IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i1p128-d125956.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Informal Land Development on the Urban Fringe

Author

Listed:
  • Jihong Li

    (Forestry College Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Rongxu Qiu

    (City Planning, City of Edmonton, Edmonton, AB T5J0J4, Canada)

  • Kaiming Li

    (Department of Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Wei Xu

    (Department of Geography, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB T1K6T5, Canada)

Abstract

Urban fringes are an important part of urban growth. In addition to formal land markets, a variety of informal land development methods make urban fringes the most dynamic and complicated areas. The analysis of land transfer and development systems in these areas opens a significant window to understanding the modern processes of urbanization and human and property rights in urban areas in China. This study uses Shanghai as a case study target and identifies specific modes of local land development and investigates how collective participants, government agencies, regulatory policies, and various actors are involved in land development and decision making. The in-depth analysis and case studies indicate that the variety of informal land markets in Shanghai reflects the inherent demands of the market for allocation of land resources within the constraints of the given system and against the given development background. However, conflicts between the mode of the market and the existing institutional constraints reflect the uncoordinated development of the land and the economic and social development around the urban fringe. The empirical results of this paper suggest that government administration should improve the land market system, strengthen the planning of control and guidance, rationalize the distribution of interests in land development, and strengthen the supervision of management of land development enterprises. Instead of fragmented aspects, this paper proposes a systematic analytical approach to understanding the informal land development in a city from an urban planning and land resource management perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Jihong Li & Rongxu Qiu & Kaiming Li & Wei Xu, 2018. "Informal Land Development on the Urban Fringe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:128-:d:125956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/1/128/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/1/128/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chengri Ding & Erik Lichtenberg, 2011. "Land And Urban Economic Growth In China," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 299-317, May.
    2. K K Wong & X B Zhao, 1999. "The Influence of Bureaucratic Behavior on Land Apportionment in China: The Informal Process," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 17(1), pages 113-125, February.
    3. Laurence J. C. Ma & Ming Fan, 1994. "Urbanisation from Below: The Growth of Towns in Jiangsu, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 31(10), pages 1625-1645, December.
    4. Ya Ping Wang & Yanglin Wang & Jiansheng Wu, 2009. "Urbanization and Informal Development in China: Urban Villages in Shenzhen," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 957-973, December.
    5. Chengri Ding, 2004. "Urban Spatial Development in the Land Policy Reform Era: Evidence from Beijing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(10), pages 1889-1907, September.
    6. Wei Xu, 2004. "The Changing Dynamics of Land-Use Change in Rural China: A Case Study of Yuhang, Zhejiang Province," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(9), pages 1595-1615, September.
    7. Yanpeng Jiang & Paul Waley & Sara Gonzalez, 2016. "Shanghai swings: The Hongqiao project and competitive urbanism in the Yangtze River Delta," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(10), pages 1928-1947, October.
    8. Yu Zhu, 2000. "In Situ Urbanization in Rural China: Case Studies from Fujian Province," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 31(2), pages 413-434, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jihong Li & Kaiming Li & Rongxu Qiu, 2022. "The Suburbanization and Revitalization of Industrial Land in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Xi Chen & Dawei Xu & Safa Fadelelseed & Lianying Li, 2019. "Spatiotemporal Analysis and Control of Landscape Eco-Security at the Urban Fringe in Shrinking Resource Cities: A Case Study in Daqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-26, November.
    3. Yahui Wang, 2019. "What Affects Participation in the Farmland Rental Market in Rural China? Evidence from CHARLS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Dadashpoor, Hashem & Ahani, Somayeh, 2019. "Land tenure-related conflicts in peri-urban areas: A review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 218-229.
