pressure Increases Cooperation in Competitively Framed Social Dilemmas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, December.
    21. Jillian Jordan & Katherine McAuliffe & David Rand, 2016. "The effects of endowment size and strategy method on third party punishment," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 19(4), pages 741-763, December.
    22. Valerio Capraro, 2013. "A Model of Human Cooperation in Social Dilemmas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-6, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:2864-:d:1619087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.