IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i10p1730-d113553.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Affecting Transportation Sector CO 2 Emissions Growth in China: An LMDI Decomposition Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Liang

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Dongxiao Niu

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Haichao Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Yan Li

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

Abstract

China has now become the largest country in carbon emissions all over the world. Furthermore, with transportation accounting for an increasing proportion of CO 2 emissions year by year, the transportation sector has turned out to be one of the main sectors which possesses a high growth speed in CO 2 emissions. To accurately analyze potentially influencing factors which accelerate the process of CO 2 emissions of transportation sector in China, based on carbon accounting by the checklists method of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC), in this paper, we propose a decomposition model using Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) decomposition analysis technology and modified fixed growth rate method. Then effects of six influencing factors including energy structure, energy efficiency, transport form, transportation development, economic development and population size from 2001 to 2014 were quantitatively analyzed. Consequently, the results indicate that: (1) economic development accounts most for driving CO 2 emissions growth of the transportation sector, while energy efficiency accounts most for suppressing CO 2 emissions growth; (2) the pulling effects of natural gas, electricity and other clean energy consumption on CO 2 emissions growth offset the inhibitory effects of traditional fossil fuels, making energy structure play a significant role in promoting CO 2 emissions growth; (3) the inhibitory effects of railways and highways lead to inhibitory effects of transport form on CO 2 emissions growth; (4) transportation development plays an obvious role in promoting CO 2 emissions, while the effects of population size is relatively weaker compared with those of transportation development. Furthermore, the decomposition model of CO 2 emissions factors in transport industry constructed in this paper can also be applied to other countries so as to provide guidance and reference for CO 2 emissions analysis of transportation industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Liang & Dongxiao Niu & Haichao Wang & Yan Li, 2017. "Factors Affecting Transportation Sector CO 2 Emissions Growth in China: An LMDI Decomposition Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:10:p:1730-:d:113553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1730/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1730/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ang, B. W., 2004. "Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy:: which is the preferred method?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1131-1139, June.
    2. Liu, Na & Ang, B.W., 2007. "Factors shaping aggregate energy intensity trend for industry: Energy intensity versus product mix," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 609-635, July.
    3. Su, Bin & Ang, B.W. & Li, Yingzhu, 2017. "Input-output and structural decomposition analysis of Singapore's carbon emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 484-492.
    4. Henriques, Sofia Teives & Borowiecki, Karol J., 2017. "The drivers of long-run CO2 emissions in Europe, North America and Japan since 1800," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 537-549.
    5. Timilsina, Govinda R. & Shrestha, Ashish, 2009. "Transport sector CO2 emissions growth in Asia: Underlying factors and policy options," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 4523-4539, November.
    6. Wang, Miao & Feng, Chao, 2017. "Decomposition of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: An empirical analysis based on provincial panel data of three sectors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 772-787.
    7. X. Q. Liu & B. W. Ang & H.L. Ong, 1992. "The Application of the Divisia Index to the Decomposition of Changes in Industrial Energy Consumption," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 4), pages 161-178.
    8. Ang, B. W., 2005. "The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: a practical guide," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 867-871, May.
    9. G. Boyd & J. F. McDonald & M. Ross & D. A. Hansont, 1987. "Separating the Changing Composition of U.S. Manufacturing Production from Energy Efficiency Improvements: A Divisia Index Approach," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2), pages 77-96.
    10. Ang, B.W. & Liu, Na, 2007. "Negative-value problems of the logarithmic mean Divisia index decomposition approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 739-742, January.
    11. Timilsina, Govinda R. & Shrestha, Ashish, 2009. "Why have CO2 emissions increased in the transport sector in Asia ? underlying factors and policy options," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5098, The World Bank.
