IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1658-d1592874.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coal Mines and Multi-Faceted Risks in the United States: On a Path Toward a Sustainable Future or Emptying Out?

Author

Listed:
  • Michael R. Greenberg

    (Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA)

  • Dona Schneider

    (Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA)

Abstract

Coal is a major source of fuel in many countries, but its mining and use increase the impacts on human and environmental health. Given the wide variation in coal use by nation, we focused on one—the United States. Specifically, we examined the public health, community, and demographic characteristics of 130 U.S. counties with underground and/or surface coal mines that exemplify a land use that leads to a combination of natural and anthropogenic risks. We compared these 130 to other U.S. counties, finding that the coal counties had poorer health outcomes and behaviors, fewer community assets, lower socioeconomic status, and higher population losses compared to the remaining counties in their host states and other U.S. counties. Next, we looked for differences within the 130 coal counties. Counties with the most coal mines and production had the worst outcomes, especially when located in rural areas. We then examined federal programs to assist these coal communities, observing that the largest federal government programs appear to be sending more resources to the most distressed coal counties compared to the less distressed ones. The daunting challenge for the most heavily coal-dependent counties, their state governments, and federal government supporters is to jointly develop plans that are realistic and affordable, take advantage of local natural and human resources, and offer a path to sustainable existence. If the efforts do not succeed, these places run the risk of becoming politically invisible and their populations are likely to empty out.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael R. Greenberg & Dona Schneider, 2025. "Coal Mines and Multi-Faceted Risks in the United States: On a Path Toward a Sustainable Future or Emptying Out?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-20, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1658-:d:1592874
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1658/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1658/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Squalli, Jay, 2017. "Renewable energy, coal as a baseload power source, and greenhouse gas emissions: Evidence from U.S. state-level data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 479-488.
    2. Yuan, Jiahai & Lei, Qi & Xiong, Minpeng & Guo, Jingsheng & Hu, Zheng, 2016. "The prospective of coal power in China: Will it reach a plateau in the coming decade?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 495-504.
    3. Peter Roberts, 2006. "Evaluating regional sustainable development: Approaches, methods and the politics of analysis," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 515-532.
    4. Sanya Carley & Tom P. Evans & Michelle Graff & David M. Konisky, 2018. "A framework for evaluating geographic disparities in energy transition vulnerability," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 3(8), pages 621-627, August.
    5. Zhao, Stephen & Alexandroff, Alan, 2019. "Current and future struggles to eliminate coal," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 511-520.
    6. Haggerty, Julia H. & Haggerty, Mark N. & Roemer, Kelli & Rose, Jackson, 2018. "Planning for the local impacts of coal facility closure: Emerging strategies in the U.S. West," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 69-80.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anggi Putri Kurniadi & Hasdi Aimon & Zamroni Salim & Ragimun Ragimun & Adang Sonjaya & Sigit Setiawan & Viktor Siagian & Lokot Zein Nasution & R Nurhidajat & Mutaqin Mutaqin & Joko Sabtohadi, 2024. "Analysis of Existing and Forecasting for Coal and Solar Energy Consumption on Climate Change in Asia Pacific: New Evidence for Sustainable Development Goals," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(4), pages 352-359, July.
    2. Helmke-Long, Laura & Carley, Sanya & Konisky, David M., 2022. "Municipal government adaptive capacity programs for vulnerable populations during the U.S. energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    3. Raimi, Daniel, 2021. "Mapping County-Level Exposure and Vulnerability to the US Energy Transition," RFF Working Paper Series 21-36, Resources for the Future.
    4. Dong, Kangyin & Sun, Renjin & Li, Hui & Liao, Hua, 2018. "Does natural gas consumption mitigate CO2 emissions: Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for 14 Asia-Pacific countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 419-429.
    5. Fan, Jinyang & Liu, Wei & Jiang, Deyi & Chen, Junchao & Ngaha Tiedeu, William & Chen, Jie & JJK, Deaman, 2018. "Thermodynamic and applicability analysis of a hybrid CAES system using abandoned coal mine in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 31-44.
    6. Wang, Zhibao & Zhao, Nana & Wei, Wendong & Zhang, Qianwen, 2021. "A differentiated energy Kuznets curve: Evidence from mainland China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    7. Jie Gao & Qingmei Tan & Bo Cui, 2024. "Reducing Carbon Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants: An Analysis Using Evolutionary Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Mark Howells & Brent Boehlert & Pablo César Benitez, 2021. "Potential Climate Change Risks to Meeting Zimbabwe’s NDC Goals and How to Become Resilient," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-26, September.
    9. Ploy Achakulwisut & Peter Erickson & Céline Guivarch & Roberto Schaeffer & Elina Brutschin & Steve Pye, 2023. "Global fossil fuel reduction pathways under different climate mitigation strategies and ambitions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Zhao, Changhong & Zhang, Weirong & Wang, Yang & Liu, Qilin & Guo, Jingsheng & Xiong, Minpeng & Yuan, Jiahai, 2017. "The economics of coal power generation in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 1-9.
    11. Sarah Mittlefehldt & Erin Bunting & Emily Huff & Joseph Welsh & Robert Goodwin, 2021. "New Methods for Assessing Sustainability of Wood-Burning Energy Facilities: Combining Historical and Spatial Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    12. Liu, Lan-Cui & Cheng, Lei & Zhao, Lu-Tao & Cao, Ying & Wang, Ce, 2020. "Investigating the significant variation of coal consumption in China in 2002-2017," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    13. Zhang, Yali & Li, Wenqi & Wu, Feng, 2020. "Does energy transition improve air quality? Evidence derived from China’s Winter Clean Heating Pilot (WCHP) project," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    14. Peterson K. Ozili & Paul Terhemba Iorember, 2024. "Financial stability and sustainable development," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(3), pages 2620-2646, July.
    15. Yuan, Jiahai & Wang, Yang & Zhang, Weirong & Zhao, Changhong & Liu, Qian & Shen, Xinyi & Zhang, Kai & Dong, Liansai, 2017. "Will recent boom in coal power lead to a bust in China? A micro-economic analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 645-656.
    16. Müller-Hansen, Finn & Lee, Yuan Ting & Callaghan, Max & Jankin, Slava & Minx, Jan C., 2022. "The German coal debate on Twitter: Reactions to a corporate policy process," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    17. Kangyin Dong & Xiucheng Dong & Qingzhe Jiang, 2020. "How renewable energy consumption lower global CO2 emissions? Evidence from countries with different income levels," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(6), pages 1665-1698, June.
    18. Oei, Pao-Yu & Hermann, Hauke & Herpich, Philipp & Holtemöller, Oliver & Lünenbürger, Benjamin & Schult, Christoph, 2020. "Coal phase-out in Germany – Implications and policies for affected regions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    19. Minpeng Xiong & Xiaowen Yang & Sisi Chen & Fulian Shi & Jiahai Yuan, 2019. "Environmental Stress Testing for China’s Overseas Coal Power Investment Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-27, October.
    20. Mahendra Kumar Singh & Deep Mukherjee, 2019. "Drivers of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States: revisiting STIRPAT model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 3015-3031, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1658-:d:1592874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.