IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p1848-d1596922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fostering Technology Adoption and Management Advancements in Environmental Performance: Mediation of Circular Economy and Sustainability-Oriented Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Viktor Koval

    (Department of Business and Tourism Management, Izmail State University of Humanities, 68601 Izmail, Ukraine)

  • Nikola Abramović

    (Faculty of Business Economics and Law, “Adriatic” University, 16 Rista Lekića, 85000 Bar, Montenegro)

  • Sandra Đurović

    (Faculty of Business Economics and Law, “Adriatic” University, 16 Rista Lekića, 85000 Bar, Montenegro)

  • Dejana Crvenica

    (Faculty of Business Economics and Law, “Adriatic” University, 16 Rista Lekića, 85000 Bar, Montenegro)

  • I Wayan Edi Arsawan

    (Department of Business Administration, Politeknik Negeri Bali, Tuban 80364, Indonesia)

Abstract

This study aims to address a research gap by analyzing the role of technology adoption as a determinant of the circular economy in relation to sustainability-oriented innovation and environmental performance. This study uses an advanced structural equation modeling (SEM-PLS) approach to address methodological rigor issues, including multigroup analysis and bootstrap methods to ensure reliability and validity. Data were collected from 201 Indonesian SMEs, and 603 responses were collected and analyzed using structural equation modeling. The findings indicate that technology adoption contributes significantly to the circular economy and sustainability-oriented innovation but is insignificant to environmental performance. Furthermore, the circular economy and sustainability-oriented innovation are key to improving environmental performance. This study presents an advanced mediation model using serial mediation analysis with bias-corrected confidence intervals to ensure methodological robustness. This study develops a theoretical framework by integrating the natural resource-based view (NRBV), environmental concern theory, and stakeholder theory in the context of SMEs, providing a more comprehensive overview for understanding the mechanisms of environmental conservation. The results also highlighted the role of the circular economy and sustainability-oriented innovation as serial mediators in the relationship between technology adoption and environmental performance. In terms of theoretical implications, this study incorporates the natural resource-based view, environmental concern theory, and stakeholder theory to improve our understanding of environmental conservation. In terms of managerial contribution, the main implication for SME managers is to invest in sustainable practices by focusing on circular practices and improving the understanding of efforts to improve environmental performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Viktor Koval & Nikola Abramović & Sandra Đurović & Dejana Crvenica & I Wayan Edi Arsawan, 2025. "Fostering Technology Adoption and Management Advancements in Environmental Performance: Mediation of Circular Economy and Sustainability-Oriented Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1848-:d:1596922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1848/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1848/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Phil Brown & Nancy Bocken & Ruud Balkenende, 2019. "Why Do Companies Pursue Collaborative Circular Oriented Innovation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Rehman, Shafique Ur & Kraus, Sascha & Shah, Syed Asim & Khanin, Dmitry & Mahto, Raj V., 2021. "Analyzing the relationship between green innovation and environmental performance in large manufacturing firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    3. Maha Faisal Alsayegh & Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Saeid Homayoun, 2020. "Corporate Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability Performance Transformation through ESG Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Cheffi, Walid & Kaleem Zahir-ul-Hassan, Muhammad & Omer Farooq, Muhammad & Baqrain, Abdelrahman & Mohamed Habib Mansour, Mourad, 2023. "Ethical leadership, management control systems and circular economy in SMEs in an emerging economy, the UAE," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    5. Corinna Vera Hedwig Schmidt & Bastian Kindermann & Cassian Felix Behlau & Tessa Christina Flatten, 2021. "Understanding the effect of market orientation on circular economy practices: The mediating role of closed‐loop orientation in German SMEs," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 4171-4187, December.
    6. Shashi, & Centobelli, Piera & Cerchione, Roberto & Singh, Rajwinder, 2019. "The impact of leanness and innovativeness on environmental and financial performance: Insights from Indian SMEs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 111-124.
    7. Ricky Y. K. Chan & Jennifer W. M. Lai & Namwoon Kim, 2022. "Strategic motives and performance implications of proactive versus reactive environmental strategies in corporate sustainable development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2127-2142, July.
    8. Nam Hoang Vu & Ngoc Minh Nguyen, 2022. "Development of small-and medium-sized enterprises through information technology adoption persistence in Vietnam," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 585-616, July.
    9. Mengying Feng & Wantao Yu & Xingyu Wang & Chee Yew Wong & Maozeng Xu & Zhi Xiao, 2018. "Green supply chain management and financial performance: The mediating roles of operational and environmental performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 811-824, November.
