IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p1842-d1596805.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Approach to Municipal Transparency: Which Index Best Assesses Compliance in Spain?

Author

Listed:
  • Elisabeth Zafra-Gómez

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Lorena Márquez-Arenas

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • María Angustias Navarro-Ruiz

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Pablo Povedano-Fernández

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Jose Luis Zafra-Gómez

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

Abstract

Transparency in public entities has been an issue that has attracted great attention from academics in recent years, and on which there has been a significant regulatory effort, both internationally and in the national legislations of the different countries. Given the diversity of proposed transparency measurement indices for public entities in the previous literature, it could be understood that research in this field has so far not provided fully satisfactory results to measure, evaluate, and compare transparency practices in the entities. This would justify the need to continue investigating in this field, taking as a reference the active disclosure obligations set out in the legislation. The objective of this work focuses on the evaluation of the transparency of Spanish local authorities with a population of more than 175,000 inhabitants, using a Transparency Index constructed from the items included in the standardised programme of the Spanish Court of Audit, and its comparison with the results achieved using the Bidimensional Transparency Index (BTI). It can be concluded that different methodologies from various regulators lead to distinct evaluations, as demonstrated by the application of the Li test in this study. The main contribution of this paper is the proposal of an index that provides a summary measure of the level of compliance with all the aspects that the Court of Audit considers fundamental in relation to compliance with the LTAIBG with respect to the obligation of active publicity of local entities. This index would make it possible to complement with a “summary” score the content of the audit reports of the CoA, which would provide a clearer view of the level of compliance of local entities, as well as a comparison with other comparable entities in terms of size, thus favouring “competition” among them, which could lead to an improvement in the levels of compliance with the active disclosure obligations established in the law.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisabeth Zafra-Gómez & Lorena Márquez-Arenas & María Angustias Navarro-Ruiz & Pablo Povedano-Fernández & Jose Luis Zafra-Gómez, 2025. "Comparative Approach to Municipal Transparency: Which Index Best Assesses Compliance in Spain?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-25, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1842-:d:1596805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1842/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1842/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leopold Simar & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2006. "On Testing Equality of Distributions of Technical Efficiency Scores," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 497-522.
    2. Alan K. Styles & Mack Tennyson, 2007. "The accessibility of financial reporting of u.s. municipalities on the internet," Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(1), pages 56-92, March.
    3. Pablo Archel & Javier Husillos & Carlos Larrinaga & Crawford Spence, 2009. "Social disclosure, legitimacy theory and the role of the state," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(8), pages 1284-1307, October.
    4. Berkel, Hanna & Estmann, Christian & Rand, John, 2022. "Local governance quality and law compliance: The case of Mozambican firms," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. Richard P. Rumelt & Dan Schendel & David J. Teece, 1991. "Strategic management and economics," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(S2), pages 5-29, December.
    6. José Manuel Pastor & Emili Tortosa‐Ausina, 2008. "Social Capital And Bank Performance: An International Comparison For Oecd Countries," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 76(2), pages 223-265, March.
    7. Nuno F. da Cruz & Rui Cunha Marques, 2017. "Structuring composite local governance indicators," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 109-129, March.
    8. Belinda Williams & Trevor Wilmshurst & Robert Clift, 2011. "Sustainability reporting by local government in Australia: Current and future prospects," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 176-186, September.
    9. Williams, Belinda & Wilmshurst, Trevor & Clift, Robert, 2011. "Sustainability reporting by local government in Australia: Current and future prospects," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 176-186.
    10. Sičáková-Beblavá Emília & Kollárik Martin & Sloboda Matúš, 2016. "Exploring the Determinants of Transparency of Slovak Municipalities," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 121-145, December.
    11. Nuno Ferreira da Cruz & António F. Tavares & Rui Cunha Marques & Susana Jorge & Luís de Sousa, 2016. "Measuring Local Government Transparency," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 866-893, July.
