IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p2304-d1606736.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Critical Review of Residents’ Satisfaction in Urban Village Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaoyang Chu

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia)

  • Sittimont Kanjanabootra

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia)

  • Waiching Tang

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia)

Abstract

Urban village redevelopment plays an important role in advancing sustainable and inclusive urbanization, aligning with global and national priorities, including China’s five-year plans. Residents’ satisfaction is one of the important measures of the success of urban village development. This review focuses on residents’ satisfaction in urban villages in China and its correlation to the SDGs rather than analyzing urban village transformation itself. This review employs a dual-method approach: a traditional review identifies the characteristics of urban village development phases, and a systematic review examines the indicators influencing residents’ satisfaction and their alignment with Sustainable Development Goals. This study highlights critical indicators influencing residents’ satisfaction, such as building quality, green space, and sense of security, and the changing trends in the value of these indicators through different urban village development phases. The findings reveal significant challenges, including housing affordability, governance methods, and social cohesion, emphasizing the need for redevelopment strategies to be aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to promote equity and create sustainable urban environments. This review provides valuable insights for policymakers and urban planners, offering a framework for providing a knowledge base to understand the dynamics of satisfaction and support sustainable urban regeneration.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaoyang Chu & Sittimont Kanjanabootra & Waiching Tang, 2025. "A Critical Review of Residents’ Satisfaction in Urban Village Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2304-:d:1606736
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2304/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2304/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu Chen & Yunxiao Dang & Guanpeng Dong, 2020. "An investigation of migrants’ residential satisfaction in Beijing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(3), pages 563-582, February.
    2. Qing Yang & Chaozheng Zhang, 2023. "How Does the Renewal of Urban Villages Affect the Resettled Villagers’ Subjective Well-Being? A Case Study in Wuhan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Pu Hao & Stan Geertman & Pieter Hooimeijer & Richard Sliuzas, 2013. "Spatial Analyses of the Urban Village Development Process in Shenzhen, China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 2177-2197, November.
    4. Ya Ping Wang & Yanglin Wang & Jiansheng Wu, 2009. "Urbanization and Informal Development in China: Urban Villages in Shenzhen," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 957-973, December.
    5. Shuyang Li & Fei Qu, 2022. "Preserving Authenticity in Urban Regeneration: A Framework for the New Definition from the Perspective of Multi-Subject Stakeholders—A Case Study of Nantou in Shenzhen, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Pan, Wenjian & Du, Juan, 2021. "Towards sustainable urban transition: A critical review of strategies and policies of urban village renewal in Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yue Wu & Yi Zhang, 2022. "Formal and Informal Planning-Dominated Urban Village Development: A Comparative Study of Luojiazhuang and Yangjiapailou in Hangzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Lin Jiang & Yani Lai & Ke Chen & Xiao Tang, 2022. "What Drives Urban Village Redevelopment in China? A Survey of Literature Based on Web of Science Core Collection Database," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Yue Wu & Yi Zhang & Zexu Han & Siyuan Zhang & Xiangyi Li, 2022. "Examining the Planning Policies of Urban Villages Guided by China’s New-Type Urbanization: A Case Study of Hangzhou City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-25, December.
    4. Ni Zhang & Li Zhu & Jiang Li & Yilin Sun & Xiaokang Wang & Honglin Wu, 2023. "The Spatial Interface of Informal Settlements to Women’s Safety: A Human-Scale Measurement for the Largest Urban Village in Changsha, Hunan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Jiang, Yanpeng & Mohabir, Nalini & Ma, Renfeng & Wu, Lichao & Chen, Mingxing, 2020. "Whose village? Stakeholder interests in the urban renewal of Hubei old village in Shenzhen," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    6. Pan, Wenjian & Du, Juan, 2021. "Towards sustainable urban transition: A critical review of strategies and policies of urban village renewal in Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    7. Jinkun Yang & Linchuan Yang & Haitao Ma, 2022. "Community Participation Strategy for Sustainable Urban Regeneration in Xiamen, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, April.
    8. Shen, Tiyan & Yao, Xinyi & Wen, Fenghua, 2021. "The Urban Regeneration Engine Model: An analytical framework and case study of the renewal of old communities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    9. Fu, Yang & Zhang, Xiaoling, 2018. "Two faces of an eco-city? Sustainability transition and territorial rescaling of a new town in Zhuhai," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 627-636.
    10. Hui Fang Cong, 2012. "Urban villagesí Redevelopments in Weihai China: Physical and Social Changes," ERES eres2012_384, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    11. Shuyang Li & Fei Qu, 2022. "Preserving Authenticity in Urban Regeneration: A Framework for the New Definition from the Perspective of Multi-Subject Stakeholders—A Case Study of Nantou in Shenzhen, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-16, July.
    12. Fulong Wu, 2020. "Adding new narratives to the urban imagination: An introduction to ‘New directions of urban studies in China’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(3), pages 459-472, February.
    13. Ju He & Yunxiao Dang & Wenzhong Zhang & Li Chen, 2020. "Perception of Urban Public Safety of Floating Population with Higher Education Background: Evidence from Urban China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-16, November.
    14. Dinghuan Yuan & Yung Yau & Haijun Bao & Yongshen Liu & Ting Liu, 2019. "Anatomizing the Institutional Arrangements of Urban Village Redevelopment: Case Studies in Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, June.
    15. Lin, Wanlin & Lin, George C.S., 2023. "Strategizing actors and agents in the functioning of informal property Rights: The tragicomedy of the extralegal housing market in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    16. Jihong Li & Rongxu Qiu & Kaiming Li & Wei Xu, 2018. "Informal Land Development on the Urban Fringe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, January.
    17. Jun Zhang & Runni Zhang & Qilun Li & Xue Zhang & Xiong He, 2023. "Spatial Sifferentiation and Differentiated Development Paths of Traditional Villages in Yunnan Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, August.
    18. Lai, Yani & Wang, Jiayuan & Lok, Waiming, 2017. "Redefining property rights over collective land in the urban redevelopment of Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 485-493.
    19. Weixuan Chen & Ali Cheshmehzangi & Eugenio Mangi & Timothy Heath, 2022. "Implementations of China’s New-Type Urbanisation: A Comparative Analysis between Targets and Practices of Key Elements’ Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, May.
    20. Changzheng Gao & Juepin Hou & Yanchen Ma & Jianxin Yang, 2022. "Evaluation and Analysis of Design Elements for Sustainable Renewal of Urban Vulnerable Spaces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-14, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2304-:d:1606736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.