IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2024i1p41-d1552911.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Application of Machine Learning and Deep Learning with a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Pedestrian Modeling: A Systematic Literature Review (1999–2023)

Author

Listed:
  • Pedro Reyes-Norambuena

    (School of Engineering, Universidad Católica del Norte, Larrondo 1281, Coquimbo 1781421, Chile)

  • Alberto Adrego Pinto

    (DM and LIAAD-INESC TEC, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, s/n, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal)

  • Javier Martínez

    (Department of Applied Mathematics I, Telecommunications Engineering School, University of Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain)

  • Amir Karbassi Yazdi

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial y de Sistemas, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Tarapacá, Arica 1000000, Chile)

  • Yong Tan

    (School of Management, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK)

Abstract

Among transportation researchers, pedestrian issues are highly significant, and various solutions have been proposed to address these challenges. These approaches include Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) and machine learning (ML) techniques, often categorized into two primary types. While previous studies have addressed diverse methods and transportation issues, this research integrates pedestrian modeling with MCDA and ML approaches. This paper examines how MCDA and ML can be combined to enhance decision-making in pedestrian dynamics. Drawing on a review of 1574 papers published from 1999 to 2023, this study identifies prevalent themes and methodologies in MCDA, ML, and pedestrian modeling. The MCDA methods are categorized into weighting and ranking techniques, with an emphasis on their application to complex transportation challenges involving both qualitative and quantitative criteria. The findings suggest that hybrid MCDA algorithms can effectively evaluate ML performance, addressing the limitations of traditional methods. By synthesizing the insights from the existing literature, this review outlines key methodologies and provides a roadmap for future research in integrating MCDA and ML in pedestrian dynamics. This research aims to deepen the understanding of how informed decision-making can enhance urban environments and improve pedestrian safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedro Reyes-Norambuena & Alberto Adrego Pinto & Javier Martínez & Amir Karbassi Yazdi & Yong Tan, 2024. "The Application of Machine Learning and Deep Learning with a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Pedestrian Modeling: A Systematic Literature Review (1999–2023)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-27, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:41-:d:1552911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/41/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/41/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas Molyneaux & Riccardo Scarinci & Michel Bierlaire, 2021. "Design and analysis of control strategies for pedestrian flows," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1767-1807, August.
    2. Laura Eboli & Carmen Forciniti & Gabriella Mazzulla & Maria Grazia Bellizzi, 2023. "Establishing Performance Criteria for Evaluating Pedestrian Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Kannan Govindan & Jurgita Antucheviciene & Zenonas Turskis, 2016. "Hybrid multiple criteria decision-making methods: a review of applications for sustainability issues," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 857-887, January.
    4. Dorota Burchart & Iga Przytuła, 2024. "Sustainability Assessment Methods for the Transport Sector Considering the Life Cycle Concept—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-19, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natalia Distefano & Salvatore Leonardi & Nilda Georgina Liotta, 2023. "Walking for Sustainable Cities: Factors Affecting Users’ Willingness to Walk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec & Jacek Pacana, 2023. "Fuzzy Method to Improve Products and Processes Considering the Approach of Sustainable Development (FQE-SD Method)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Zhang, Zhao & Fei, Yuhan & Fu, Daocheng, 2024. "A deep reinforcement learning traffic control model for Pedestrian and vehicle evacuation in the parking lot," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 646(C).
    4. He, Mengchen & Wang, Qiao & Chen, Juan & Xu, Shiwei & Ma, Jian, 2023. "Modeling pedestrian walking behavior in the flow field with moving walkways," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 619(C).
    5. Guangzhong Hu & Yuming Liu & Kai Liu & Xiaoxu Yang, 2023. "Research on Data-Driven Dynamic Decision-Making Mechanism of Mega Infrastructure Project Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-25, June.
    6. Pawel Gromek & Monika Wojakowska, 2021. "To Manage Societal Security in COVID-19: Operational Continuity of Fire Rescue Service in Disaster Conditions," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3 - Part ), pages 833-850.
    7. Liu, Xianliang & Liu, Yunfei, 2024. "Sensitivity analysis of the parameters for preference functions and rank reversal analysis in the PROMETHEE II method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    8. Xiangqian Feng & Eryang Li & Jian Li & Cuiping Wei, 2024. "Critical influencing factors of employees’ green behavior: three-stage hybrid fuzzy DEMATEL–ISM–MICMAC approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 17783-17811, July.
    9. Kalyana C. Chejarla & Omkarprasad S. Vaidya, 2024. "A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach for longitudinal data," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 61(3), pages 1013-1060, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:41-:d:1552911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.