IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i3p1309-d1584685.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Gardening and Public Health—A Bibliometric Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Haluza

    (Department of Environmental Health, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, 1090 Vienna, Austria)

  • Julia Ortmann

    (Department of Environmental Health, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, 1090 Vienna, Austria
    Department of General Surgery, General Hospital of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria)

  • Tanja Lazic

    (Department of Environmental Health, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, 1090 Vienna, Austria)

  • Jonas Hillmer

    (Department of Environmental Health, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, 1090 Vienna, Austria)

Abstract

Background: Urban gardening enhances public health in urban environments by creating green spaces that encourage physical activity, provide access to fresh food, and support mental well-being. These initiatives also strengthen social connections, alleviate stress, and contribute to environmental sustainability, thus addressing health disparities and enhancing quality of life. This study offers a bibliometric analysis of urban gardening research from 1991 to 2020, highlighting trends and implications for public health. Methods: We employed a bibliometric analysis using the free mapping software VOSviewer (version 1.6.19) to generate co-occurrence networks of keywords and bibliographic coupling networks of documents. The dataset spans three decades, focusing on the evolution of research topics and geographical patterns. Results: This research field has grown steadily since the early 1990s. Over the last two decades, the focus has shifted from addressing poverty and food security to exploring urban gardening’s impact on human well-being and quality of life, predominantly in developed countries. Recent studies highlight the differentiated impacts of urban gardening on various socioeconomic groups. Despite robust evidence of public health benefits, policy implementation remains limited, with researchers emphasizing the need for more quantitative data to inform decisions. Conclusions: Urban gardening research has evolved to address contemporary urban health challenges, showcasing its potential to improve well-being and foster community resilience. Strengthening data quality and fostering collaboration between researchers and policymakers are critical for advancing the role of urban gardening in creating healthier cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Haluza & Julia Ortmann & Tanja Lazic & Jonas Hillmer, 2025. "Urban Gardening and Public Health—A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1309-:d:1584685
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1309/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1309/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weishu Liu & Meiting Huang & Haifeng Wang, 2021. "Same journal but different numbers of published records indexed in Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection: causes, consequences, and solutions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 4541-4550, May.
    2. Philippe Mongeon & Adèle Paul-Hus, 2016. "The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(1), pages 213-228, January.
    3. Leo Capari & Harald Wilfing & Andreas Exner & Thomas Höflehner & Daniela Haluza, 2022. "Cooling the City? A Scientometric Study on Urban Green and Blue Infrastructure and Climate Change-Induced Public Health Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Contesse, Maria & van Vliet, Bas J.M. & Lenhart, Jennifer, 2018. "Is urban agriculture urban green space? A comparison of policy arrangements for urban green space and urban agriculture in Santiago de Chile," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 566-577.
    5. Raminta Pranckutė, 2021. "Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-59, March.
    6. Akane Bessho & Toru Terada & Makoto Yokohari, 2020. "Immigrants’ “Role Shift” for Sustainable Urban Communities: A Case Study of Toronto’s Multiethnic Community Farm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Florian Reinwald & Daniela Haluza & Ulrike Pitha & Rosemarie Stangl, 2021. "Urban Green Infrastructure and Green Open Spaces: An Issue of Social Fairness in Times of COVID-19 Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-9, September.
    8. Way Inn Koay & Denise Dillon, 2020. "Community Gardening: Stress, Well-Being, and Resilience Potentials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-31, September.
    9. Neil Harris & Fiona Rowe Minniss & Shawn Somerset, 2014. "Refugees Connecting with a New Country through Community Food Gardening," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, September.
    10. Miguel-Angel Vera-Baceta & Michael Thelwall & Kayvan Kousha, 2019. "Web of Science and Scopus language coverage," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(3), pages 1803-1813, December.
    11. Van Tuijl Erwin & Hospers Gert-Jan & Van Den Berg Leo, 2018. "Opportunities and Challenges of Urban Agriculture for Sustainable City Development," European Spatial Research and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 25(2), pages 5-22, December.
