IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1399-d1586724.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon Abatement Technology Transformation and Correlated Risks in the Airline Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Xu

    (Economics and Management College, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China)

  • Han Yin

    (School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China)

  • Min Sun

    (Economics and Management College, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China)

  • Mengyu Wang

    (Economics and Management College, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China)

  • Kaiwen Shen

    (Economics and Management College, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China)

  • Jie Ji

    (School of Arts, Design & Architecture, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

Abstract

The airline industry is currently navigating a pivotal period characterized by rapid development and increasing global pressure to reduce carbon emissions. Airlines, as the first to be significantly impacted, must actively manage their carbon footprints, adopt carbon abatement technologies, and address the inherent risks in this transformation. This paper examines the risk factors correlated with the technology transformation of carbon abatement and proposes effective abatement strategies. Using panel data of China Southern Airlines from 2009 to 2023 and applying the Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) method based on the Kaya identity, we analyze the differential impacts of various factors on unit carbon emissions. Multiple scenarios, derived from the influences of these factors, are constructed, and the Monte Carlo algorithm is employed to simulate the impact and volatility of correlated risks in the technology transformation for the abatement of carbon emissions. The findings are as follows: on the one hand, carbon emissions are strongly driven by energy consumption (0.99), flight volume (0.941), flight hours (0.931), transportation turnover (0.923), and take-off frequency (0.833). On the other hand, technology (56%) and scale (54.74%) significantly reduce unit carbon emissions, while take-off frequency negatively impacts emissions (−35.19%). Technology-related risks are controllable and relatively stable, whereas scale-related risks are highly uncertain. Additionally, operation-related risks can be partially hedged to ensure a certain level of risk controllability.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Xu & Han Yin & Min Sun & Mengyu Wang & Kaiwen Shen & Jie Ji, 2025. "Carbon Abatement Technology Transformation and Correlated Risks in the Airline Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-22, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1399-:d:1586724
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1399/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1399/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Peiwen & Ding, Rui, 2023. "How to achieve carbon abatement in aviation with hybrid mechanism? A stochastic evolutionary game model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    2. Zhang, M.M. & Zhou, P. & Zhou, D.Q., 2016. "A real options model for renewable energy investment with application to solar photovoltaic power generation in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 213-226.
    3. Peng Du & Lei Xu & Rou Luo & Mingzhu Hou, 2024. "Competing with Low Cost Carrier in a Sustainable Environment: Airline Ticket Pricing, Carbon Trading, and Market Power Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Guilherme Magacho & Etienne Espagne & Antoine Godin, 2024. "Impacts of the CBAM on EU trade partners: consequences for developing countries," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 243-259, February.
    5. Lei Xu & Zhenzhen Lu & Zhiping Kang & Yingwen Duan & Junwei Zhang, 2023. "Carbon Emission Intensity and Its Abatement Choices: A Case of China Eastern," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Emanuele Campiglio & Frederick van der Ploeg, 2022. "Macrofinancial Risks of the Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 16(2), pages 173-195.
    7. Brueckner, Jan K. & Abreu, Chrystyane, 2017. "Airline fuel usage and carbon emissions: Determining factors," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 10-17.
    8. Li, Ye & Cui, Qiang, 2018. "Investigating the role of cooperation in the GHG abatement costs of airlines under CNG2020 strategy via a DEA cross PAC model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 725-736.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Casper Agaton, 2017. "Coal, Renewable, or Nuclear? A Real Options Approach to Energy Investments in the Philippines," International Journal of Sustainable Energy and Environmental Research, Conscientia Beam, vol. 6(2), pages 50-62.
    2. Gkousis, Spiros & Welkenhuysen, Kris & Harcouët-Menou, Virginie & Pogacnik, Justin & Laenen, Ben & Compernolle, Tine, 2024. "Integrated geo-techno-economic and real options analysis of the decision to invest in a medium enthalpy deep geothermal heating plant. A case study in Northern Belgium," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    3. Mayeres, Inge & Proost, Stef & Delhaye, Eef & Novelli, Philippe & Conijn, Sjaak & Gómez-Jiménez, Inmaculada & Rivas-Brousse, Daniel, 2023. "Climate ambitions for European aviation: Where can sustainable aviation fuels bring us?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    4. Jungmin An & Dong-Kwan Kim & Jinyeong Lee & Sung-Kwan Joo, 2021. "Least Squares Monte Carlo Simulation-Based Decision-Making Method for Photovoltaic Investment in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Huang, Robert & Kahn, Matthew E., 2024. "An economic analysis of United States public transit carbon emissions dynamics," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    6. Campiglio, Emanuele & Lamperti, Francesco & Terranova, Roberta, 2024. "Believe me when I say green! Heterogeneous expectations and climate policy uncertainty," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    7. Moon, Yongma & Baran, Mesut, 2018. "Economic analysis of a residential PV system from the timing perspective: A real option model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 783-795.
    8. Zhang, M.M. & Wang, Qunwei & Zhou, Dequn & Ding, H., 2019. "Evaluating uncertain investment decisions in low-carbon transition toward renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 1049-1060.
    9. Liu, Xiaoran & Ronn, Ehud I., 2020. "Using the binomial model for the valuation of real options in computing optimal subsidies for Chinese renewable energy investments," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    10. Zhao, Qian & Su, Chi-Wei & Qin, Meng & Umar, Muhammad, 2023. "Is global renewable energy development a curse or blessing for economic growth? Evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    11. Zhang, M.M. & Zhou, D.Q. & Zhou, P. & Chen, H.T., 2017. "Optimal design of subsidy to stimulate renewable energy investments: The case of China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 873-883.
    12. Hemrit, Wael & Benlagha, Noureddine, 2021. "Does renewable energy index respond to the pandemic uncertainty?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 336-347.
    13. Gaitan, Ioan & Yun, Gawon & Joo, Harry & Hwang, Sunil, 2024. "Understanding military pilots’ fuel-saving intentions for supporting logistics missions," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    14. Lyu, Chen & Liu, Xiaoman & Wang, Zhen & Yang, Lu & Liu, Hao & Yang, Nan & Xu, Shaodong & Cao, Libin & Zhang, Zhe & Pang, Lingyun & Zhang, Li & Cai, Bofeng, 2023. "An emissions inventory using flight information reveals the long-term changes of aviation CO2 emissions in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    15. Lin, Boqiang & Wu, Wei, 2017. "Cost of long distance electricity transmission in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 132-140.
    16. Kodad Rajaa & Jingfeng Yuan & Lei Zhang & Junwei Ma & Lei Zhang, 2021. "External Factors Affecting Investment in Overseas Electric Power Projects," Springer Books, in: Gui Ye & Hongping Yuan & Jian Zuo (ed.), Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, pages 1455-1472, Springer.
    17. Li, Yan & Zhang, Qi & Wang, Ge & McLellan, Benjamin & Liu, Xue Fei & Wang, Le, 2018. "A review of photovoltaic poverty alleviation projects in China: Current status, challenge and policy recommendations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 214-223.
    18. Perdana, Sigit & Vielle, Marc, 2022. "Making the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism acceptable and climate friendly for least developed countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    19. Locatelli, Giorgio & Mancini, Mauro & Lotti, Giovanni, 2020. "A simple-to-implement real options method for the energy sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    20. Steinhauser Dušan & Kittová Zuzana & Khúlová Lucia, 2024. "Relationship Between CO2 Emissions and Trade: The Case of the EU," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Sciendo, vol. 59(1), pages 41-47, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1399-:d:1586724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.