IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i3p835-d1572680.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discussing Food Waste Online: Current Trends in the Food Processing Industry and Future Directions

Author

Listed:
  • Florian Rösler

    (iSuN—Institute of Sustainable Nutrition, FH Münster University of Applied Sciences, 48149 Münster, Germany)

  • Judith Kreyenschmidt

    (Department of Fresh Produce Logistics Professorship for Quality & Processing Fresh Produce, Hochschule Geisenheim University, 65366 Geisenheim, Germany)

  • Guido Ritter

    (iSuN—Institute of Sustainable Nutrition, FH Münster University of Applied Sciences, 48149 Münster, Germany)

Abstract

Food loss and waste is a recurring issue of discussion that food processing companies can no longer avoid. Society, stakeholders, and directives are demanding more and more communication on sustainability issues. However, only just under half of food processing companies stated that they provide consumer information on food waste. However, consumer information is only one way of communicating about food waste. The aim of this study is to identify key themes for relevant online communication on food waste that companies should be communicating to support the German National Strategy for the Reduction of Food Waste and to determine whether companies are already using these themes online. For this purpose, national strategy experts were asked through a questionnaire which topics were relevant according to the national strategy. The websites of 105 food processing companies were analyzed using content analysis to determine the status quo of food waste communication and assessed for relevance according to the national strategy. This paper presents five prioritized clusters of topics for relevant online communication on food waste for companies. The top priorities for communication, Cluster 1, are “Business Goals”, “Business Strategy”, “Process”, “Consumer Information”, “In-house Transparency”, and “Utilization of Remaining Materials”. The status quo shows that 43.8% of the companies provided online content regarding food waste. Through theory-driven content analysis, the three most common topics were identified in relation to food waste, namely the following: “Business Goals”, “Product and Packaging”, and “Consumer Information”. Companies communicated in line with the priority clusters. However, the frequency of topics and the way they are communicated varies widely. Only “Consumer Information” and “Business Goals” from Cluster 1 are commonly communicated. During the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine, there was a decline in publications on food waste, and afterward, more consumer-oriented content was published rather than communicating the relevant topics. Companies are expected to have two objectives in their communication: to communicate with consumers and to be transparent about their targets, data, and utilization of food waste. The results also show differences between subsectors, the occurrence of the topics over time, and examples. The findings are aimed at policymakers, researchers, and companies as a starting point for improving the consistency and transparency of food waste communication in line with the national strategy. The results are also of international interest due to the common challenges of food waste and international food companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Florian Rösler & Judith Kreyenschmidt & Guido Ritter, 2025. "Discussing Food Waste Online: Current Trends in the Food Processing Industry and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-44, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:835-:d:1572680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/835/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/835/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Björn Bartling & Vanessa Valero & Roberto A. Weber & Lan Yao, 2024. "Public Discourse and Socially Responsible Market Behavior," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(10), pages 3041-3074, October.
    2. C. William Young & Sally V. Russell & Cheryl A. Robinson & Phani Kumar Chintakayala, 2018. "Sustainable Retailing – Influencing Consumer Behaviour on Food Waste," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Sahar Ahmadzadeh & Tahmina Ajmal & Ramakrishnan Ramanathan & Yanqing Duan, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review on Food Waste Reduction Based on IoT and Big Data Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Cãtãlina Gorgan & Ionela-Corina Chersan & Voicu D. Dragomir & Mãdãlina Dumitru, 2022. "Food Waste Prevention Solutions in the Annual Reports of European Companies," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(60), pages 309-309, April.