    12. Giulio Greco & Nick Sciulli & Giuseppe D'Onza, 2015. "The Influence of Stakeholder Engagement on Sustainability Reporting: Evidence from Italian local councils," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 465-488, April.
    13. Zaitul Zaitul & Desi Ilona & Neva Novianti, 2023. "Good Governance in Rural Local Administration," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francisco J. Alcaraz-Quiles & Andrés Navarro-Galera & David Ortiz-Rodríguez, 2020. "The contribution of the right to information laws in Europe to local government transparency on sustainability," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 161-178, March.
    2. Davide Giacomini & Laura Rocca & Cristian Carini & Mario Mazzoleni, 2018. "Overcoming the Barriers to the Diffusion of Sustainability Reporting in Italian LGOs: Better Stick or Carrot?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Jan Alpenberg & Tomasz Wnuk-Pel & Amanda Henebäck, 2018. "Environmental Orientation in Swedish Local Governments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Davide Giacomini & Paola Zola & Diego Paredi & Mario Mazzoleni, 2020. "Environmental disclosure and stakeholder engagement via social media: State of the art and potential in public utilities," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1552-1564, July.
    5. Mădălina Dumitru & Justyna Dyduch & Raluca-Gina Gușe & Joanna Krasodomska, 2017. "Corporate Reporting Practices in Poland and Romania – An Ex-ante Study to the New Non-financial Reporting European Directive," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 279-304, September.
    6. Enrico Bracci & Mouhcine Tallaki, 2013. "Socio-environmental reporting trends in the Italian local government: Thrive or wither?," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(2), pages 27-46.
    7. Anca Gabriela Petrescu & Florentina Raluca Bîlcan & Marius Petrescu & Ionica Holban Oncioiu & Mirela Cătălina Türkeș & Sorinel Căpuşneanu, 2020. "Assessing the Benefits of the Sustainability Reporting Practices in the Top Romanian Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-31, April.
    8. Isabel Narbón-Perpiñá & Maria Balaguer-Coll & Emili Tortosa-Ausina, 2019. "Evaluating local government performance in times of crisis," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 64-100, January.
    9. Cristina M. Campos-Alba & Emilio J. De la Higuera-Molina & Gemma Pérez-López & José L. Zafra-Gómez, 2019. "Measuring the Efficiency of Public and Private Delivery Forms: An Application to the Waste Collection Service Using Order-M Data Panel Frontier Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, April.
    10. Vera Coutinho & Ana Rita Domingues & Sandra Caeiro & Marco Painho & Paula Antunes & Rui Santos & Nuno Videira & Richard M. Walker & Donald Huisingh & Tomás B. Ramos, 2018. "Employee‐Driven Sustainability Performance Assessment in Public Organisations," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1), pages 29-46, January.
    11. Tamara Guerrero-Gómez & Andrés Navarro-Galera & David Ortiz-Rodríguez, 2021. "Promoting Online Transparency to Help Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals: An Empirical Study of Local Governments in Latin America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    12. Marc Aliana & Diego Prior & Emili Tortosa-Ausina, 2025. "Environmental factors in cross-country productivity growth: A conditional Malmquist Index," Working Papers 2025/01, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain).
    13. Ohene-Asare, Kwaku & Turkson, Charles & Afful-Dadzie, Anthony, 2017. "Multinational operation, ownership and efficiency differences in the international oil industry," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 303-312.
    14. Cregård Anna & Sobis Iwona, 2017. "Dissemination of Environmental Information and its Effects on Stakeholders’ Decision-Making: A Comparative Study between Swedish and Polish Municipalities," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 10(2), pages 9-47, December.
    15. Juan Piedra-Peña & Diego Prior, 2023. "Analyzing the effect of health reforms on the efficiency of Ecuadorian public hospitals," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 361-392, September.
    16. Andrés Navarro-Galera & Mercedes Ruiz-Lozano & Pilar Tirado-Valencia & Araceli de los Ríos-Berjillos, 2017. "Promoting Sustainability Transparency in European Local Governments: An Empirical Analysis Based on Administrative Cultures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-20, March.
    17. Chen, Ya & Pan, Yongbin & Liu, Haoxiang & Wu, Huaqing & Deng, Guangwei, 2023. "Efficiency analysis of Chinese universities with shared inputs: An aggregated two-stage network DEA approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    18. Sofie Balcaen & Sophie Manigart & Hubert Ooghe, 2011. "From distress to exit: determinants of the time to exit," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 407-446, August.
    19. Requillart, Vincent & Nauges, Celine & Simioni, Michel & Bontemps, Christophe, 2012. "Food Safety Regulation and Firm Productivity: Evidence from the French Food Industry," 2012 First Congress, June 4-5, 2012, Trento, Italy 124378, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    20. Peter E. Harland & Zakir Uddin & Sven Laudien, 2020. "Product platforms as a lever of competitive advantage on a company-wide level: a resource management perspective," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 137-158, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1842-:d:1596805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.