IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i6p2727-d1615755.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Living Lab Concept: Where, How and for What Is Being Used in Europe to Support Energy, Social and Environmental Transition

Author

Listed:
  • Alba Arias

    (Competence Center for Digital Energy and Electric Power, Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Technikumstrasse 21, 6048 Horw, Switzerland
    CAVIAR Research Group, Department of Architecture, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Plaza Oñati 2, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain)

  • Claudia Pennese

    (CAVIAR Research Group, Department of Architecture, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Plaza Oñati 2, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain)

  • Olatz Grijalba

    (CAVIAR Research Group, Department of Architecture, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Plaza Oñati 2, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain)

  • Yousra Sidqi

    (Competence Center for Digital Energy and Electric Power, Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Technikumstrasse 21, 6048 Horw, Switzerland)

Abstract

Due to the current climate situation, it is necessary to apply new methods that support environmental, social, and energy challenges to respond to global emergencies. In this regard, Living Labs have increased their popularity as a strategic tool to promote innovation from the local level and proximity. This study aims to detect the patterns, trends, and coherence of the so-called Living Labs. For this purpose, a characterisation of Living Labs has been undertaken that focuses on energy, environmental, and social issues in Europe to support urban transition. It concludes that Living Labs do not have a single solution. They are highly influenced by the current European trends and promoted topics. They can be multi-dimensional (digital and physical), multi-scale (from small, such as the product, to large, such as the territory) and multi-purpose. It is determined that there is an absence of working in real-life environments and some of the Living Lab’s principles. Among the topics, the most common ones are social inclusion, environment, energy, health, and IoT. The implemented scale in a building and the product on the application scale are the most frequent ones. Urban Living Labs are identified as a niche opportunity because of their low current development.

