IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i2p504-d1564267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Cyclists’ Accessibility into Railway Stations Through a User-Centered Indicator

Author

Listed:
  • Annalisa Zoli

    (Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental, and Materials Engineering (DICAM), University of Bologna, 40131 Bologna, Italy)

  • Margherita Pazzini

    (Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental, and Materials Engineering (DICAM), University of Bologna, 40131 Bologna, Italy)

  • Valeria Vignali

    (Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental, and Materials Engineering (DICAM), University of Bologna, 40131 Bologna, Italy)

  • Hocine Imine

    (Laboratoire sur la Perception, les Interactions, les Comportements et la Simulation des Usagers de la Route et de la Rue (PICS-L), Components and Systems Department (COSYS), Gustave Eiffel University, 77420 Champs sur Marne, France)

  • Andrea Simone

    (Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental, and Materials Engineering (DICAM), University of Bologna, 40131 Bologna, Italy)

  • Claudio Lantieri

    (Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental, and Materials Engineering (DICAM), University of Bologna, 40131 Bologna, Italy)

Abstract

Nowadays, there is a growing interest in integrated sustainable transportation. Bike–train intermodality is one of the sustainable modes of transport, combining long-distance service and reaching the last mile. However, bike–train intermodality development both presents challenges for transport service providers and has its drawbacks for users who prefer connections that do not require changing between transport modes. The challenge consists of providing a better transition during changes between transport modes. This can be accomplished through understanding the needs of travelers followed by the implementation of infrastructural changes and the expansion of targeted services that increase the accessibility of the nodal points. Cost-effectiveness analysis, cost–benefit analysis, and a multicriteria decision process are some of the methods that can be used to allocate resources that could improve bike–train intermodality. This research extended the concept of resource allocation to a new multilevel weighted indicator (AxI) that measured the level of accessibility of bikes into railway stations to identify the criticalities and define the priority of interventions. The proposed method was applied in thirty-three Italian railway stations of different sizes. The results showed that the proposed indicator was a valid tool for railway station infrastructure managers and all stakeholders involved for prioritizing interventions related to the advancement of bike–train intermodality. The AxI indicator is a lean methodology to identify the exigencies and communicate them to the parties involved in the management and actualization. The AxI lays the groundwork for a straightforward discussion on resource distribution priorities.

Suggested Citation

  • Annalisa Zoli & Margherita Pazzini & Valeria Vignali & Hocine Imine & Andrea Simone & Claudio Lantieri, 2025. "Assessing Cyclists’ Accessibility into Railway Stations Through a User-Centered Indicator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:504-:d:1564267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/504/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/504/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Givoni, Moshe & Rietveld, Piet, 2007. "The access journey to the railway station and its role in passengers' satisfaction with rail travel," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(5), pages 357-365, September.
    2. Litman, Todd, 2007. "Evaluating rail transit benefits: A comment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 94-97, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pucher, John & Buehler, Ralph & Seinen, Mark, 2011. "Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 451-475, July.
    2. Lahoorpoor, Bahman & Levinson, David M., 2020. "Catchment if you can: The effect of station entrance and exit locations on accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    3. Kepaptsoglou, Konstantinos & Stathopoulos, Antony & Karlaftis, Matthew G., 2017. "Ridership estimation of a new LRT system: Direct demand model approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 146-156.
    4. Bakker, P. & Koopmans, C. & Nijkamp, P., 2009. "Appraisal of integrated transport policies," Serie Research Memoranda 0052, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    5. Weliwitiya, Hesara & Rose, Geoffrey & Johnson, Marilyn, 2019. "Bicycle train intermodality: Effects of demography, station characteristics and the built environment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 395-404.
    6. Hickman, Robin & Chen, Chia-Lin & Chow, Andy & Saxena, Sharad, 2015. "Improving interchanges in China: the experiential phenomenon," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 175-186.
    7. Roberto Sañudo & Eneko Echaniz & Borja Alonso & Rubén Cordera, 2019. "Addressing the Importance of Service Attributes in Railways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Lissy La Paix & Karst Geurs, 2015. "Scenarios for measuring station-based impedances in a national transport model," ERSA conference papers ersa15p1310, European Regional Science Association.
    9. Moshe Givoni, 2020. "The high‐speed bus (HSB) as an alternative to the high‐speed rail (HSR): A conceptual approach examined through a case study," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 507-518, June.
    10. Mo, Baichuan & Kong, Hui & Wang, Hao & Wang, Xiaokun (Cara) & Li, Ruimin, 2021. "Impact of pricing policy change on on-street parking demand and user satisfaction: A case study in Nanning, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 445-469.
    11. Li, Aoyong & Huang, Yizhe & Axhausen, Kay W., 2020. "An approach to imputing destination activities for inclusion in measures of bicycle accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    12. Nocera, Silvio & Pungillo, Giuseppe & Bruzzone, Francesco, 2021. "How to evaluate and plan the freight-passengers first-last mile," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 56-66.
    13. Duncan, Michael & Christensen, Robert K., 2013. "An analysis of park-and-ride provision at light rail stations across the US," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 148-157.
    14. Milad Mehdizadeh & Alireza Ermagun, 2020. "“I’ll never stop driving my child to school”: on multimodal and monomodal car users," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 1071-1102, June.
    15. Xu, Wangtu & Lin, Weihua, 2016. "Selecting the public transit projects with PCA-DP technique: The example of Xiamen City," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 56-71.
    16. Yi-Wen Kuo & Cheng-Hsien Hsieh & Yu-Chen Hung, 2021. "Non-linear characteristics in switching intention to use a docked bike-sharing system," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1459-1479, June.
    17. Qiao, Yong-Kang & Peng, Fang-Le & Wang, Yang, 2017. "Monetary valuation of urban underground space: A critical issue for the decision-making of urban underground space development," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 12-24.
    18. Pike, Susan & Kothawala, Alimurtaza, 2019. "Informing a Pilot: Preparing the Pre-launch Survey for the Davis Amtrak Station Access Program," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt04p9j3m2, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    19. Jinbao Zhao & Wei Deng & Yan Song & Yueran Zhu, 2014. "Analysis of Metro ridership at station level and station-to-station level in Nanjing: an approach based on direct demand models," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 133-155, January.
    20. Otsuka, Noriko & Wittowsky, Dirk & Damerau, Marlene & Gerten, Christian, 2021. "Walkability assessment for urban areas around railway stations along the Rhine-Alpine Corridor," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:504-:d:1564267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.