IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i24p16596-d999397.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the Planning Policies of Urban Villages Guided by China’s New-Type Urbanization: A Case Study of Hangzhou City

Author

Listed:
  • Yue Wu

    (Department of Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    International Center for Architecture & Urban Development Studies, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    China Institute for New Urbanization Studies, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Yi Zhang

    (Department of Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Zexu Han

    (Department of Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Siyuan Zhang

    (Department of Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Xiangyi Li

    (Department of Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

Abstract

Planning policies have greatly influenced the development of urban villages, an informal phenomenon in which rural settlements are encircled by urban environments during China’s rapid urbanization process. “The National New-type Urbanization Plan (2014–2020)” of China initiated in 2014 provides a new perspective on planning policy research on China’ urban villages. Hangzhou, a pioneer city that adopts new-type urbanization in China and combines the characteristics of rapid urban growth, mountainous urban terrains, and a long cultural history, serves as a typical case study to compare the planning policies responding to the informality of urban villages guided by traditional and new-type urbanization. This study employed the content analysis method to analyze the evolution of Hangzhou’s planning policies of urban villages since the reform and opening up and used one-way ANOVA to analyze the differences in rental levels among the urban villages developed under the planning policies of different urbanization stages, aiming to compare the influences of planning policies guided by traditional and new-type urbanization on urban village development. The results indicate that the policies allowing some degree of informality in the new-type urbanization stage achieve a higher rental level for urban villages than the policies of the traditional urbanization stages that restrict and prevent informality. The findings of this research suggest that informality may provide advantages that formality cannot replace and provides important policy implications for rapidly urbanizing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Yue Wu & Yi Zhang & Zexu Han & Siyuan Zhang & Xiangyi Li, 2022. "Examining the Planning Policies of Urban Villages Guided by China’s New-Type Urbanization: A Case Study of Hangzhou City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-25, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16596-:d:999397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16596/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16596/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yue Wu & Yi Zhang, 2022. "Formal and Informal Planning-Dominated Urban Village Development: A Comparative Study of Luojiazhuang and Yangjiapailou in Hangzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Chimhowu, Admos, 2019. "The ‘new’ African customary land tenure. Characteristic, features and policy implications of a new paradigm," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 897-903.
    3. Xuanyi Nie, 2021. "Empowering informal settlements in Jakarta with urban agriculture: exploring a community-based approach," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 325-339, May.
    4. Yuan, Dinghuan & Yau, Yung & Bao, Haijun & Lin, Wenyi, 2020. "A Framework for Understanding the Institutional Arrangements of Urban Village Redevelopment Projects in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    5. Siu Wai Wong & Bo‐Sin Tang & Jinlong Liu, 2018. "Village Redevelopment and Desegregation as a Strategy for Metropolitan Development: Some Lessons from Guangzhou City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(6), pages 1064-1079, November.
    6. Kong, Xuesong & Liu, Yaolin & Jiang, Ping & Tian, Yasi & Zou, Yafeng, 2018. "A novel framework for rural homestead land transfer under collective ownership in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 138-146.
    7. Ya Ping Wang & Yanglin Wang & Jiansheng Wu, 2009. "Urbanization and Informal Development in China: Urban Villages in Shenzhen," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 957-973, December.
    8. Li Tian, 2008. "The Chengzhongcun Land Market in China: Boon or Bane? — A Perspective on Property Rights," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 282-304, June.
    9. Colin McFarlane, 2012. "Rethinking Informality: Politics, Crisis, and the City," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 89-108.
    10. Nicola Banks & Melanie Lombard & Diana Mitlin, 2020. "Urban Informality as a Site of Critical Analysis," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(2), pages 223-238, February.
    11. Edgars Pudzis & Sanda Geipele & Armands Auzins & Andrejs Lazdins & Jevgenija Butnicka & Krista Krumina & Indra Ciuksa & Maris Kalinka & Una Krutova & Mark Grimitliht & Marii Prii-Pärn & Charlotta Björ, 2021. "Evaluation of Formal and Informal Spatial Coastal Area Planning Process in Baltic Sea Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-19, May.
