IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i3p1157-d1581211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bridging the Gap to Sustainability: How Culture and Context Shape Green Transparency in Chinese Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan Zhang

    (Business School, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)

Abstract

Green transparency motivates organizations to decrease environmental hazard emissions, improve ecological safeguarding behavior, and increase environmental performance. However, the current literature ignores the cultural and organizational factors behind green transparency behavior, which cannot answer stakeholders how to reduce barriers to green transparency to achieve sustainable goals. This study collected data from 207 Chinese companies listed on three stock exchanges (Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen) through an online survey to unfold the interplay between green transparency and contextual and organizational factors. The collected data were analyzed using PLS-SEM. The analysis revealed that environmental regulations, digitalization, innovation, and gender diversity significantly affect organizational sustainability culture. The findings also revealed that all these factors directly affect the green transparency of Chinese companies. Furthermore, mediation analysis revealed that organizational sustainability culture mediates the relationship between green transparency and all other study constructs. Short-term training programs regarding sustainability, mutual group discussion without gender discrimination, and supporting the use of digital tools may significantly develop a sustainability culture in the company and can improve firms’ green transparency.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan Zhang, 2025. "Bridging the Gap to Sustainability: How Culture and Context Shape Green Transparency in Chinese Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-23, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1157-:d:1581211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1157/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1157/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hess, David, 2007. "Social Reporting and New Governance Regulation: The Prospects of Achieving Corporate Accountability Through Transparency," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(3), pages 453-476, July.
    2. Aarti Gupta, 2008. "Transparency Under Scrutiny: Information Disclosure in Global Environmental Governance," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 8(2), pages 1-7, May.
    3. Maria Denisa Vasilescu & Gina Cristina Dimian & Giani Ionel Gradinaru, 2023. "Green entrepreneurship in challenging times: a quantitative approach for European countries," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 1828-1847, March.
    4. Caterina Hauschild & Angelica Coll, 2023. "The Influence of Technologies in Increasing Transparency in Textile Supply Chains," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Ishmael Tingbani & Lyton Chithambo & Venancio Tauringana & Nikolaos Papanikolaou, 2020. "Board gender diversity, environmental committee and greenhouse gas voluntary disclosures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2194-2210, September.
    6. Renée B. Adams & Patricia Funk, 2012. "Beyond the Glass Ceiling: Does Gender Matter?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 219-235, February.
    7. Alan Bandeira Pinheiro & Joina Ijuniclair Arruda Silva dos Santos & Marconi Freitas da Costa & Wendy Beatriz Witt Haddad Carraro, 2024. "Breaking through the glass ceiling: women on the board as a mechanism for greater environmental transparency," International Journal of Development Issues, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(3), pages 430-446, April.
    8. Ismail Khan & Imran Khan & Bilal bin Saeed, 2019. "Does board diversity affect quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure? Evidence from Pakistan," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1371-1381, November.
    9. Vladislav Valentinov & Gert Verschraegen & Kristof Van Assche, 2019. "The limits of transparency: A systems theory view," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 289-300, May.
    10. Darticléia Almeida Sampaio da Rocha Soares & Eduardo Camargo Oliva & Edson Keyso de Miranda Kubo & Virginia Parente & Karen Talita Tanaka, 2018. "Organizational culture and sustainability in Brazilian electricity companies," RAUSP Management Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 53(4), pages 488-506, October.
    11. Al-Shaer, Habiba & Zaman, Mahbub, 2016. "Board gender diversity and sustainability reporting quality," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 210-222.
    12. Azarnert, Leonid V., 2016. "Transportation Costs And The Great Divergence," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 214-228, January.
    13. Daxin Sun & Saixing Zeng & Hongquan Chen & Xiaohua Meng & Zhizhou Jin, 2019. "Monitoring effect of transparency: How does government environmental disclosure facilitate corporate environmentalism?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(8), pages 1594-1607, December.
    14. Tao Kong & RenJi Sun & Guanglin Sun & Youtao Song, 2022. "Effects of Digital Finance on Green Innovation considering Information Asymmetry: An Empirical Study Based on Chinese Listed Firms," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(15), pages 4399-4411, December.
    15. repec:eme:ijlma0:ijlma-01-2018-0011 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Lily Hsueh, 2019. "Voluntary climate action and credible regulatory threat: evidence from the carbon disclosure project," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 188-225, December.
    17. Wang, Chunhua & Wu, JunJie & Zhang, Bing, 2018. "Environmental regulation, emissions and productivity: Evidence from Chinese COD-emitting manufacturers," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 54-73.
    18. Banerjee, Subhabrata Bobby, 2002. "Corporate environmentalism: the construct and its measurement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 177-191, March.
