IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i6p2568-d1612560.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Activated Carbon Production from Sunflower Seeds via Chemical Activation

Author

Listed:
  • Selma Kuloglija

    (Institute of Chemical, Environmental & Bioscience Engineering E166, Technische Universität Wien, 1060 Vienna, Austria)

  • Amal El Gohary Ahmed

    (Institute of Chemical, Environmental & Bioscience Engineering E166, Technische Universität Wien, 1060 Vienna, Austria)

  • Christian Jordan

    (Institute of Chemical, Environmental & Bioscience Engineering E166, Technische Universität Wien, 1060 Vienna, Austria)

  • Matthias Golda

    (Institute of Chemical, Environmental & Bioscience Engineering E166, Technische Universität Wien, 1060 Vienna, Austria)

  • Wolfgang Ipsmiller

    (Institute of Chemical, Environmental & Bioscience Engineering E166, Technische Universität Wien, 1060 Vienna, Austria)

  • Noah Steinacher

    (Institute of Chemical, Environmental & Bioscience Engineering E166, Technische Universität Wien, 1060 Vienna, Austria)

  • Franz Winter

    (Institute of Chemical, Environmental & Bioscience Engineering E166, Technische Universität Wien, 1060 Vienna, Austria)

  • Daniela Meitner

    (Next Generation Elements GmbH, Gewerbstrasse 4, 4511 Allhaming, Austria)

  • Angelika Luckeneder

    (Next Generation Elements GmbH, Gewerbstrasse 4, 4511 Allhaming, Austria)

  • Michael Harasek

    (Institute of Chemical, Environmental & Bioscience Engineering E166, Technische Universität Wien, 1060 Vienna, Austria)

Abstract

The increasing demand for high-performance activated carbon necessitates applying sustainable and cost-effective production methods. This study explores the use of biochar derived from renewable biomass. The primary feedstock for biochar consisted of woody residues from composting, along with pre-dried sunflower seed shells that had a moisture content of around 10% as a precursor for the production of activated carbon. The process started with carbonization followed by potassium hydroxide (KOH) activation. Key parameters such as the impregnation ratio, temperature, and activation time were optimized to enhance the physicochemical properties of the activated carbon. Under optimized conditions, namely a KOH-to-biochar impregnation ratio of 3:1, an activation temperature of 800 °C, and an activation duration of 5 h, the yield of activated carbon was 58% and the specific surface area was 498 m 2 /g. A significant enhancement in surface area, with a maximum value of 709 m 2 /g, was achieved after increasing the time to 24 h of activation. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) analysis was applied to evaluate the CO 2 adsorption performance of both biochar and activated biochar at 30 °C, demonstrating a 30% improvement in adsorption efficiency following activation. This study underscores the potential of biochar as a renewable and sustainable precursor for the production of high-performance activated carbon. This study underscores the potential of biochar derived from agro residue as a source for the production of high-performance activated carbon. The findings contribute to the advancement of environmentally friendly production technologies and highlight the potential applicability of biochar-derived activated carbon in gas adsorption and environmental remediation.

