IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i3p965-d1576586.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mechanism of Crack Development and Strength Deterioration in Controlled Low-Strength Material in Dry Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Peng

    (School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou 310015, China)

  • Zili Dai

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

Abstract

The continuous expansion at the urban scale has produced a lot of construction waste, which has created increasingly serious problems in the environmental, social, and economic realms. Reuse of this waste can address these problems and is critical for sustainable development. In recent years, construction waste has been extensively recycled and transformed into highly sustainable construction materials called controlled low-strength materials (CLSMs) in backfilling projects, pile foundation treatment, roadbed cushion layers, and other applications. However, CLSMs often experience shrinkage and cracking due to water loss influenced by climatic temperature factors, which can pose safety and stability risks in various infrastructures. The purpose of this paper was to study the mechanism of crack formation and strength degradation in a CLSM in a dry environment and to analyze the deterioration process of the CLSM at the macro- and micro-scales by using image analysis techniques and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The test results show that with the drying time, the CLSM samples had different degrees of cracks and unconfined compressive strength (UCS) decreases, and increasing the content of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) reduced the number of cracks. The addition of bentonite with the same OPC content also slowed down the crack development and reduced the loss of UCS. The development of macroscopic cracks and UCS is caused by the microscopic scale, and the weak areas are formed due to water loss in dry environments and the decomposition of gel products, and the integrity of the microstructure is weakened, which is manifested as strength deterioration. This research provides a novel methodology for the reuse of construction waste, thereby offering a novel trajectory for the sustainable progression of construction projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Peng & Zili Dai, 2025. "Mechanism of Crack Development and Strength Deterioration in Controlled Low-Strength Material in Dry Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:965-:d:1576586
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/965/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/965/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Duan, Huabo & Wang, Jiayuan & Huang, Qifei, 2015. "Encouraging the environmentally sound management of C&D waste in China: An integrative review and research agenda," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 611-620.
    2. Hailong Liu & Jiuye Zhao & Yu Wang & Nangai Yi & Chunyi Cui, 2021. "Strength Performance and Microstructure of Calcium Sulfoaluminate Cement-Stabilized Soft Soil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-10, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Madduma Kaluge Chamitha Sanjani Wijewickrama & Nicholas Chileshe & Raufdeen Rameezdeen & Jose Jorge Ochoa, 2021. "Minimizing Macro-Level Uncertainties for Quality Assurance in Reverse Logistics Supply Chains of Demolition Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-35, November.
    2. Dongchen Han & Mohsen Kalantari & Abbas Rajabifard, 2021. "Building Information Modeling (BIM) for Construction and Demolition Waste Management in Australia: A Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Israt Jahan & Guomin Zhang & Muhammed Bhuiyan & Satheeskumar Navaratnam, 2022. "Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Wood Waste—A Theoretical Framework Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-26, August.
    4. Zhikun Ding & Wenyan Gong & Shenghan Li & Zezhou Wu, 2018. "System Dynamics versus Agent-Based Modeling: A Review of Complexity Simulation in Construction Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Lingshi An & Junhao Chen & Dongwei Li & Peng Li & Lei Guo & Guanren Chen, 2022. "Accumulative Strain of Sand-Containing Soft Soil Reinforced by Cement and Sodium Silicate under Traffic Loading," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Tong Huang & Shicong Kou & Deyou Liu & Dawang Li & Feng Xing, 2022. "Evaluation of the Techno-Economic Feasibility for Excavated Soil Recycling in Shenzhen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Garlapati, Vijay Kumar, 2016. "E-waste in India and developed countries: Management, recycling, business and biotechnological initiatives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 874-881.
    8. Slobodan B. Mickovski, 2021. "Sustainable Geotechnics—Theory, Practice, and Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-4, May.
    9. Zhang, Ning & Duan, Huabo & Miller, Travis R. & Tam, Vivian W.Y. & Liu, Gang & Zuo, Jian, 2020. "Mitigation of carbon dioxide by accelerated sequestration in concrete debris," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    10. Fangsheng Yang & Taibo Cao & Tingrong Zhang & Junfeng Hu & Xinrui Wang & Zhikun Ding & Zezhou Wu, 2023. "An Implementation Framework for On-Site Shield Spoil Utilization—A Case Study of a Metro Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Volk, Rebekka & Müller, Richard & Reinhardt, Joachim & Schultmann, Frank, 2019. "An Integrated Material Flows, Stakeholders and Policies Approach to Identify and Exploit Regional Resource Potentials," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 292-320.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:965-:d:1576586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.