    12. David L. Brown & Mark Shucksmith, 2017. "Reconsidering Territorial Governance to Account for Enhanced Rural-Urban Interdependence in America," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 672(1), pages 282-301, July.
    13. Pan, Wenjian & Du, Juan, 2021. "Towards sustainable urban transition: A critical review of strategies and policies of urban village renewal in Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Honglian Hua & Jin Sun & Zhumei Yang, 2024. "Rural Self-Organizing Resilience: Village Collective Strategies and Negotiation Paths in Urbanization Process in the TPSNT Framework: A Case Study of the Hongren Village, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-25, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yue Wu & Yi Zhang, 2022. "Formal and Informal Planning-Dominated Urban Village Development: A Comparative Study of Luojiazhuang and Yangjiapailou in Hangzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Lin Jiang & Yani Lai & Ke Chen & Xiao Tang, 2022. "What Drives Urban Village Redevelopment in China? A Survey of Literature Based on Web of Science Core Collection Database," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Keying Han & Shitai Bao & Meixuan She & Qixin Pan & Yina Liu & Biao Chen, 2023. "Exploration of Intelligent Building Planning for Urban Renewal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Pan, Wenjian & Du, Juan, 2021. "Towards sustainable urban transition: A critical review of strategies and policies of urban village renewal in Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    5. Martine El Ouardi & Françoise Montambeault, 2023. "COLLECTIVELY GARDENING THE URBAN PUBLIC SPACE IN MEXICO CITY: When Informal Practices Interact with the State," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 201-220, March.
    6. Dinghuan Yuan & Yung Yau & Haijun Bao & Yongshen Liu & Ting Liu, 2019. "Anatomizing the Institutional Arrangements of Urban Village Redevelopment: Case Studies in Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Richard Kiaka & Shiela Chikulo & Sacha Slootheer & Paul Hebinck, 2021. "“The street is ours”. A comparative analysis of street trading, Covid-19 and new street geographies in Harare, Zimbabwe and Kisumu, Kenya," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(5), pages 1263-1281, October.
    8. Fulong Wu, 2009. "Land Development, Inequality and Urban Villages in China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 885-889, December.
    9. Chihsin Chiu, 2024. "Greening informality through metabolic coordination: An urban political ecology of governing extralegal housing forms in Taiwan," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(6), pages 1127-1146, May.
    10. Pengyu Zhu, 2016. "Residential segregation and employment outcomes of rural migrant workers in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(8), pages 1635-1656, June.
    11. Ye Liu & Zhigang Li & Yuqi Liu & Hongsheng Chen, 2015. "Growth of rural migrant enclaves in Guangzhou, China: Agency, everyday practice and social mobility," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(16), pages 3086-3105, December.
    12. Youliang Guo & Chengguo Zhang & Ya Ping Wang & Xun Li, 2018. "(De-)Activating the growth machine for redevelopment: The case of Liede urban village in Guangzhou," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(7), pages 1420-1438, May.
    13. Webster, Chris & Wu, Fulong & Zhang, Fangzhu & Sarkar, Chinmoy, 2016. "Informality, property rights, and poverty in China’s “favelas”," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 461-476.
    14. Tellman, Beth & Eakin, Hallie & Janssen, Marco A. & de Alba, Felipe & Turner II, B.L., 2021. "The role of institutional entrepreneurs and informal land transactions in Mexico City’s urban expansion," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    15. Yani Lai & Edwin Hon Wan Chan & Lennon Choy, 2017. "Village-led land development under state-led institutional arrangements in urbanising China: The case of Shenzhen," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(7), pages 1736-1759, May.
    16. Eakin, Hallie & Keele, Svenja & Lueck, Vanessa, 2022. "Uncomfortable knowledge: Mechanisms of urban development in adaptation governance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    17. João Tonucci, 2023. "PROPERTY‐LED INFORMALITY: Shifting Informal Land Development from Popular Housing to Middle‐Class and Elite Speculation in Belo Horizonte," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 527-545, July.
    18. Yi Jin & Yimin Zhao, 2022. "THE INFORMAL CONSTITUTION OF STATE CENTRALITY: Governing Street Businesses in (Post‐)Pandemic Chengdu, China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 631-650, July.
    19. Qing Yang & Yan Song & Yinying Cai, 2020. "Blending Bottom-Up and Top-Down Urban Village Redevelopment Modes: Comparing Multidimensional Welfare Changes of Resettled Households in Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    20. Ni Zhang & Li Zhu & Jiang Li & Yilin Sun & Xiaokang Wang & Honglin Wu, 2023. "The Spatial Interface of Informal Settlements to Women’s Safety: A Human-Scale Measurement for the Largest Urban Village in Changsha, Hunan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16596-:d:999397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.