IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i2p380-d1561476.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Do ESG Rating Differences Affect Audit Fees?—Dual Intermediary Path Analysis Based on Operating Risk and Analyst Earnings Forecast Error

Author

Listed:
  • Lufeng Gou

    (Business School, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266000, China)

  • Xiaoxiao Li

    (Business School, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266000, China)

Abstract

As environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues become increasingly important, ESG ratings have become a significant factor influencing audit fees for businesses. However, ESG ratings are typically assessed by multiple agencies or rating firms and, due to differences in evaluation criteria, methodologies, and data sources, the ratings provided by different institutions may vary considerably. Therefore, research on the impact of discrepancies in ESG ratings on audit fees is of great significance. This paper examines this phenomenon by analyzing a sample of Chinese listed companies from 2015 to 2022, yielding 3056 observational values through various methodologies. The study employs two-way fixed effects methods. The findings indicate that discrepancies in ESG ratings significantly elevate enterprises’ audit expenses, with operating risk and analyst earnings forecast errors serving as intermediary factors. Additionally, media attention intensifies these effects by increasing corporate disclosure, intensifying regulatory pressure, and heightening reputational risks for the company, and the positive impact of ESG rating discrepancies on audit fees is more significant when the “Big 4” accounting firms are involved in the audit. The research offers insights for enterprises, auditors, and regulatory bodies, contributing to the enhanced implementation of the ESG concept and fostering sustainable enterprise development.

Suggested Citation

  • Lufeng Gou & Xiaoxiao Li, 2025. "Why Do ESG Rating Differences Affect Audit Fees?—Dual Intermediary Path Analysis Based on Operating Risk and Analyst Earnings Forecast Error," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:380-:d:1561476
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/380/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/380/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Li & Zhang, Du & Li, Rongrong, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement and corporate innovation: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    2. Emiel Duuren & Auke Plantinga & Bert Scholtens, 2016. "ESG Integration and the Investment Management Process: Fundamental Investing Reinvented," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 138(3), pages 525-533, October.
    3. Gunther Capelle-Blancard & Aurélien Petit, 2019. "Every Little Helps? ESG News and Stock Market Reaction," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 543-565, June.
    4. Paul C. Tetlock, 2007. "Giving Content to Investor Sentiment: The Role of Media in the Stock Market," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 62(3), pages 1139-1168, June.
    5. Bin Gao & Chunpeng Yang, 2018. "Investor Trading Behavior and Sentiment in Futures Markets," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(3), pages 707-720, February.
    6. Avramov, Doron & Cheng, Si & Lioui, Abraham & Tarelli, Andrea, 2022. "Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 642-664.
    7. Mohammed Benlemlih & Mohammad Bitar, 2018. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Investment Efficiency," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(3), pages 647-671, March.
    8. Aaron K. Chatterji & Rodolphe Durand & David I. Levine & Samuel Touboul, 2016. "Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(8), pages 1597-1614, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zou, Jin & Yan, Jingzhou & Deng, Guoying, 2023. "ESG rating confusion and bond spreads," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    2. Alberto Barroso del Toro & Laura Vivas Crisol & Xavier Tort-Martorell, 2022. "Comparing the Impacts of Sustainability Narratives on American and European Energy Shareholders: A Multi-Event Study Analysing Reactions to News before and during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Carlos A. Piccioni & Saulo B. Bastos & Daniel O. Cajueiro, 2024. "Stock Price Reaction to Environmental, Social, and Governance News: Evidence from Brazil and Financial Materiality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-25, March.
    4. Deli Wang & Ke Peng & Kaiye Tang & Yewei Wu, 2022. "Does Fintech Development Enhance Corporate ESG Performance? Evidence from an Emerging Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Ling, Shixian & Xia, Hui & Liu, Zhangxin (Frank), 2024. "ESG rating divergence and audit fees: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).
    6. Basse, Tobias & Karmani, Majdi & Rjiba, Hatem & Wegener, Christoph, 2023. "Does adhering to the principles of green finance matter for stock valuation? Evidence from testing for (co-)explosiveness," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    7. Ling, Aifan & Li, Junxue & Wen, Limin & Zhang, Yi, 2023. "When trackers are aware of ESG: Do ESG ratings matter to tracking error portfolio performance?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    8. Bauckloh, Tobias & Dobrick, Juris & Höck, André & Utz, Sebastian & Wagner, Marcus, 2024. "In partnership for the goals? The level of agreement between SDG ratings," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 664-678.
    9. Li, Xuepeng & Xu, Fengmin & Jing, Kui, 2022. "Robust enhanced indexation with ESG: An empirical study in the Chinese Stock Market," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    10. Minjuan Wang & Dingsheng Zhang, 2024. "Big Data Infrastructure and Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from Listed Chinese Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, June.
    11. Ann Susan Thomas & Ambili Jayachandran & Ajithakumari Vijayappan Nair Biju, 2024. "Strategic mapping of the environmental social governance landscape in finance – A bibliometric exploration through concepts and themes," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4428-4453, September.
    12. Marzhan Beisenbina & Laura Fabregat‐Aibar & Maria‐Glòria Barberà‐Mariné & Maria‐Teresa Sorrosal‐Forradellas, 2023. "The burgeoning field of sustainable investment: Past, present and future," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 649-667, April.
    13. Liu, Xiangqiang & Yang, Qingqing & Wei, Kai & Dai, Peng-Fei, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement and idiosyncratic return volatility: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PB).
    14. Wang, Jianli & Wang, Shaolin & Dong, Minghua & Wang, Hongxia, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement and stock returns: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    15. Vu, Thanh Nam & Junttila, Juha-Pekka & Lehkonen, Heikki, 2024. "ESG news and long-run stock returns," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    16. Clementino, Ester & Perkins, Richard, 2020. "How do companies respond to environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings? Evidence from Italy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103046, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Jiancheng Shen & Chen Chen & Zheng Liu, 2023. "Does environmental investment pay off?—portfolio analyses of the E in ESG during political conflicts and public health crises," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 46(S1), pages 107-131, December.
    18. Muck, Matthias & Schmidl, Thomas, 2024. "Comparing ESG score weighting approaches and stock performance differentiation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).
    19. Hasmik V. Khachatryan, 2022. "Divergence of ESG Ratings: Foreign Regulatory Trends," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 5, pages 89-104, October.
    20. Liu, Xiangqiang & Dai, Jiajie & Dong, Xiaohong & Liu, Jia, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement and analyst forecast quality," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:380-:d:1561476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.