    12. Ang, B.W. & Liu, Na, 2007. "Handling zero values in the logarithmic mean Divisia index decomposition approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 238-246, January.
    13. Yuhuan Zhao & Hao Li & Zhonghua Zhang & Yongfeng Zhang & Song Wang & Ya Liu, 2017. "Decomposition and scenario analysis of CO2 emissions in China’s power industry: based on LMDI method," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 86(2), pages 645-668, March.
    14. Boyd, Gale A. & Hanson, Donald A. & Sterner, Thomas, 1988. "Decomposition of changes in energy intensity : A comparison of the Divisia index and other methods," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 309-312, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaoqin Chen & Shenya Mao & Siqi Lv & Zhong Fang, 2022. "A Study on the Non-Linear Impact of Digital Technology Innovation on Carbon Emissions in the Transportation Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Sheng-Wen Tseng, 2019. "Analysis of Energy-Related Carbon Emissions in Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Yali Zheng & Xiaoyi He & Hewu Wang & Michael Wang & Shaojun Zhang & Dong Ma & Binggang Wang & Ye Wu, 2020. "Well-to-wheels greenhouse gas and air pollutant emissions from battery electric vehicles in China," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 355-370, March.
    4. Ming Meng & Manyu Li, 2020. "Decomposition Analysis and Trend Prediction of CO 2 Emissions in China’s Transportation Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Jan Kunkler & Maximilian Braun & Florian Kellner, 2021. "Speed Limit Induced CO 2 Reduction on Motorways: Enhancing Discussion Transparency through Data Enrichment of Road Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, January.
    6. Ağbulut, Ümit & Sarıdemir, Suat, 2024. "Synergistic effects of hybrid nanoparticles along with conventional fuel on engine performance, combustion, and environmental characteristics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    7. Jianghua Liu & Mengxu Li & Yitao Ding, 2021. "Econometric analysis of the impact of the urban population size on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 18186-18203, December.
    8. Fernando Ramos-Quintana & Héctor Sotelo-Nava & Hugo Saldarriaga-Noreña & Efraín Tovar-Sánchez, 2019. "Assessing the Environmental Quality Resulting from Damages to Human-Nature Interactions Caused by Population Increase: A Systems Thinking Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-29, April.
    9. Edvard Tijan & Adrijana Agatić & Marija Jović & Saša Aksentijević, 2019. "Maritime National Single Window—A Prerequisite for Sustainable Seaport Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Manel Daldoul & Ahlem Dakhlaoui, 2018. "Using the LMDI Decomposition Approach to Analyze the Influencing Factors of Carbon Emissions in Tunisian Transportation Sector," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(6), pages 22-28.
    11. Fontaine Dubois Bissai & Bienvenu Gael Fouda Mbanga & Cyrille Adiang Mezoue & Séverin Nguiya, 2023. "An Analysis of the Driving Factors Related to Energy Consumption in the Road Transport Sector of the City of Douala, Cameroon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Chen, Jiandong & Xu, Chong & Cui, Lianbiao & Huang, Shuo & Song, Malin, 2019. "Driving factors of CO2 emissions and inequality characteristics in China: A combined decomposition approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 589-597.
    13. Yu, Yang & Li, Shuangqi & Sun, Huaping & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2021. "Energy carbon emission reduction of China’s transportation sector: An input–output approach," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 378-393.
    14. Suyi Kim, 2019. "Decomposition Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Korea’s Transportation Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, April.
    15. Changzheng Zhu & Dawei Gao, 2019. "A Research on the Factors Influencing Carbon Emission of Transportation Industry in “the Belt and Road Initiative” Countries Based on Panel Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, June.
    16. Fernando Ramos-Quintana & Efraín Tovar-Sánchez & Hugo Saldarriaga-Noreña & Héctor Sotelo-Nava & Juan Paulo Sánchez-Hernández & María-Luisa Castrejón-Godínez, 2019. "A CBR–AHP Hybrid Method to Support the Decision-Making Process in the Selection of Environmental Management Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-30, October.
    17. Anwar, Ahsan & Sharif, Arshian & Fatima, Saba & Ahmad, Paiman & Sinha, Avik & Khan, Syed Abdul Rehman & Jermsittiparsert, Kittisak, 2021. "The asymmetric effect of public private partnership investment on transport CO2 emission in China: Evidence from quantile ARDL approach," MPRA Paper 108160, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2021.
    18. Dražen Žgaljić & Edvard Tijan & Alen Jugović & Tanja Poletan Jugović, 2019. "Implementation of Sustainable Motorways of the Sea Services Multi-Criteria Analysis of a Croatian Port System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-21, December.
