IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i1p316-d1559924.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decoding Factors to Fishing for Litter: A Game-Changer for Engaging Fishers in Marine Conservation Initiatives

Author

Listed:
  • Chung-Ling Chen

    (Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, Institute of Ocean Technology and Marine Affairs, National Cheng Kung University, 1 University Road, Tainan 701, Taiwan)

  • Xiang-Nong Jian

    (Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, Institute of Ocean Technology and Marine Affairs, National Cheng Kung University, 1 University Road, Tainan 701, Taiwan)

  • Ting-Yu Wang

    (Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, Institute of Ocean Technology and Marine Affairs, National Cheng Kung University, 1 University Road, Tainan 701, Taiwan)

  • Shi-Wei Huang

    (Department of Urban Design and Sustainable Development, Ming Chuan University, No. 5, De Ming Road, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
    Research Division V, Taiwan Institute of Economic Research, 7F., No. 16-8, Dehui St., Taipei 104230, Taiwan)

Abstract

The ubiquitous presence of marine litter has brought huge environmental pressure. A wide range of measures have been developed to address this problem. This paper focuses on the removal measure—Fishing for Litter (FEL). It aims to identify the potential factors affecting fishers’ participation in the FFL program. A two-step approach, including interviews and questionnaire surveys, was employed. A total of 10 fishers participated in the interviews, and 8 factors were initially identified using thematic analysis and utilized in the questionnaire design. A total of 412 valid samples were collected. Descriptive statistics and binary logit regression were used for data analysis. The results showed that rewards, the participation of other friends, and inconveniences or troubles incurred from handling trash feature most in fishers’ decision-making on the participation. Furthermore, fishers’ views toward marine environments also had a behavioral impact on their participation in the program. Potential management measures were proposed, including reducing inconveniences incurred from handling trash on board as well as at ports, providing rewards, encouraging environmental education for fishers, and distributing information regarding the program. It is hoped that fishers will eventually make it a normal onboard practice to collect trash found at sea and develop a sense of marine environmental stewardship.