    19. Sohail Ahmad Javeed & Boon Heng Teh & Tze San Ong & Lee Lee Chong & Mohd Fairuz Bin Abd Rahim & Rashid Latief, 2022. "How Does Green Innovation Strategy Influence Corporate Financing? Corporate Social Responsibility and Gender Diversity Play a Moderating Role," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-22, July.
    20. Qing Ye & Rongting Zhou & Muhammad Azfar Anwar & Ahmad Nabeel Siddiquei & Fahad Asmi, 2020. "Entrepreneurs and Environmental Sustainability in the Digital Era: Regional and Institutional Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-21, February.
    21. Pinyi Su & Muhammad Imran & Muhammad Nadeem & Shamsheer ul Haq, 2023. "The Role of Environmental Law in Farmers’ Environment-Protecting Intentions and Behavior Based on Their Legal Cognition: A Case Study of Jiangxi Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, May.
    22. Fabio Caputo & Simone Pizzi & Lorenzo Ligorio & Rossella Leopizzi, 2021. "Enhancing environmental information transparency through corporate social responsibility reporting regulation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3470-3484, December.
    23. Azarnert, Leonid V., 2010. "Is skilled immigration always good for growth in the receiving economy?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 108(2), pages 116-118, August.
    24. Ellen Pei‐yi Yu & Christine Qian Guo & Bac Van Luu, 2018. "Environmental, social and governance transparency and firm value," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 987-1004, November.
    25. Carol A. Adams, 2004. "The ethical, social and environmental reporting‐performance portrayal gap," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(5), pages 731-757, December.
    26. Reinartz, Werner & Haenlein, Michael & Henseler, Jörg, 2009. "An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 332-344.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caby, Jérôme & Coron, Clotilde & Ziane, Ydriss, 2024. "How does gender diversity in top management teams affect carbon disclosure and its quality: Evidence from the technological industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    2. Shujun Chao & Shanyong Wang & Haidong Li & Shu Yang, 2023. "The power of culture: Does Confucian culture contribute to corporate environmental information disclosure?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2435-2456, September.
    3. Fan, Yiyi & Li, Shanshan & Yang, WenQi, 2024. "The impact of the percentage of female directors on corporate ESG score," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    4. Yu‐Shan Chen & Xin Yan, 2022. "The small and medium enterprises' green human resource management and green transformational leadership: A sustainable moderated‐mediation practice," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1341-1356, September.
    5. Wunhong Su & Xingxing Hu & Liuzhen Zhang, 2023. "Association Between Directors With Foreign Experience and Firms’ Environmental Disclosure," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    6. Wu Ning & Ummar Faruk Saeed & Angelina Kissiwaa Twum & Abednego Osei, 2024. "Can ESG disclosures promote firms going concern? Evidence from BRICS countries," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3792-3803, September.
    7. Sara De Masi & Agnieszka Słomka‐Gołębiowska & Claudio Becagli & Andrea Paci, 2021. "Toward sustainable corporate behavior: The effect of the critical mass of female directors on environmental, social, and governance disclosure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1865-1878, May.
    8. Opoku, Eric Evans Osei & Kufuor, Nana Kwabena & Manu, Sylvester Adasi, 2021. "Gender, electricity access, renewable energy consumption and energy efficiency," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    9. ABM Fazle Rahi, 2025. "Unpacking women’s power on corporate boards: gender reward in board composition," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 64-80, March.
    10. McGuinness, Paul B., 2021. "Board member age, stock seasoning and the evolution of capital structure in Chinese firms," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(3).
    11. Saleh F. A. Khatib & Dewi Fariha Abdullah & Ahmed A. Elamer & Raed Abueid, 2021. "Nudging toward diversity in the boardroom: A systematic literature review of board diversity of financial institutions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 985-1002, February.
    12. Kara, Alper & Nanteza, Aziidah & Ozkan, Aydin & Yildiz, Yilmaz, 2022. "Board gender diversity and responsible banking during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    13. Wang, Haijun & Jiao, Shuaipeng & Ge, Chen & Sun, Guanglin, 2024. "Corporate ESG rating divergence and excess stock returns," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    14. Al Mamun, Md & Boubaker, Sabri & Hossain, Md Zakir & Manita, Riadh, 2024. "Female political empowerment and green finance," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    15. Trinh, Vu Quang & Trinh, Hai Hong & Li, Teng & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2024. "Climate change exposure, financial development, and the cost of debt: Evidence from EU countries," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    16. Chu, Shaner, 2024. "Are women greener? Board gender diversity and corporate green technology innovation in China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 1001-1020.
    17. María‐Florencia Amorelli & Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez, 2021. "Trends in the dynamic evolution of board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 537-554, March.
    18. Binh Bui & Muhammad Nurul Houqe & Mahbub Zaman, 2021. "Climate change mitigation: Carbon assurance and reporting integrity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3839-3853, December.
    19. Junhui Wang & Jerry Sun, 2022. "The role of audit committees in social responsibility and environmental disclosures: evidence from Chinese energy sector," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(1), pages 113-128, March.
    20. Frank Ebinger & Bramwel Omondi, 2020. "Leveraging Digital Approaches for Transparency in Sustainable Supply Chains: A Conceptual Paper," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-16, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1157-:d:1581211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.