    5. Christina Strotmann & Christine Göbel & Silke Friedrich & Judith Kreyenschmidt & Guido Ritter & Petra Teitscheid, 2017. "A Participatory Approach to Minimizing Food Waste in the Food Industry—A Manual for Managers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Christine Göbel & Nina Langen & Antonia Blumenthal & Petra Teitscheid & Guido Ritter, 2015. "Cutting Food Waste through Cooperation along the Food Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Florian Rösler & Judith Kreyenschmidt & Guido Ritter, 2023. "“Low-Hanging Fruits” against Food Waste and Their Status Quo in the Food Processing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Gudrun Obersteiner & Marta Cociancig & Sandra Luck & Johannes Mayerhofer, 2021. "Impact of Optimized Packaging on Food Waste Prevention Potential among Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-23, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Florian Rösler & Judith Kreyenschmidt & Guido Ritter, 2023. "“Low-Hanging Fruits” against Food Waste and Their Status Quo in the Food Processing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Christina Strotmann & Linda Niepagenkemper & Christine Göbel & Fara Flügge & Silke Friedrich & Judith Kreyenschmidt & Guido Ritter, 2017. "Improving Transfer in the Food Sector by Applying a Target Audience-Centered Approach—The Development of a Nonprofit Marketing Campaign Guide Based on a Case Study of the LAV Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-26, March.
    3. Florian Rösler & Judith Kreyenschmidt & Guido Ritter, 2021. "Recommendation of Good Practice in the Food-Processing Industry for Preventing and Handling Food Loss and Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-30, August.
    4. Caiyun Liu & Hui Jiang & Daniel Badulescu & Dorin Paul Bac, 2022. "Achieving Zero Hunger Goal through Minimizing Waste in Food Supply Chain: Evidence from Asian Emerging Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-12, May.
    5. Jakob Keller & Martin Jung & Rainer Lasch, 2022. "Sustainability Governance: Insights from a Cocoa Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-23, August.
    6. Andrea Gallo & Riccardo Accorsi & Giulia Baruffaldi & Riccardo Manzini, 2017. "Designing Sustainable Cold Chains for Long-Range Food Distribution: Energy-Effective Corridors on the Silk Road Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Nguyen Thi Nha Trang & Thanh-Thuy Nguyen & Hong V. Pham & Thi Thu Anh Cao & Thu Huong Trinh Thi & Javad Shahreki, 2022. "Impacts of Collaborative Partnership on the Performance of Cold Supply Chains of Agriculture and Foods: Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-28, May.
    8. Aschemann-Witzel, Jessica & de Hooge, Ilona E. & Almli, Valérie L., 2021. "My style, my food, my waste! Consumer food waste-related lifestyle segments," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    9. Clara Cicatiello & Emanuele Blasi & Claudia Giordano & Angelo Martella & Silvio Franco, 2020. "“If only I Could Decide”: Opinions of Food Category Managers on in-Store Food Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Elnur Nabivi, 2020. "Implementation of Green Marketing Concept Through Social Media Activities: A Systematic Literature Review," Journal of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour in Emerging Markets, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 2(11), pages 55-67.
    11. Ghosh, R.K. & Eriksson, M. & Istamov, A., 2018. "Food waste due to coercive power in agri-food chains: Evidence from Sweden," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277496, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Massimiliano Cerciello, 2021. "Spatial patterns in food waste at the local level. A preliminary analysis for Italian data," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(1), pages 83-101, February.
    13. Elżbieta Goryńska-Goldmann & Michał Gazdecki & Krystyna Rejman & Joanna Kobus-Cisowska & Sylwia Łaba & Robert Łaba, 2020. "How to Prevent Bread Losses in the Baking and Confectionery Industry?—Measurement, Causes, Management and Prevention," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.
    14. Fang Qiu & Qifan Hu & Bing Xu, 2020. "Fresh Agricultural Products Supply Chain Coordination and Volume Loss Reduction Based on Strategic Consumer," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-25, October.
    15. Quan Zhu & Harold Krikke, 2020. "Managing a Sustainable and Resilient Perishable Food Supply Chain (PFSC) after an Outbreak," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-11, June.
    16. Prakash Singh & Lokesh Arora & Abdulaziz Choudhry, 2022. "Consumer Behavior in the Service Industry: An Integrative Literature Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-30, December.
    17. Irma Cristina Espitia Moreno & Betzabé Ruiz Morales & Víctor G. Alfaro-García & Marco A. Miranda-Ackerman, 2024. "Agri-Food Management and Sustainable Practices: A Fuzzy Clustering Application Using the Galois Lattice," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-14, June.
    18. Roland Bénabou & Armin Falk & Luca Henkel & Jean Tirole, 2020. "Eliciting Moral Preferences: Theory and Experiment," Working Papers 2020-17, Princeton University. Economics Department..
    19. Jiang, J.-Q. & Yu, T. & Wang, Z.-H. & Qi, D.-M & Huang, W.-Z, 2018. "Analyzing the Size and Affecting Factors of Household Food Waste in China," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277551, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Lijing Zhu, 2017. "Economic Analysis of a Traceability System for a Two-Level Perishable Food Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-16, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:835-:d:1572680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.