    19. Saeed Solaymani & Saeed Sharafi, 2021. "A Comparative Study between Government Support and Energy Efficiency in Malaysian Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, May.
    20. Xiaodong Li & Ai Ren & Qi Li, 2022. "Exploring Patterns of Transportation-Related CO 2 Emissions Using Machine Learning Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.
    21. Adekunle, Wasiu & Omo-Ikirodah, Beatrice & Collins, Olutosin & Adeniyi, Andrew & Bagudo, Abubakar & Mosobalaje, Risikat & Oladepo, Safiyyah, 2021. "Analysis of Environmental Degradation and its Determinants in Nigeria: New Evidence from ARDL and Causality Approaches," MPRA Paper 111069, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 14 Dec 2021.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, H. & Ang, B.W. & Su, Bin, 2017. "Assessing drivers of economy-wide energy use and emissions: IDA versus SDA," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 585-599.
    2. Md. Afzal Hossain & Jean Engo & Songsheng Chen, 2021. "The main factors behind Cameroon’s CO2 emissions before, during and after the economic crisis of the 1980s," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 4500-4520, March.
    3. Cansino, José M. & Sánchez-Braza, Antonio & Rodríguez-Arévalo, María L., 2015. "Driving forces of Spain׳s CO2 emissions: A LMDI decomposition approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 749-759.
    4. González, Domingo & Martínez, Manuel, 2012. "Changes in CO2 emission intensities in the Mexican industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 149-163.
    5. Seck, Gondia Sokhna & Guerassimoff, Gilles & Maïzi, Nadia, 2016. "Analysis of the importance of structural change in non-energy intensive industry for prospective modelling: The French case," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 114-124.
    6. Fernández González, P. & Landajo, M. & Presno, M.J., 2014. "Tracking European Union CO2 emissions through LMDI (logarithmic-mean Divisia index) decomposition. The activity revaluation approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 741-750.
    7. Liu, Na & Ang, B.W., 2007. "Factors shaping aggregate energy intensity trend for industry: Energy intensity versus product mix," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 609-635, July.
    8. Vaninsky, Alexander, 2014. "Factorial decomposition of CO2 emissions: A generalized Divisia index approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 389-400.
    9. Ang, B.W. & Huang, H.C. & Mu, A.R., 2009. "Properties and linkages of some index decomposition analysis methods," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 4624-4632, November.
    10. Lima, Fátima & Nunes, Manuel Lopes & Cunha, Jorge & Lucena, André F.P., 2016. "A cross-country assessment of energy-related CO2 emissions: An extended Kaya Index Decomposition Approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P2), pages 1361-1374.
    11. Liu, Xianmei & Peng, Rui & Zhong, Chao & Wang, Mingyue & Guo, Pibin, 2021. "What drives the temporal and spatial differences of CO2 emissions in the transport sector? Empirical evidence from municipalities in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    12. Patiño, Lourdes Isabel & Alcántara, Vicent & Padilla, Emilio, 2021. "Driving forces of CO2 emissions and energy intensity in Colombia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    13. Duran, Elisa & Aravena, Claudia & Aguilar, Renato, 2015. "Analysis and decomposition of energy consumption in the Chilean industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 552-561.
    14. Yang, Guangfei & Li, Wenli & Wang, Jianliang & Zhang, Dongqing, 2016. "A comparative study on the influential factors of China's provincial energy intensity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 74-85.
    15. Ren, Shenggang & Fu, Xiang & Chen, XiaoHong, 2012. "Regional variation of energy-related industrial CO2 emissions mitigation in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 1134-1145.
    16. Fernández González, P. & Landajo, M. & Presno, M.J., 2013. "The Divisia real energy intensity indices: Evolution and attribution of percent changes in 20 European countries from 1995 to 2010," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 340-349.
    17. Marcucci, Adriana & Fragkos, Panagiotis, 2015. "Drivers of regional decarbonization through 2100: A multi-model decomposition analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 111-124.
    18. Lin, Boqiang & Du, Kerui, 2014. "Decomposing energy intensity change: A combination of index decomposition analysis and production-theoretical decomposition analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 158-165.
    19. Ang, B.W. & Goh, Tian, 2019. "Index decomposition analysis for comparing emission scenarios: Applications and challenges," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 74-87.
    20. Shiraki, Hiroto & Matsumoto, Ken'ichi & Shigetomi, Yosuke & Ehara, Tomoki & Ochi, Yuki & Ogawa, Yuki, 2020. "Factors affecting CO2 emissions from private automobiles in Japan: The impact of vehicle occupancy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:10:p:1730-:d:113553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.