IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1546-d1590402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the Influence of the Ecological Environment on the Subjective Well-Being of Farmers Around Nature Reserves: Mediating Effects Based on Environmental Cognition

Author

Listed:
  • Ke Chen

    (College of Economic and Management, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110086, China)

  • Boyang Cao

    (College of Economic and Management, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110086, China)

  • Xinning Pan

    (College of Economic and Management, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110086, China)

  • Yang Wang

    (College of Economic and Management, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110086, China)

  • Dan He

    (College of Economic and Management, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110086, China)

Abstract

Improving the subjective well-being of farmers is the goal of rural revitalization. Based on the data from a survey of 956 farmers from 44 villages in six nature reserves in Liaoning province and the least squares regression model, this paper studies the impact of ecological environment quality on the subjective well-being of farmers around nature reserves and analyzes the mediating role of environmental cognition in the impact of ecological environment quality on the well-being of farmers around nature reserves. The results show that in terms of ecological environment quality, both the natural environment and the social environment have a significant positive impact on the subjective well-being of farmers around nature reserves. For every 1% improvement in the following aspects, the subjective well-being of rural households increases as follows: air quality: 25%, soil and vegetation conditions: 46%, wildlife population: 27%, medical service facilities: 23%, basic living facilities: 30%, environmental beautification facilities: 33%. Environmental cognition plays a mediating role between ecological environment quality and farmers’ subjective well-being. The influence of the natural environment and social environment on the subjective well-being of farmers outside nature reserves is higher than that inside nature reserves. This paper enriches the research on subjective well-being to a certain extent, analyzes the mechanism of the ecological environment’s influence on farmers’ subjective well-being, and provides theoretical reference for further improving farmers’ subjective well-being and promoting ecological civilization construction.

Suggested Citation

  • Ke Chen & Boyang Cao & Xinning Pan & Yang Wang & Dan He, 2025. "Study on the Influence of the Ecological Environment on the Subjective Well-Being of Farmers Around Nature Reserves: Mediating Effects Based on Environmental Cognition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1546-:d:1590402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1546/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1546/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Salauddin Tauseef, 2022. "Can Money Buy Happiness? Subjective Wellbeing and Its Relationship with Income, Relative Income, Monetary and Non-monetary Poverty in Bangladesh," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1073-1098, March.
    2. Hulin Pan, 2023. "Effect of the ecological environment on the residents’ happiness: the mechanism and an evidence from Zhejiang Province of China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 2716-2734, March.
    3. Jingjing Wang & Decai Tang, 2023. "Air Pollution, Environmental Protection Tax and Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Yu Liu & Ke Zhu & Rong-Lin Li & Yang Song & Zhi-Jiang Zhang, 2021. "Air Pollution Impairs Subjective Happiness by Damaging Their Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-9, September.
    5. Min Jee Nikki Han & Mi Jeong Kim, 2019. "Green Environments and Happiness Level in Housing Areas toward a Sustainable Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Kaiyu Hua & Xinsheng Pang, 2024. "Investigation into the Factors Affecting the Green Consumption Behavior of China Rural Residents in the Context of Dual Carbon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-24, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qianqian Liu & Guanpeng Dong & Wenzhong Zhang & Jiaming Li, 2022. "The Influence of Air Pollution on Happiness and Willingness to Pay for Clean Air in the Bohai Rim Area of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Mostafa E. Shahen & Shibly Shahrier & Koji Kotani, 2019. "Happiness, Generativity and Social Preferences in a Developing Country: A Possibility of Future Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Dongliang Yang & Xiangheng Liu & Zhichao Ren & Mingna Li, 2022. "Relation between Noise Pollution and Life Satisfaction Based on the 2019 Chinese Social Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-13, June.
    4. Jie Zhu & Chuntian Lu & Anrui Song, 2023. "Air Pollution Governance and Residents’ Happiness: Evidence of Blue Sky Defense in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Jingjing Wang & Decai Tang & Li Shang & David D. Lansana, 2024. "Impact of air pollution perception on environmental governance satisfaction," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Vlad Gabriel Cârstea & Ana Maria Mihaela Iordache & Alexandru Ionescu & Nela Ramona Grigore & Cristina Coculescu, 2024. "Enhancing Well-Being at Population Level: A Case Study on Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-26, November.
    7. Li, Junpeng & Ma, Wanglin & Gong, Binlei, 2023. "Market participation and subjective well-being of maize farmers," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 941-960.
    8. Behera, Deepak Kumar & Rahut, Dil B & Padmaja, M & Dash, Ajit Kumar, 2024. "Socioeconomic determinants of happiness: Empirical evidence from developed and developing countries," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    9. Xuan Tian & Cheng Zhang & Bing Xu, 2022. "The Impact of Air Pollution on Residents’ Happiness: A Study on the Moderating Effect Based on Pollution Sensitivity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-20, June.
    10. Xiaocang Xu & Yanglin Zhong & Shuangshuang Cai & Lei Lei & Jian Peng, 2025. "Does Air Pollution Aggravate Health Problems in Low-Income Countries? Verification from Countries Along the Belt and Road," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Xiaowei Ding & Panfeng Wang & Xuyan Jiang & Wenyi Zhang & Boris I. Sokolov & Yali Liu, 2024. "Impact of Urban Air Quality on Total Factor Productivity: Empirical Insights from Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-24, April.
    12. Yongsong Wu & Yang Cao, 2023. "Research on the Influence of Ecological Environment Satisfaction and Income Level on Chinese Residents’ Happiness: Empirical Analysis Based on CGSS Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, May.
    13. Marco Filippo Torchio & Umberto Lucia & Giulia Grisolia, 2024. "Development Indexes, Environmental Cost Impact, and Well-Being: Trends and Comparisons in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, May.
    14. Lindelwa Nonjabulo Dlamini & Kowiyou Yessoufou, 2022. "Residents and Professionals’ Perspectives on Energy and Water Consumption While Transiting from Conventional to Sustainable Housings in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    15. Qi Zhang & Hongyang Li & Xin Wan & Martin Skitmore & Hailin Sun, 2020. "An Intelligent Waste Removal System for Smarter Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-27, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1546-:d:1590402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.