IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1636-d1592349.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Driving Effects and Differences of Transportation Carbon Emissions in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

Author

Listed:
  • Haichang Guan

    (School of Economics and Management, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
    School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
    European Studies Center of Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China)

  • Chengfeng Huang

    (School of Economics and Management, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China)

Abstract

Identifying the driving effects and differentiated characteristics of transportation carbon emissions is crucial for developing targeted and differentiated emission reduction strategies and providing a scientific basis for the Yangtze River Economic Belt. This study adopted a “top-down” approach to account for the transportation carbon emissions of the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2000 to 2019 and constructed LMDI models and quantile regression models to estimate the driving effects and heterogeneity of influencing factors. The research results indicate the following: (1) The level of economic development is a key driving factor for transportation carbon emissions in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, with a cumulative effect of 160%. Upon inspection, the relationship between economic and transportation carbon emissions conforms to the environmental Kuznets curve. When the per capita transportation production value reaches CNY 7500, there is a “turning point” in transportation carbon emissions. (2) The population size has a driving effect on transportation carbon emissions, but as carbon emissions continue to increase, their marginal effects gradually diminish. (3) The energy structure and transportation structure have a significant inhibitory effect on transportation carbon emissions. The driving effect of the energy structure shows an “N” shape with quantile changes, while the transportation structure gradually converges. (4) Both energy intensity and transportation intensity show inhibitory effects, indicating that innovative energy substitution, optimization of transportation structure, and improvement of organizational efficiency are key ways to achieve carbon reduction in transportation. It is suggested that the Yangtze River Economic Belt should develop differentiated emission reduction paths in different regions, effectively balance economic development and carbon emission control, and promote the green and low-carbon transformation of the transportation system.

