IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p2002-d1600224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

More Sustainable but More Dangerous Cities: The Role of Communication Campaigns in Protecting Vulnerable Road Users

Author

Listed:
  • Mireia Faus

    (University Research Institute on Traffic and Road Safety (INTRAS), University of Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Francisco Alonso

    (University Research Institute on Traffic and Road Safety (INTRAS), University of Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Cristina Esteban

    (University Research Institute on Traffic and Road Safety (INTRAS), University of Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • José Luis Velarte

    (University Research Institute on Traffic and Road Safety (INTRAS), University of Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

The transition towards a sustainable mobility model encourages an increase in the use of soft modes of transport, and thus an increase in the number of vulnerable road users, especially in urban areas. In Spain, this group of users, comprising pedestrians, cyclists, users of personal mobility vehicles and motorcyclists, accounted for 62,258 victims in road accidents in 2023, 46% of the total, with 7258 dead or seriously injured representing 65.6% of the total. Different strategies to protect vulnerable road users, including communication campaigns, are regularly developed to increase safe travel behaviour. In this context, this study analyses the campaigns issued by the Directorate General of Traffic since 1960 aimed at vulnerable road users. Only 28 campaigns met the established inclusion criteria, representing 23.5% of the total. Thus, the period 2011–2024 has seen the lowest prevalence of this type of campaign, coinciding with a context characterised by the emergence of new forms of micro-mobility that are more sustainable but also more exposed to risks. Due to this complex environment, it is recommended to increase the prevalence of campaigns targeted at vulnerable users and to maximise their effectiveness using emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and big data, and delivered through a combination of traditional and digital media.