Suggested Citation

  • Chung-Ling Chen & Xiang-Nong Jian & Ting-Yu Wang & Shi-Wei Huang, 2025. "Decoding Factors to Fishing for Litter: A Game-Changer for Engaging Fishers in Marine Conservation Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:316-:d:1559924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/316/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/316/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Jongmyoung & Hong, Sunwook & Jang, Yong Chang & Lee, Mi Jeong & Kang, Daeseok & Shim, Won Joon, 2015. "Finding solutions for the styrofoam buoy debris problem through participatory workshops," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 182-189.
    2. Zhu, Ling & Zhao, Ya Chao, 2015. "A feasibility assessment of the application of the Polluter-Pays Principle to ship-source pollution in Hong Kong," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 36-44.
    3. Chen, Chung-Ling, 2010. "Factors influencing participation of 'top-down but voluntary' fishery management--Empirical evidence from Taiwan," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 150-155, January.
    4. Liobikienė, Genovaitė & Mandravickaitė, Justina & Bernatonienė, Jurga, 2016. "Theory of planned behavior approach to understand the green purchasing behavior in the EU: A cross-cultural study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 38-46.
    5. Storrier, K.L. & McGlashan, D.J., 2006. "Development and management of a coastal litter campaign: The voluntary coastal partnership approach," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 189-196, March.
    6. Basurko, Oihane C. & Gabiña, Gorka & Andrés, Marga & Rubio, Anna & Uriarte, Ainhize & Krug, Iñigo, 2015. "Fishing for floating marine litter in SE Bay of Biscay: Review and feasibility study," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 103-112.
    7. Robin Grimble & Man‐Kwun Chan, 1995. "Stakeholder analysis for natural resource management in developing countries," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 19(2), pages 113-124, May.
    8. Chung-Ling Chen & Xiang-Nong Jian & Wen-Hao Jiang, 2024. "The Last but Not the Least Piece of Marine Debris Management: Decoding Factors in Consumers’ Intentions to Purchase Recycled Marine Debris Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Chen, Chung-Ling & Liu, Ta-Kang, 2013. "Fill the gap: Developing management strategies to control garbage pollution from fishing vessels," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 34-40.
    10. Lan-Lan Wan & Hong-Youl Ha, 2021. "Sustainable Green Product Adoption Test Using Logistic Regression: Comparison of Glass and Electronic Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chung-Ling Chen & Xiang-Nong Jian & Wen-Hao Jiang, 2024. "The Last but Not the Least Piece of Marine Debris Management: Decoding Factors in Consumers’ Intentions to Purchase Recycled Marine Debris Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Basurko, Oihane C. & Gabiña, Gorka & Andrés, Marga & Rubio, Anna & Uriarte, Ainhize & Krug, Iñigo, 2015. "Fishing for floating marine litter in SE Bay of Biscay: Review and feasibility study," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 103-112.
    3. Maria Carla de Francesco & Maria Laura Carranza & Marco Varricchione & Francesco Pio Tozzi & Angela Stanisci, 2019. "Natural Protected Areas as Special Sentinels of Littering on Coastal Dune Vegetation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Lin Sun & Qixiang Yuan, 2024. "Only the Friendly Face? The Consequences of Consumer Education for Green Consumerism in Remanufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Matteo Migheli, 2021. "Green purchasing: the effect of parenthood and gender," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 10576-10600, July.
    6. Islam Elgammal & Marwa Ghanem & Obaid Al-Modaf, 2024. "Sustainable Purchasing Behaviors in Generation Z: The Role of Social Identity and Behavioral Intentions in the Saudi Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Ching-Min Yang, 2022. "Stakeholders’ Perspectives for Taking Action to Prevent Abandoned, Lost, or Otherwise Discarded Fishing Gear in Gillnet Fisheries, Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Thomas Bausch & Tilman Schröder & Verena Tauber & Bernard Lane, 2021. "Sustainable Tourism: The Elephant in the Room," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    9. Muhammad Yaseen Bhutto & Yasir Ali Soomro & Hailan Yang, 2022. "Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: Predicting Young Consumer Purchase Behavior of Energy-Efficient Appliances (Evidence From Developing Economy)," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, February.
    10. Jana Hojnik & Mitja Ruzzier & Tatiana S. Manolova, 2020. "Sustainable development: Predictors of green consumerism in Slovenia," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1695-1708, July.
    11. Thomas Eichner & Rüdiger Pethig, 2024. "How Important Are IEAs for Mitigation If Countries Are of the Homo Moralis Type?," CESifo Working Paper Series 11040, CESifo.
    12. Meles, Tensay Hadush & Ryan, Lisa & Mukherjee, Sanghamitra C., 2022. "Heterogeneity in preferences for renewable home heating systems among Irish households," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    13. Xie, Jinhua & Yang, Gangqiao & Wang, Ge & Song, Yan & Yang, Fan, 2021. "How do different rural-land-consolidation modes shape farmers’ ecological production behaviors?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    14. Yadav, Rambalak & Pathak, Govind S., 2017. "Determinants of Consumers' Green Purchase Behavior in a Developing Nation: Applying and Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 114-122.
    15. K. Deshika De S. Jayasekara & Darshana Rajapaksa & U. A. D. Prasanthi Gunawardena, 2024. "Impacts of Environmental Knowledge, Motives, and Behavior on Ecotourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-20, June.
    16. Changjoon Lee & Soyoun Lim & Byoungchun Ha, 2021. "Green Supply Chain Management and Its Impact on Consumer Purchase Decision as a Marketing Strategy: Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, October.
    17. Tsang-Yuh Lin & Chung-Ling Chen & Yung-Yen Shih & Hsueh-Han Hsieh & Wei-Ji Huang & Peter H. Santschi & Chin-Chang Hung, 2023. "A Smallholders’ Mariculture Device for Rearing Seafood: Environmentally Friendly and Providing Improved Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, January.
    18. Zaremohzzabieh, Zeinab & Ismail, Normala & Ahrari, Seyedali & Abu Samah, Asnarulkhadi, 2021. "The effects of consumer attitude on green purchase intention: A meta-analytic path analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 732-743.
    19. Nicolae Cristina-Andreea, 2024. "Understanding sustainable purchasing behavior in Romania: Drivers, barriers, and environmental participation," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 19(2), pages 362-381.
    20. Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson & Song, Huaming & Nketiah, Emmanuel & Obuobi, Bright & Adjei, Mavis & Cudjoe, Dan, 2022. "Determinants of adoption intention of battery swap technology for electric vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:316-:d:1559924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.