Suggested Citation

  • Haichang Guan & Chengfeng Huang, 2025. "Driving Effects and Differences of Transportation Carbon Emissions in the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1636-:d:1592349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1636/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1636/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timilsina, Govinda R. & Shrestha, Ashish, 2009. "Transport sector CO2 emissions growth in Asia: Underlying factors and policy options," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 4523-4539, November.
    2. Ang, B. W., 2005. "The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: a practical guide," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 867-871, May.
    3. Koenker, Roger W & Bassett, Gilbert, Jr, 1978. "Regression Quantiles," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 33-50, January.
    4. Lu, I.J. & Lin, Sue J. & Lewis, Charles, 2007. "Decomposition and decoupling effects of carbon dioxide emission from highway transportation in Taiwan, Germany, Japan and South Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 3226-3235, June.
    5. Timilsina, Govinda R. & Shrestha, Ashish, 2009. "Why have CO2 emissions increased in the transport sector in Asia ? underlying factors and policy options," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5098, The World Bank.
    6. Mazzarino, Marco, 2000. "The economics of the greenhouse effect: evaluating the climate change impact due to the transport sector in Italy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(13), pages 957-966, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jing Zhou & Chao Chen & Zhengxing He & Jiaming Tang, 2025. "Carbon Emissions and Economic Growth in the Planting Industry: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-27, March.
    2. Changyuan Li & Xin Yang & Hong Wei & Zheneng Hu & Zhuoya Zhang, 2025. "Research on the Influencing Factors of College Students’ Willingness-to-Pay for Carbon Offsets in the Context of Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manel Daldoul & Ahlem Dakhlaoui, 2018. "Using the LMDI Decomposition Approach to Analyze the Influencing Factors of Carbon Emissions in Tunisian Transportation Sector," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(6), pages 22-28.
    2. Suyi Kim, 2019. "Decomposition Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Korea’s Transportation Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Xiaoshu Cao & Shishu OuYang & Dan Liu & Wenyue Yang, 2019. "Spatiotemporal Patterns and Decomposition Analysis of CO 2 Emissions from Transportation in the Pearl River Delta," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Geoffrey Udoka Nnadiri & Anthony S. F. Chiu & Jose Bienvenido Manuel Biona & Neil Stephen Lopez, 2021. "Comparison of Driving Forces to Increasing Traffic Flow and Transport Emissions in Philippine Regions: A Spatial Decomposition Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Sobrino, Natalia & Monzon, Andres, 2014. "The impact of the economic crisis and policy actions on GHG emissions from road transport in Spain," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 486-498.
    6. Lilis Yuaningsih & R. Adjeng Mariana Febrianti & Munawar Javed Ahmad, 2021. "Examining the Factors Affecting CO2 Emissions from Road Transportation in Malaysia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(6), pages 152-159.
    7. GUPTA Monika & SINGH Sanjay, 2016. "Factorizing The Changes In Co2 Emissions From Indian Road Passenger Transport: A Decomposition Analysis," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 11(3), pages 67-83, December.
    8. Zhao Liu & Ling Li & Yue-Jun Zhang, 2015. "Investigating the CO 2 emission differences among China’s transport sectors and their influencing factors," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 77(2), pages 1323-1343, June.
    9. Shiraki, Hiroto & Matsumoto, Ken'ichi & Shigetomi, Yosuke & Ehara, Tomoki & Ochi, Yuki & Ogawa, Yuki, 2020. "Factors affecting CO2 emissions from private automobiles in Japan: The impact of vehicle occupancy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    10. González, Rosa Marina & Marrero, Gustavo A. & Rodríguez-López, Jesús & Marrero, Ángel S., 2019. "Analyzing CO2 emissions from passenger cars in Europe: A dynamic panel data approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1271-1281.
    11. Wang, W.W. & Zhang, M. & Zhou, M., 2011. "Using LMDI method to analyze transport sector CO2 emissions in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 5909-5915.
    12. M'raihi, Rafaa & Mraihi, Talel & Harizi, Riadh & Taoufik Bouzidi, Mohamed, 2015. "Carbon emissions growth and road freight: Analysis of the influencing factors in Tunisia," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 121-129.
    13. Yang Song & Kevin R. Gurney, 2020. "The Relationship between On-Road FFCO 2 Emissions and Socio-Economic/Urban Form Factors for Global Cities: Significance, Robustness and Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-24, July.
    14. Xue-Ting Jiang & Jie-Fang Dong & Xing-Min Wang & Rong-Rong Li, 2016. "The Multilevel Index Decomposition of Energy-Related Carbon Emission and Its Decoupling with Economic Growth in USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Zhang, Ming & Li, Huanan & Zhou, Min & Mu, Hailin, 2011. "Decomposition analysis of energy consumption in Chinese transportation sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(6), pages 2279-2285, June.
    16. Liu Yang & Yuanqing Wang & Yujun Lian & Xin Dong & Jianhong Liu & Yuanyuan Liu & Zhouhao Wu, 2023. "Rational planning strategies of urban structure, metro, and car use for reducing transport carbon dioxide emissions in developing cities," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 6987-7010, July.
    17. Jaewon Lim & DooHwan Won, 2019. "Impact of CARB’s Tailpipe Emission Standard Policy on CO 2 Reduction among the U.S. States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, February.
    18. Luo, Xiao & Dong, Liang & Dou, Yi & Liang, Hanwei & Ren, Jingzheng & Fang, Kai, 2016. "Regional disparity analysis of Chinese freight transport CO2 emissions from 1990 to 2007: Driving forces and policy challenges," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1-14.
    19. Yi Liang & Dongxiao Niu & Haichao Wang & Yan Li, 2017. "Factors Affecting Transportation Sector CO 2 Emissions Growth in China: An LMDI Decomposition Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-20, September.
    20. Song, Yan & Zhang, Ming & Shan, Cheng, 2019. "Research on the decoupling trend and mitigation potential of CO2 emissions from China's transport sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 837-843.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1636-:d:1592349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.