Suggested Citation

  • Selma Kuloglija & Amal El Gohary Ahmed & Christian Jordan & Matthias Golda & Wolfgang Ipsmiller & Noah Steinacher & Franz Winter & Daniela Meitner & Angelika Luckeneder & Michael Harasek, 2025. "Sustainable Activated Carbon Production from Sunflower Seeds via Chemical Activation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2568-:d:1612560
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2568/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2568/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Galinato, Suzette P. & Yoder, Jonathan K. & Granatstein, David, 2011. "The economic value of biochar in crop production and carbon sequestration," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 6344-6350, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Zhikun & Zhu, Zongyuan & Shen, Boxiong & Liu, Lina, 2019. "Insights into biochar and hydrochar production and applications: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 581-598.
    2. Partnership for Market Readiness, 2021. "Beyond Mitigation," World Bank Publications - Reports 35624, The World Bank Group.
    3. Francisco Miguel González-Pernas & Cristina Grajera-Antolín & Olivia García-Cámara & María González-Lucas & María Teresa Martín & Sergio González-Egido & Juan Luis Aguirre, 2022. "Effects of Biochar on Biointensive Horticultural Crops and Its Economic Viability in the Mediterranean Climate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Ren, Xueyong & Shanb Ghazani, Mohammad & Zhu, Hui & Ao, Wenya & Zhang, Han & Moreside, Emma & Zhu, Jinjiao & Yang, Pu & Zhong, Na & Bi, Xiaotao, 2022. "Challenges and opportunities in microwave-assisted catalytic pyrolysis of biomass: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    5. Cesare Caputo & Ondřej Mašek, 2021. "SPEAR (Solar Pyrolysis Energy Access Reactor): Theoretical Design and Evaluation of a Small-Scale Low-Cost Pyrolysis Unit for Implementation in Rural Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-27, April.
    6. Taras Lychuk & Roberto Izaurralde & Robert Hill & William McGill & Jimmy Williams, 2015. "Biochar as a global change adaptation: predicting biochar impacts on crop productivity and soil quality for a tropical soil with the Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) model," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 20(8), pages 1437-1458, December.
    7. Mohammadi, Ali & Cowie, Annette L. & Cacho, Oscar & Kristiansen, Paul & Anh Mai, Thi Lan & Joseph, Stephen, 2017. "Biochar addition in rice farming systems: Economic and energy benefits," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 415-425.
    8. You, Siming & Tong, Huanhuan & Armin-Hoiland, Joel & Tong, Yen Wah & Wang, Chi-Hwa, 2017. "Techno-economic and greenhouse gas savings assessment of decentralized biomass gasification for electrifying the rural areas of Indonesia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 495-510.
    9. Anand, Abhijeet & Kumar, Vivek & Kaushal, Priyanka, 2022. "Biochar and its twin benefits: Crop residue management and climate change mitigation in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    10. Ng, Wei Cheng & You, Siming & Ling, Ran & Gin, Karina Yew-Hoong & Dai, Yanjun & Wang, Chi-Hwa, 2017. "Co-gasification of woody biomass and chicken manure: Syngas production, biochar reutilization, and cost-benefit analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 732-742.
    11. Berazneva, Julia & Woolf, Dominic & Lee, David R., 2021. "Local lignocellulosic biofuel and biochar co-production in Sub-Saharan Africa: The role of feedstock provision in economic viability," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    12. Lydia Fryda & Rianne Visser, 2015. "Biochar for Soil Improvement: Evaluation of Biochar from Gasification and Slow Pyrolysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-40, November.
    13. Maggen, Jens & Carleer, Robert & Yperman, Jan & De Vocht, Alain & Schreurs, Sonja & Reggers, Guy & Thijsen, Elsy, 2017. "Biochar Derived from the Dry, Solid Fraction of Pig Manure as Potential Fertilizer for Poor and Contaminated Soils," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(2), May.
    14. Badgujar, Kirtikumar C. & Wilson, Lee D. & Bhanage, Bhalchandra M., 2019. "Recent advances for sustainable production of levulinic acid in ionic liquids from biomass: Current scenario, opportunities and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 266-284.
    15. Nguyen, Thu Lan T. & Hermansen, John E. & Mogensen, Lisbeth, 2013. "Environmental performance of crop residues as an energy source for electricity production: The case of wheat straw in Denmark," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 633-641.
    16. Kang, Shimin & Fu, Jinxia & Zhang, Gang, 2018. "From lignocellulosic biomass to levulinic acid: A review on acid-catalyzed hydrolysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 340-362.
    17. Cruce, Jesse R. & Quinn, Jason C., 2019. "Economic viability of multiple algal biorefining pathways and the impact of public policies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 735-746.
    18. Song, Biao & Almatrafi, Eydhah & Tan, Xiaofei & Luo, Songhao & Xiong, Weiping & Zhou, Chengyun & Qin, Meng & Liu, Yang & Cheng, Min & Zeng, Guangming & Gong, Jilai, 2022. "Biochar-based agricultural soil management: An application-dependent strategy for contributing to carbon neutrality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    19. Wang, Wei-Cheng, 2016. "Techno-economic analysis of a bio-refinery process for producing Hydro-processed Renewable Jet fuel from Jatropha," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 63-73.
    20. Brown, Tristan R. & Thilakaratne, Rajeeva & Brown, Robert C. & Hu, Guiping, 2013. "Regional differences in the economic feasibility of advanced biorefineries: Fast pyrolysis and hydroprocessing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 234-243.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2568-:d:1612560. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.