IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i6p2557-d1612212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Dual-Channel Low-Carbon Supply Chain Network Equilibrium with Retailers’ Risk Aversion Under Carbon Trading

Author

Listed:
  • Hongchun Wang

    (School of Urban Economics and Management, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 102616, China)

  • Caifeng Lin

    (School of Urban Economics and Management, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 102616, China)

Abstract

Carbon emissions from human activities such as production and consumption have exacerbated climate deterioration. A common worldwide objective is to create a low-carbon economy by implementing carbon reduction measures in production, consumption, and other processes. To this end, this paper explores the production, price, carbon reduction rate, and profit or utility for a dual-channel low-carbon supply chain network (DLSCN) that includes numerous competing suppliers, manufacturers, risk-averse retailers, and demand markets under carbon trading. In order to create an equilibrium model for the DLSCN, risk-averse retailers are characterized using the mean-CVaR method, and each member’s optimal decision-making behavior is described using variational inequalities. A projection contraction algorithm is used to solve the model, and numerical analysis is presented to investigate how risk aversion, carbon abatement investment cost coefficients, and carbon trading prices affect network equilibrium. The results indicate that increasing retailers’ risk aversion can enhance supply chain members’ profits and carbon reduction rates. Retailers prioritize expected profits, while other members prefer them to focus more on CVaR profits. When retailers are more risk-averse and value CVaR, traditional retail channels become more popular. Increasing the carbon reduction investment cost coefficients for suppliers and manufacturers can boost their profits, and retailers also support this move to charge more for low-carbon products and enhance utility. When carbon trading prices rise, suppliers and manufacturers opt to increase carbon reduction rates to generate more profits from selling carbon allowances. This study provides decision-making references for achieving both economic and environmental benefits for members of DLSCN.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongchun Wang & Caifeng Lin, 2025. "The Dual-Channel Low-Carbon Supply Chain Network Equilibrium with Retailers’ Risk Aversion Under Carbon Trading," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-28, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2557-:d:1612212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2557/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2557/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jin Tao & Lusheng Shao & Zhimin Guan & William Ho & Srinivas Talluri, 2020. "Incorporating risk aversion and fairness considerations into procurement and distribution decisions in a supply chain," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(7), pages 1950-1967, April.
    2. Jammernegg, Werner & Kischka, Peter & Silbermayr, Lena, 2024. "Risk preferences, newsvendor orders and supply chain coordination using the Mean-CVaR model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    3. Wang, Ke & Wei, Yi-Ming & Huang, Zhimin, 2016. "Potential gains from carbon emissions trading in China: A DEA based estimation on abatement cost savings," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 48-59.
    4. Cai, Gangshu (George) & Zhang, Zhe George & Zhang, Michael, 2009. "Game theoretical perspectives on dual-channel supply chain competition with price discounts and pricing schemes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 80-96, January.
    5. Nagurney, Anna & Ke, Ke, 2006. "Financial networks with intermediation: Risk management with variable weights," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(1), pages 40-63, July.
    6. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    7. Shigui Ma & Yong He & Ran Gu, 2023. "Low-carbon tourism supply chain network optimisation with vertical and horizontal cooperations," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(18), pages 6251-6270, September.
    8. Hao Zou & Jin Qin & Xiaofeng Long, 2022. "Coordination Decisions for a Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering Risk Aversion under Carbon Quota Policy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-24, February.
    9. Song, Xiang & Wang, Dingyu & Zhang, Xuantao & He, Yuan & Wang, Yong, 2022. "A comparison of the operation of China's carbon trading market and energy market and their spillover effects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    10. Ahmad Rezaee & Farzad Dehghanian & Behnam Fahimnia & Benita Beamon, 2017. "Green supply chain network design with stochastic demand and carbon price," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 250(2), pages 463-485, March.
    11. Qi Qi & Jing Wang & Jianteng Xu, 2018. "A Dual-Channel Supply Chain Coordination under Carbon Cap-and-Trade Regulation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, June.
    12. Yu, Min & Nagurney, Anna, 2013. "Competitive food supply chain networks with application to fresh produce," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(2), pages 273-282.