Suggested Citation

  • Alba Arias & Claudia Pennese & Olatz Grijalba & Yousra Sidqi, 2025. "Application of Living Lab Concept: Where, How and for What Is Being Used in Europe to Support Energy, Social and Environmental Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-26, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2727-:d:1615755
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2727/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2727/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sara Amoroso & Alex Coad & Nicola Grassano, 2018. "European R&D networks: a snapshot from the 7th EU Framework Programme," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5-6), pages 404-419, August.
    2. Sphokazi Phelokazi Mbatha & Josephine Kaviti Musango, 2022. "A Systematic Review on the Application of the Living Lab Concept and Role of Stakeholders in the Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Nikša Alfirević & Lena Malešević Perović & Maja Mihaljević Kosor, 2023. "Productivity and Impact of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)-Related Academic Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Libera Amenta & Anna Attademo & Hilde Remøy & Gilda Berruti & Maria Cerreta & Enrico Formato & Maria Federica Palestino & Michelangelo Russo, 2019. "Managing the Transition towards Circular Metabolism: Living Labs as a Co-Creation Approach," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 5-18.
    5. Federico Caprotti & Robert Cowley & Ayona Datta & Vanesa Castán Broto & Eleanor Gao & Lucien Georgeson & Clare Herrick & Nancy Odendaal & Simon Joss, 2017. "The New Urban Agenda: key opportunities and challenges for policy and practice," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 367-378, July.
    6. Syed Sundus Raza & Eoin Reeves, 2024. "Starting from Scratch: The Articulated Development of a Smart City in Limerick, Ireland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Libera Amenta & Anna Attademo & Hilde Remøy & Gilda Berruti & Maria Cerreta & Enrico Formato & Maria Federica Palestino & Michelangelo Russo, 2019. "Managing the Transition towards Circular Metabolism: Living Labs as a Co-Creation Approach," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 5-18.
    8. Eleanor Eaton & Alistair Hunt & Anastasia Di Leo & Daniel Black & Gwen Frost & Sarah Hargreaves, 2022. "What Are the Environmental Benefits and Costs of Reducing Food Waste? Bristol as a Case Study in the WASTE FEW Urban Living Lab Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, May.
    9. Paskaleva, Krassimira & Cooper, Ian, 2021. "Are living labs effective? Exploring the evidence," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    10. Diego Hernando Florez Ayala & Anete Alberton & Aksel Ersoy, 2022. "Urban Living Labs: Pathways of Sustainability Transitions towards Innovative City Systems from a Circular Economy Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-29, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hilde Remøy & Alexander Wandl & Denis Ceric & Arjan van Timmeren, 2019. "Facilitating Circular Economy in Urban Planning," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 1-4.
    2. Anna Kovacs-Györi & Pablo Cabrera-Barona & Bernd Resch & Michael Mehaffy & Thomas Blaschke, 2019. "Assessing and Representing Livability through the Analysis of Residential Preference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Shuangqing Sheng & Wei Song & Hua Lian & Lei Ning, 2022. "Review of Urban Land Management Based on Bibliometrics," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.
    4. Marco Cavallaro & Benedetto Lepori, 2021. "Institutional barriers to participation in EU framework programs: contrasting the Swiss and UK cases," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1311-1328, February.
    5. Jonathon Taylor & Andy Haines & James Milner & Mike Davies & Paul Wilkinson, 2018. "A Comparative Analysis of Global Datasets and Initiatives for Urban Health and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    6. Ludmila Soares Carneiro & Michael Henry, 2024. "Integrating the Sustainable Development Goals into Corporate Governance: A Cross-Sectoral Analysis of Japanese Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-25, August.
    7. Molinari, Marco & Anund Vogel, Jonas & Rolando, Davide & Lundqvist, Per, 2023. "Using living labs to tackle innovation bottlenecks: the KTH Live-In Lab case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    8. Daniel Black & Taoyuan Wei & Eleanor Eaton & Alistair Hunt & Joy Carey & Ulrich Schmutz & Bingzi He & Ian Roderick, 2023. "Testing Food Waste Reduction Targets: Integrating Transition Scenarios with Macro-Valuation in an Urban Living Lab," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Roberta Sonnino & Helen Coulson, 2021. "Unpacking the new urban food agenda: The changing dynamics of global governance in the urban age," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(5), pages 1032-1049, April.
    10. Daniel Black & Susanne Charlesworth & Maria Ester Dal Poz & Erika Cristina Francisco & Adina Paytan & Ian Roderick & Timo von Wirth & Kevin Winter, 2023. "Comparing Societal Impact Planning and Evaluation Approaches across Four Urban Living Labs (in Food-Energy-Water Systems)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Biancamaria Torquati & Giulia Giacchè & Tiziano Tempesta, 2020. "Landscapes and Services in Peri-Urban Areas and Choice of Housing Location: An Application of Discrete Choice Experiments," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-21, October.
    12. Khan, Muhammad Salar & Jamil, Kamil & Malik, Ammar A., 2022. "Delivering Urban Mass Transit—The Case of Lahore, Pakistan," SocArXiv 2zj8m, Center for Open Science.
    13. Daniele Archibugi & Rinaldo Evangelista & Antonio Vezzani, 2021. "Centripetal and centrifugal forces in technological activities: linking regional innovation performances to EU Science & Technology policies," Working Papers 47, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Jan 2021.
    14. Fedoua Kasmi & Ferney Osorio & Laurent Dupont & Brunelle Marche & Mauricio Camargo, 2022. "Innovation Spaces as Drivers of Eco-innovations Supporting the Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review," Post-Print hal-03590438, HAL.
    15. Kamila Borsekova & Samuel Koróny & Peter Nijkamp, 2022. "In Search of Concerted Strategies for Competitive and Resilient Regions," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 607-634, September.
    16. Michael Keith & Eugenie Birch & Nicolas J. A. Buchoud & Maruxa Cardama & William Cobbett & Michael Cohen & Thomas Elmqvist & Jessica Espey & Maarten Hajer & Gunnar Hartmann & Tadashi Matsumoto & Susan, 2023. "A new urban narrative for sustainable development," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(2), pages 115-117, February.
    17. Crecentia Pamidzai Gandidzanwa & Muchaiteyi Togo, 2022. "Adaptive Responses to Water, Energy, and Food Challenges and Implications on the Environment: An Exploratory Study of Harare," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    18. Khushboo Gupta & Wenwen Zhang & Ralph P Hall, 2021. "Risk priorities and their co-occurrences in smart city project implementation: Evidence from India’s Smart Cities Mission (SCM)," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(4), pages 880-894, May.
    19. Erick Elysio Reis Amorim & Monique Menezes & Karoline Vitória Gonçalves Fernandes, 2022. "Urban Living Labs and Critical Infrastructure Resilience: A Global Match?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    20. Ananya Tiwari & Luís Campos Rodrigues & Frances E. Lucy & Salem Gharbia, 2022. "Building Climate Resilience in Coastal City Living Labs Using Ecosystem-Based Adaptation: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-29, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2727-:d:1615755. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.