Suggested Citation

  • Mireia Faus & Francisco Alonso & Cristina Esteban & José Luis Velarte, 2025. "More Sustainable but More Dangerous Cities: The Role of Communication Campaigns in Protecting Vulnerable Road Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2002-:d:1600224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2002/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2002/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susana García-Herrero & Juan Diego Febres & Wafa Boulagouas & José Manuel Gutiérrez & Miguel Ángel Mariscal Saldaña, 2021. "Assessment of the Influence of Technology-Based Distracted Driving on Drivers’ Infractions and Their Subsequent Impact on Traffic Accidents Severity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Pol Felipe-Falgas & Cristina Madrid-Lopez & Oriol Marquet, 2022. "Assessing Environmental Performance of Micromobility Using LCA and Self-Reported Modal Change: The Case of Shared E-Bikes, E-Scooters, and E-Mopeds in Barcelona," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Giuffrida, Nadia & Pilla, Francesco & Carroll, Páraic, 2023. "The social sustainability of cycling: Assessing equity in the accessibility of bike-sharing services," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    4. Nikiforiadis, Andreas & Paschalidis, Evangelos & Stamatiadis, Nikiforos & Paloka, Ntonata & Tsekoura, Eleni & Basbas, Socrates, 2023. "E-scooters and other mode trip chaining: Preferences and attitudes of university students," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Sanders, Rebecca L. & Schneider, Robert J. & Proulx, Frank R., 2022. "Pedestrian fatalities in darkness: What do we know, and what can be done?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 23-39.
    6. Lanzendorf, Martin & Busch-Geertsema, Annika, 2014. "The cycling boom in large German cities—Empirical evidence for successful cycling campaigns," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 26-33.
    7. Daniela Santilli & Mauro D’Apuzzo & Azzurra Evangelisti & Vittorio Nicolosi, 2021. "Towards Sustainability: New Tools for Planning Urban Pedestrian Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Shiva Pourfalatoun & Jubaer Ahmed & Erika E. Miller, 2023. "Shared Electric Scooter Users and Non-Users: Perceptions on Safety, Adoption and Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, June.
    9. Md Mostafizur Rahman Komol & Md Mahmudul Hasan & Mohammed Elhenawy & Shamsunnahar Yasmin & Mahmoud Masoud & Andry Rakotonirainy, 2021. "Crash severity analysis of vulnerable road users using machine learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-22, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Synek, Stefan & Koenigstorfer, Joerg, 2018. "Exploring adoption determinants of tax-subsidized company-leasing bicycles from the perspective of German employers and employees," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 238-260.
    2. Molloy, Joseph & Schatzmann, Thomas & Schoeman, Beaumont & Tchervenkov, Christopher & Hintermann, Beat & Axhausen, Kay W., 2021. "Observed impacts of the Covid-19 first wave on travel behaviour in Switzerland based on a large GPS panel," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 43-51.
    3. Hamid Mostofi & Houshmand Masoumi & Hans-Liudger Dienel, 2020. "The Association between the Regular Use of ICT Based Mobility Services and the Bicycle Mode Choice in Tehran and Cairo," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Yin, Rumeng & He, Jiang, 2023. "Design of a photovoltaic electric bike battery-sharing system in public transit stations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    5. Hudde, Ansgar, 2022. "The unequal cycling boom in Germany," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    6. Hudde, Ansgar, 2023. "Have Cycling-Friendly Cities Achieved Cycling Equity? Analyses of the Educational Gradient in Cycling in Dutch and German Cities," SocArXiv 7c6d2_v1, Center for Open Science.
    7. Chrysanthi Mastora & Evangelos Paschalidis & Andreas Nikiforiadis & Socrates Basbas, 2023. "Pedestrian Crossings as a Means of Reducing Conflicts between Cyclists and Pedestrians in Shared Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, June.
    8. Shuang Luo & Xinxin Yi & Yiming Shao & Jin Xu, 2022. "Effects of Distracting Behaviors on Driving Workload and Driving Performance in a City Scenario," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-14, November.
    9. Cunha, Isabel & Silva, Cecília & Büttner, Benjamin & Toivonen, Tuuli, 2024. "Pursuing cycling equity? A mixed-methods analysis of cycling plans in European cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 237-246.
    10. Yong Lei & Jun Zhang & Zhihua Ren, 2023. "A Study on Bicycle-Sharing Dispatching Station Site Selection and Planning Based on Multivariate Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-25, August.
    11. Thomas Klinger & Martin Lanzendorf, 2016. "Moving between mobility cultures: what affects the travel behavior of new residents?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 243-271, March.
    12. Sonja Haustein & Maarten Kroesen & Ismir Mulalic, 2020. "Cycling culture and socialisation: modelling the effect of immigrant origin on cycling in Denmark and the Netherlands," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1689-1709, August.
    13. Sebastian Rühmann & Stephan Leible & Tom Lewandowski, 2024. "Interpretable Bike-Sharing Activity Prediction with a Temporal Fusion Transformer to Unveil Influential Factors: A Case Study in Hamburg, Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-32, April.
    14. Yiwei Bai & Yihang Bai & Ruoyu Wang & Tianren Yang & Xinyao Song & Bo Bai, 2023. "Exploring Associations between the Built Environment and Cycling Behaviour around Urban Greenways from a Human-Scale Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.
    15. Adsule, Poonam & Kadali, B Raghuram, 2024. "Analysis of contributing factors in decision to bicycle in developing countries context," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 50-58.
    16. Kang, Seongmin & Chung, Yongjin & Yang, Byungsoo & Lee, Hyukseong & Lee, Jun & Kim, Jinhee, 2024. "User preference and willingness-to-pay for operation strategies that enhance safety and convenience of E-scooter sharing services," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 31-41.
    17. Medina-Molina, Cayetano & Pérez-Macías, Noemí & Fernández-Fernádez, José Luis, 2023. "The use of micromobility in different contexts. An explanation through the multilevel perspective and QCA," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    18. Cheng Peng & Chenxiao Ma & Yunhao Dong, 2023. "Unravelling the Formation Mechanism of Sustainable Underground Pedestrian Systems: Two Case Studies in Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-23, August.
    19. Frondel, Manuel & Vance, Colin, 2017. "Cycling on the extensive and intensive margin: The role of paths and prices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 21-31.
    20. Luqi Wang, 2018. "Barriers to Implementing Pro-Cycling Policies: A Case Study of Hamburg," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2002-:d:1600224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.