IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i8p4498-d790544.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Residents and Professionals’ Perspectives on Energy and Water Consumption While Transiting from Conventional to Sustainable Housings in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Lindelwa Nonjabulo Dlamini

    (Department of Geography, Environmental Management and Energy Studies, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

  • Kowiyou Yessoufou

    (Department of Geography, Environmental Management and Energy Studies, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

Abstract

The concept of sustainable construction is, unfortunately, not implemented in many developing countries, and even where it is, e.g., South Africa, the uptake is still slow. In the present study, we evaluate, based on residents and professionals’ perspectives, the sustainability measures implemented at the Belhar Gardens Rental Estate (BGRE), a sustainable housing rated for its Excellence in Design for Greater Efficiencies (EDGE) in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. Data were collected through questionnaires administered to experienced professionals (n = 19) and residents (n = 106) of BGRE and analysed using descriptive statistics and a modelling approach. We found that 95% of professionals were aware of the concept of sustainable construction, and 74% were aware of the National Building Act 103 of 1977. However, some barriers to sustainable construction were raised: (i) it is expensive and (ii) there is a limited knowledge of how the sustainability concept can benefit the construction industry. Ecological design and procurement are the solutions proposed by professionals to mainstream sustainable construction in South Africa. Finally, 63% of the professionals indicated that the centralized heat pumps installed in BGRE lead to efficient energy use. Surprisingly, only 61% of residents are aware that energy-saving measures are implemented in BGRE, and only 40% of the residents agree that the energy-saving measures implemented are efficient. Interestingly, 65% of residents indicated that energy consumption in BGRE is less than what they consumed in conventional housings. Finally, none of the variables tested (age, gender and residence time) correlate with residents’ satisfaction with sustainability measures in BGRE, making it difficult to predict what drives people’s satisfaction in an EDGE-rated housing. By identifying the barriers and benefits of sustainable construction, we provide opportunities on which to press to improve the awareness, mainstreaming and uptake of the sustainable construction approach in South Africa.

Suggested Citation

  • Lindelwa Nonjabulo Dlamini & Kowiyou Yessoufou, 2022. "Residents and Professionals’ Perspectives on Energy and Water Consumption While Transiting from Conventional to Sustainable Housings in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4498-:d:790544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4498/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4498/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abimbola Olukemi Windapo, 2014. "Examination of Green Building Drivers in the South African Construction Industry: Economics versus Ecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Schimschar, Sven & Blok, Kornelis & Boermans, Thomas & Hermelink, Andreas, 2011. "Germany's path towards nearly zero-energy buildings--Enabling the greenhouse gas mitigation potential in the building stock," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3346-3360, June.
    3. Hye Gi Kim & Sun Sook Kim, 2020. "Occupants’ Awareness of and Satisfaction with Green Building Technologies in a Certified Office Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Serdar Durdyev & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Derek Thurnell & Audrius Banaitis & Ali Ihtiyar, 2018. "Sustainable Construction Industry in Cambodia: Awareness, Drivers and Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Min Jee Nikki Han & Mi Jeong Kim, 2019. "Green Environments and Happiness Level in Housing Areas toward a Sustainable Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-18, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ioannis Vardopoulos & Ioannis Vannas & George Xydis & Constantinos Vassiliades, 2023. "Homeowners’ Perceptions of Renewable Energy and Market Value of Sustainable Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Ayomikun Solomon Adewumi & Alex Opoku & Zainab Dangana, 2024. "Sustainability assessment frameworks for delivering Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) targets: A case of Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) UK New Const," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3779-3791, September.
    3. Liang Ma & Yun Le & Hongyang Li & Ruoyu Jin & Poorang Piroozfar & Mingqiang Liu, 2018. "Regional Comparisons of Contemporary Construction Industry Sustainable Concepts in the Chinese Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Mostafa E. Shahen & Shibly Shahrier & Koji Kotani, 2019. "Happiness, Generativity and Social Preferences in a Developing Country: A Possibility of Future Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Jin Kook Yang & Le Dinh Thuc & Pham Phu Cuong & Nguyen Van Du & Huu‐Bang Tran, 2023. "Evaluating a driving index of nonresidential green building implementation for sustainable development in developing countries from a Vietnamese perspective," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1720-1734, June.
    6. Reza Kiani Mavi & Denise Gengatharen & Neda Kiani Mavi & Richard Hughes & Alistair Campbell & Ross Yates, 2021. "Sustainability in Construction Projects: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    7. Yinan Li & Neng Zhu & Beibei Qin, 2019. "Major Barriers to the New Residential Building Energy-Efficiency Promotion in China: Frontlines’ Perceptions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, March.
    8. Serdar Durdyev & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Derek Thurnell & Audrius Banaitis & Ali Ihtiyar, 2018. "Sustainable Construction Industry in Cambodia: Awareness, Drivers and Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    9. Marilyn Brown, 2015. "Innovative energy‐efficiency policies: an international review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(1), pages 1-25, January.
    10. Clune, Stephen & Morrissey, John & Moore, Trivess, 2012. "Size matters: House size and thermal efficiency as policy strategies to reduce net emissions of new developments," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 657-667.
    11. Cakraningrat Kencana Murti & Fadhilah Muslim, 2023. "Relationship between Functions, Drivers, Barriers, and Strategies of Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Sustainable Construction Criteria: Indonesia Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-27, March.
    12. Laura Treviño-Lozano, 2022. "Framing Social Sustainability in Infrastructure Theory and Practice: A Review of Two Road Projects in Mexico from a Business and Human Rights Lens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    13. Savvides, Andreas & Vassiliades, Constantinos & Michael, Aimilios & Kalogirou, Soteris, 2019. "Siting and building-massing considerations for the urban integration of active solar energy systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 963-974.
    14. Bauermann, Klaas, 2016. "German Energiewende and the heating market – Impact and limits of policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 235-246.
    15. Tori, Felipe & Bustamante, Waldo & Vera, Sergio, 2022. "Analysis of Net Zero Energy Buildings public policies at the residential building sector: A comparison between Chile and selected countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    16. Yu Zhou, 2021. "Qujing (å –ç» ) as policy mobility with Chinese characteristics: A case study of ultralow-energy building policy in China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(2), pages 410-427, March.
    17. Nomeda Dobrovolskienė & Anastasija Pozniak & Manuela Tvaronavičienė, 2021. "Assessment of the Sustainability of a Real Estate Project Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    18. Karytsas, Spyridon & Choropanitis, Ioannis, 2017. "Barriers against and actions towards renewable energy technologies diffusion: A Principal Component Analysis for residential ground source heat pump (GSHP) systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 252-271.
    19. Lavinia Denisia Cuc & Dana Rad & Daniel Manațe & Silviu Gabriel Szentesi & Anca Dicu & Mioara Florina Pantea & Vanina Adoriana Trifan & Cosmin Silviu Raul Joldeș & Graziella Corina Bâtcă-Dumitru, 2023. "Representations of the Smart Green Concept and the Intention to Implement IoT in Romanian Real Estate Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    20. Albert Ping Chuen Chan & Amos Darko & Ernest Effah Ameyaw, 2017. "Strategies for Promoting Green Building Technologies Adoption in the Construction Industry—An International Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4498-:d:790544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.