    13. Liang Liu & Futou Li & Ershi Qi, 2019. "Research on Risk Avoidance and Coordination of Supply Chain Subject Based on Blockchain Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, April.
    14. Nagurney, Anna & Dong, June & Zhang, Ding, 2002. "A supply chain network equilibrium model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 281-303, September.
    15. Yao, Dong-Qing & Liu, John J., 2005. "Competitive pricing of mixed retail and e-tail distribution channels," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 235-247, June.
    16. Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell & Uryasev, Stanislav, 2002. "Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1443-1471, July.
    17. Opoku, Eric Evans Osei & Boachie, Micheal Kofi, 2020. "The environmental impact of industrialization and foreign direct investment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chan, Chi Kin & Zhou, Yan & Wong, Kar Hung, 2019. "An equilibrium model of the supply chain network under multi-attribute behaviors analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 514-535.
    2. Zhou, Yan & Chan, Chi Kin & Wong, Kar Hung, 2018. "A multi-period supply chain network equilibrium model considering retailers’ uncertain demands and dynamic loss-averse behaviors," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 51-76.
    3. Li, Bo & Hou, Peng-Wen & Chen, Ping & Li, Qing-Hua, 2016. "Pricing strategy and coordination in a dual channel supply chain with a risk-averse retailer," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 154-168.
    4. Jia Liu & Cuixia Li, 2023. "Dynamic Game Analysis on Cooperative Advertising Strategy in a Manufacturer-Led Supply Chain with Risk Aversion," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, January.
    5. Brian Tomlin & Yimin Wang, 2005. "On the Value of Mix Flexibility and Dual Sourcing in Unreliable Newsvendor Networks," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 37-57, June.
    6. Nagurney, Anna, 2021. "Supply chain game theory network modeling under labor constraints: Applications to the Covid-19 pandemic," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 880-891.
    7. Zhen-Zheng Zhang & Zong-Jun Wang & Li-Wen Liu, 2015. "Retail Services and Pricing Decisions in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Remanufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-24, February.
    8. Chen Wei & Sobhan Asian & Gurdal Ertek & Zhi-Hua Hu, 2020. "Location-based pricing and channel selection in a supply chain: a case study from the food retail industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 959-984, August.
    9. E. Allevi & A. Gnudi & I. V. Konnov & G. Oggioni, 2018. "Evaluating the effects of environmental regulations on a closed-loop supply chain network: a variational inequality approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 261(1), pages 1-43, February.
    10. Dominique Guegan & Bertrand K Hassani, 2014. "Distortion Risk Measures or the Transformation of Unimodal Distributions into Multimodal Functions," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 14008, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    11. Li, Mengmeng & Mizuno, Shinji, 2022. "Dynamic pricing and inventory management of a dual-channel supply chain under different power structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 273-285.
    12. Seyed Jafar Sadjadi & Hashem Asadi & Ramin Sadeghian & Hadi Sahebi, 2018. "Retailer Stackelberg game in a supply chain with pricing and service decisions and simple price discount contract," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, April.
    13. Li Chen & Simai He & Shuzhong Zhang, 2011. "Tight Bounds for Some Risk Measures, with Applications to Robust Portfolio Selection," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(4), pages 847-865, August.
    14. Ping Shi & Bo Yan & Jun Zhao, 2020. "Appropriate timing for SMEs to introduce an Internet-based online channel under uncertain operating costs: a real options analysis," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 969-999, December.
    15. Fulga, Cristinca, 2016. "Portfolio optimization with disutility-based risk measure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 541-553.
    16. Han, Xiaoya & Liu, Xin, 2020. "Equilibrium decisions for multi-firms considering consumer quality preference," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    17. Gilles Boevi Koumou & Georges Dionne, 2022. "Coherent Diversification Measures in Portfolio Theory: An Axiomatic Foundation," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, October.
    18. Adam Krzemienowski, 2009. "Risk preference modeling with conditional average: an application to portfolio optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 67-95, January.
    19. Wu, Xin & Nie, Lei & Xu, Meng & Yan, Fei, 2018. "A perishable food supply chain problem considering demand uncertainty and time deadline constraints: Modeling and application to a high-speed railway catering service," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 186-209.
    20. Eeckhoudt, Louis & Fiori, Anna Maria & Rosazza Gianin, Emanuela, 2016. "Loss-averse preferences and portfolio choices: An extension," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(1), pages 224-230.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2557-:d:1612212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.