    12. Chethika Gunasiri Wadumestrige Dona & Geetha Mohan & Kensuke Fukushi, 2021. "Promoting Urban Agriculture and Its Opportunities and Challenges—A Global Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    13. Karoline Braun & Daniela Haluza, 2024. "Impact of Biodiversity Loss on Pollen Allergies: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-18, October.
    14. O'Sullivan, C.A. & Bonnett, G.D. & McIntyre, C.L. & Hochman, Z. & Wasson, A.P., 2019. "Strategies to improve the productivity, product diversity and profitability of urban agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 133-144.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dušan Nikolić & Dragan Ivanović & Lidija Ivanović, 2024. "An open-source tool for merging data from multiple citation databases," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(7), pages 4573-4595, July.
    2. Michael Gusenbauer, 2022. "Search where you will find most: Comparing the disciplinary coverage of 56 bibliographic databases," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(5), pages 2683-2745, May.
    3. Congying Fang & Riken Homma & Tianfu Qiu, 2024. "A Bibliometrics Analysis Related to the Built Environment and Walking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Pantea Kamrani & Isabelle Dorsch & Wolfgang G. Stock, 2021. "Do researchers know what the h-index is? And how do they estimate its importance?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 5489-5508, July.
    5. Mike Thelwall, 2021. "Alternative medicines worth researching? Citation analyses of acupuncture, chiropractic, homeopathy, and osteopathy 1996–2017," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(10), pages 8731-8747, October.
    6. Virginia Milone & Antonio Fusco & Angelamaria De Feo & Marco Tatullo, 2024. "Clinical Impact of “Real World Data” and Blockchain on Public Health: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(1), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Bhavna Thawani & Tushar Panigrahi & Meena Bhatia, 2024. "Eleven years of integrated reporting: a bibliometric analysis," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(4), pages 666-684, December.
    8. Andrzej Lis & Agata Sudolska & Mateusz Tomanek, 2020. "Mapping Research on Sustainable Supply-Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-26, May.
    9. David Moroz, 2024. "What does terroir mean? A science mapping of a multidimensional concept," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(3), pages 889-913, September.
    10. Carlos Sánchez‐Camacho & Rocío Carranza & David Martín‐Consuegra & Estrella Díaz, 2022. "Evolution, trends and future research lines in corporate social responsibility and tourism: A bibliometric analysis and science mapping," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(3), pages 462-476, June.
    11. Alicia Sianes-Bautista & Fátima Rosado-Castellano & Cruz Flores-Rodríguez, 2022. "Research Trends in Education in the Context of COVID-19 in Spain: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, September.
    12. Raf Vanderstraeten & Frédéric Vandermoere, 2021. "Inequalities in the growth of Web of Science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(10), pages 8635-8651, October.
    13. Tobias Ihle & Ellen Jahr & Dörte Martens & Holger Muehlan & Silke Schmidt, 2024. "Health Effects of Participation in Creating Urban Green Spaces—A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-26, June.
    14. Sophie Kathrin Schaffernicht & Andreas Türk & Martha Kogler & Andreas Berger & Bernhard Scharf & Lukas Clementschitsch & Renate Hammer & Peter Holzer & Herbert Formayer & Barbara König & Daniela Haluz, 2023. "Heat vs. Health: Home Office under a Changing Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-24, April.
    15. Shir Aviv-Reuven & Ariel Rosenfeld, 2023. "A logical set theory approach to journal subject classification analysis: intra-system irregularities and inter-system discrepancies in Web of Science and Scopus," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(1), pages 157-175, January.
    16. Domicián Máté & Ni Made Estiyanti & Adam Novotny, 2024. "How to support innovative small firms? Bibliometric analysis and visualization of start-up incubation," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, December.
    17. Hernández-Torrano, Daniel & Karabassova, Laura & Izekenova, Zhanna & Courtney, Matthew G.R., 2021. "Mapping education research in post-Soviet countries: A bibliometric analysis," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    18. Shome, Samik & Hassan, M. Kabir & Verma, Sushma & Panigrahi, Tushar Ranjan, 2023. "Impact investment for sustainable development: A bibliometric analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 770-800.
    19. Biru Desta Kassaye & Yitbarek Takele Bayiley & Zerihun Kinde Alemu, 2025. "Returnee migrant entrepreneurship: a bibliometric analysis (1993–2024)," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    20. Yan Zhou & Chunjui Wei & Yong Zhou, 2022. "How Does Urban Farming Benefit Participants? Two Case Studies of the Garden City Initiative in Taipei," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1309-:d:1584685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.