    5. Yahui Wang & Liangjie Xin & Haozhe Zhang & Yuanqing Li, 2019. "An Estimation of the Extent of Rent-Free Farmland Transfer and Its Driving Forces in Rural China: A Multilevel Logit Model Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiang Xu & Anthony Yeh & Fulong Wu, 2009. "Land Commodification: New Land Development and Politics in China since the Late 1990s," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 890-913, December.
    2. Rongxu Qiu & Wei Xu & John Zhang & Karl Staenz, 2018. "Modeling and simulating industrial land-use evolution in Shanghai, China," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 57-83, January.
    3. Iris Claus & Les Oxley & Jie Chen & Xuehui Han, 2014. "The Evolution Of The Housing Market And Its Socioeconomic Impacts In The Post-Reform People'S Republic Of China: A Survey Of The Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 652-670, September.
    4. Gyourko, Joseph & Shen, Yang & Wu, Jing & Zhang, Rongjie, 2022. "Land finance in China: Analysis and review," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    5. Pan, Wenjian & Du, Juan, 2021. "Towards sustainable urban transition: A critical review of strategies and policies of urban village renewal in Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    6. Han, Wenjing & Zhang, Xiaoling & Zheng, Xian, 2020. "Land use regulation and urban land value: Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Paul L. G. Vlek & Asia Khamzina & Hossein Azadi & Anik Bhaduri & Luna Bharati & Ademola Braimoh & Christopher Martius & Terry Sunderland & Fatemeh Taheri, 2017. "Trade-Offs in Multi-Purpose Land Use under Land Degradation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Tang, Peng & Feng, Yue & Li, Min & Zhang, Yanyan, 2021. "Can the performance evaluation change from central government suppress illegal land use in local governments? A new interpretation of Chinese decentralisation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    9. Wang, Chengchao & Yang, Yusheng & Zhang, Yaoqi, 2012. "Rural household livelihood change, fuelwood substitution, and hilly ecosystem restoration: Evidence from China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2475-2482.
    10. Yitian Ren, 2023. "Rural China Staggering towards the Digital Era: Evolution and Restructuring," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, July.
    11. Lin, Tao & Wang, Donggen & Zhou, Meng, 2018. "Residential relocation and changes in travel behavior: what is the role of social context change?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 360-374.
    12. Zhonghua Huang & Xuejun Du, 2017. "Strategic interaction in local governments’ industrial land supply: Evidence from China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(6), pages 1328-1346, May.
    13. Bryan Jones & Deborah Balk & Stefan Leyk, 2020. "Urban Change in the United States, 1990–2010: A Spatial Assessment of Administrative Reclassification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, February.
    14. Yu, Zhenning & Wu, Cifang & Tan, Yongzhong & Zhang, Xiaobin, 2018. "The dilemma of land expansion and governance in rural China: A comparative study based on three townships in Zhejiang Province," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 602-611.
    15. Partha Mukhopadhyay & Marie‐Hélène Zérah & Eric Denis, 2020. "Subaltern Urbanization: Indian Insights for Urban Theory," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 582-598, July.
    16. Chengchao Wang & Yaoqi Zhang & Yecheng Xu & Qichun Yang, 2015. "Is the “Ecological and Economic Approach for the Restoration of Collapsed Gullies” in Southern China Really Economic?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-16, July.
    17. Shen, Tiyan & Yao, Xinyi & Wen, Fenghua, 2021. "The Urban Regeneration Engine Model: An analytical framework and case study of the renewal of old communities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    18. Lin Jiang & Yani Lai & Ke Chen & Xiao Tang, 2022. "What Drives Urban Village Redevelopment in China? A Survey of Literature Based on Web of Science Core Collection Database," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    19. Fu, Yang & Zhang, Xiaoling, 2018. "Two faces of an eco-city? Sustainability transition and territorial rescaling of a new town in Zhuhai," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 627-636.
    20. Weiping Zhang & Peiji Shi & Huali Tong, 2022. "Research on Construction Land Use Benefit and the Coupling Coordination Relationship Based on a Three-Dimensional Frame Model—A Case Study in the Lanzhou-Xining Urban Agglomeration," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:128-:d:125956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.