    10. Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Stefan Seuring & Ana Beatriz Lopes De Sousa Jabbour & Daniel Jugend & Paula de Camargo Fiorini & Hengky Latan & Wagner Colucci Izeppi, 2020. "Stakeholders, innovative business models for the circular economy and sustainable performance of firms in an emerging economy facing institutional voids," Post-Print hal-04275092, HAL.
    11. Anthony Jnr, Bokolo, 2020. "Examining the role of green IT/IS innovation in collaborative enterprise-implications in an emerging economy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    12. Damini Sundar & Kaliyan Mathiyazhagan & Vernika Agarwal & Mukund Janardhanan & Andrea Appolloni, 2023. "From linear to a circular economy in the e‐waste management sector: Experience from the transition barriers in the United Kingdom," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4282-4298, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmed Alyahya & Gomaa Agag, 2025. "Improving Corporate Environmental Performance Through Big Data Analytics Implementation: The Role of Industry Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Viktor Koval & I Wayan Edi Arsawan & Ni Putu Santi Suryantini & Serhii Kovbasenko & Nadiia Fisunenko & Tetiana Aloshyna, 2022. "Circular Economy and Sustainability-Oriented Innovation: Conceptual Framework and Energy Future Avenue," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Noor Ul Hadi, 2024. "Unveiling the Complex Relationship between Open Circular Innovation and Business Circularity: The Role of Circular-Based Dynamic Capabilities and Circular Ambidexterity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Jin Zhu & Fei Huang, 2023. "Transformational Leadership, Organizational Innovation, and ESG Performance: Evidence from SMEs in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Stekelorum, Rebecca & Laguir, Issam & Gupta, Shivam & Kumar, Sameer, 2021. "Green supply chain management practices and third-party logistics providers’ performances: A fuzzy-set approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    6. Chaudhuri, Ranjan & Chatterjee, Sheshadri & Gupta, Shivam & Kamble, Sachin, 2023. "Green supply chain technology and organization performance: Moderating role of environmental dynamism and product-service innovation capability," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    7. Mansour Alyahya & Gomaa Agag, 2025. "How Does Corporate Environmental Performance Contribute to Firm Performance and Customer Satisfaction? A Longitudinal Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-22, February.
    8. Sadiq, Muhammad & Nawaz, Muhammad Atif & Sharif, Arshian & Hanif, Sobia, 2024. "Bridging green supply chain practices and environmental performance in Chinese semiconductor sector: With the role of energy efficiency and green HRM," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    9. German Arana‐Landin & Waleska Sigüenza & Beñat Landeta‐Manzano & Iker Laskurain‐Iturbe, 2024. "Circular economy: On the road to ISO 59000 family of standards," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1977-2009, May.
    10. Kusa, Rafał & Suder, Marcin & Duda, Joanna, 2023. "Impact of greening on performance in the hospitality industry: Moderating effect of flexibility and inter-organizational cooperation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    11. Yousaf, Umair Bin & Ullah, Irfan & Jiang, Junchen & Wang, Man, 2022. "The role of board capital in driving green innovation: Evidence from China," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    12. Ana Labella-Fernández & M. Mar Serrano-Arcos & Belén Payán-Sánchez, 2021. "Firm Growth as a Driver of Sustainable Product Innovation: Mediation and Moderation Analysis. Evidence from Manufacturing Firms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Mateusz Wielopolski & Willem Bulthuis, 2023. "The Better Building Initiative — a Collaborative Ecosystem Involving All Stakeholders as Catalyst to Accelerate the Adoption of Circular Economy Innovations in the Construction Sector," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 719-733, June.
    14. Richard Yeaw Chong Seow, 2024. "Determinants of environmental, social, and governance disclosure: A systematic literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2314-2330, March.
    15. Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Maha Faisal Alsayegh, 2021. "Determinants of Corporate Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) Reporting among Asian Firms," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, April.
    16. Hossein Rahnama & Kerstin Johansen & Lisa Larsson & Anna Öhrwall Rönnbäck, 2022. "Collaboration in Value Constellations for Sustainable Production: The Perspective of Small Technology Solution Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    17. Mahmoona Khalil & Kausar Fiaz Khawaja & Muddassar Sarfraz, 2022. "The adoption of blockchain technology in the financial sector during the era of fourth industrial revolution: a moderated mediated model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2435-2452, August.
    18. Tan, Yafei & Zhu, Zhaohui, 2022. "The effect of ESG rating events on corporate green innovation in China: The mediating role of financial constraints and managers' environmental awareness," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    19. Hoyoung Lee, 2020. "The Role of Environmental Uncertainty, Green HRM and Green SCM in Influencing Organization s Energy Efficacy and Environmental Performance," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(3), pages 332-339.
    20. Dmitry A. Ruban & Natalia N. Yashalova, 2022. "Pro-environmental behavior prescribed by top companies of the world," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 7918-7935, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1848-:d:1596922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.