IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i9p3530-d1381204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Placement of Sensors in Traffic Networks Using Global Search Optimization Techniques Oriented towards Traffic Flow Estimation and Pollutant Emission Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Gianfranco Gagliardi

    (Dipartimento di Ingegneria Informatica, Modellistica, Elettronica e Sistemistica, Università della Calabria, Via P. Bucci, 87036 Arcavacata, Italy)

  • Vincenzo Gallelli

    (Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Università della Calabria, Via P. Bucci, 87036 Arcavacata, Italy)

  • Antonio Violi

    (Dipartimento di Diritto, Economia, Management e Metodi Quantitativi, Università degli Studi del Sannio di Benevento-Piazza Guerrazzi, 82100 Benevento, Italy)

  • Marco Lupia

    (Dipartimento di Ingegneria Informatica, Modellistica, Elettronica e Sistemistica, Università della Calabria, Via P. Bucci, 87036 Arcavacata, Italy)

  • Gianni Cario

    (Dipartimento di Ingegneria Informatica, Modellistica, Elettronica e Sistemistica, Università della Calabria, Via P. Bucci, 87036 Arcavacata, Italy)

Abstract

The relationship between estimating traffic flow and evaluating pollutant emissions lies in understanding how vehicular traffic patterns affect air quality. Traffic flow estimation is a complex field that involves a variety of analytical techniques to understand, predict, and manage the flow of vehicles on road networks. Different types of analyses commonly employed in this area are statistical analysis (e.g., descriptive statistics, inferential statistics, time series analysis), mathematical modeling (macroscopic models, microscopic models, mesoscopic models), computational methods (e.g., simulation modeling, machine learning, and AI techniques), geospatial analysis (e.g., geographic information systems (GISs), spatial data analysis), network analysis (e.g., graph theory and network flow models). In sensor network setups, the strategic placement of sensors is crucial, primarily due to the challenges posed by limited energy supplies, restricted storage capabilities, and the demands on processing and communication, all of which significantly impact maintenance costs and hardware limitations. To mitigate the burden on processing and communication, it is essential to deploy a limited number of sensors strategically. In practical applications, achieving an optimal layout of physical sensors (i.e., placing sensors within the network in such a way as to meet a specific optimality criterion, such as identifying the minimum number of sensors required to ensure the ability to design reliable state observers capable of reconstructing the network’s state based on the available data) is essential for the accurate monitoring of large-scale systems, including traffic flow or the distribution networks of water and gas. In the context of traffic systems, addressing the challenge of full link flow observability, that is, the ability to accurately monitor and assess the flow of entities (i.e., vehicles) across all the links or pathways within a network, entails selecting the smallest number of traffic sensors from a larger set to install. The goal is to choose a subset of p sensors, which may include redundancies, from a pool of n > > p potential sensors. This is conducted to maintain the structural observability of the entire traffic network. This concept pertains to deducing the complete internal state (traffic volume on each road link in the network) from external outputs and inputs (measurements from sensors). The traditional concept of system observability serves as a criterion for sensor placement. This article presents the development of a simulated annealing heuristic to address the selection problem. The selected sensors are then applied to construct a Luenberger observer, a mathematical construct used in control theory to accurately estimate the internal state of a dynamic system based on its inputs and outputs. Numerical simulations are carried out to demonstrate the effectiveness of this method, and a performance analysis using a digital twin of a transport network, designed using the Aimsun Next software, are also carried out to assess traffic flow and associated pollutant emissions. In particular, we examine a traffic network comprising 21 roads. We address the sensor selection problem by identifying an optimal set of six sensors, which facilitates the design of a Luenberger observer. This observer enables the reconstruction of traffic flow across the network with minimal estimation error. Furthermore, by integrating this observer with data from the Aimsun Next software, we assess the pollutant emissions related to traffic flow. The results indicate a high accuracy in estimating pollutant levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Gianfranco Gagliardi & Vincenzo Gallelli & Antonio Violi & Marco Lupia & Gianni Cario, 2024. "Optimal Placement of Sensors in Traffic Networks Using Global Search Optimization Techniques Oriented towards Traffic Flow Estimation and Pollutant Emission Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-23, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3530-:d:1381204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3530/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3530/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. L. Ingber, 1996. "Adaptive simulated annealing (ASA): Lessons learned," Lester Ingber Papers 96as, Lester Ingber.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Minford, Patrick & Ou, Zhirong, 2013. "Taylor Rule or optimal timeless policy? Reconsidering the Fed's behavior since 1982," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 113-123.
    2. Vo Le & Kent Matthews & David Meenagh & Patrick Minford & Zhiguo Xiao, 2014. "Banking and the Macroeconomy in China: A Banking Crisis Deferred?," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 123-161, February.
    3. Ye, Hong & Lin, Zhiping, 2006. "Speed-up simulated annealing by parallel coordinates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(1), pages 59-71, August.
    4. Liu, Chunping & Minford, Patrick, 2014. "Comparing behavioural and rational expectations for the US post-war economy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 407-415.
    5. Fan, Jingwen & Minford, Patrick & Ou, Zhirong, 2013. "The Fiscal Theory of the Price Level - identification and testing for the UK in the 1970s," Cardiff Economics Working Papers E2013/12, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section.
    6. Luo, Zhongyang & Sultan, Umair & Ni, Mingjiang & Peng, Hao & Shi, Bingwei & Xiao, Gang, 2016. "Multi-objective optimization for GPU3 Stirling engine by combining multi-objective algorithms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 114-125.
    7. Nasir Aminu, 2018. "Evaluation of a DSGE Model of Energy in the United Kingdom Using Stationary Data," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 51(4), pages 1033-1068, April.
    8. Minford, Patrick & Meenagh, David & Le, Vo Phuong Mai, 2012. "What causes banking crises? An empirical investigation," CEPR Discussion Papers 9057, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. Li Dai & Patrick Minford & Peng Zhou, 2015. "A DSGE model of China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(59), pages 6438-6460, December.
    10. Alfeus, Mesias & Grasselli, Martino & Schlögl, Erik, 2020. "A consistent stochastic model of the term structure of interest rates for multiple tenors," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    11. repec:uts:finphd:41 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Fan, Jingwen & Minford, Patrick & Ou, Zhirong, 2016. "The role of fiscal policy in Britain's Great Inflation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 203-218.
    13. Ingber, Lester, 2000. "High-resolution path-integral development of financial options," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 529-558.
    14. Graeme J. Doole & David J. Pannell, 2008. "Optimisation of a Large, Constrained Simulation Model using Compressed Annealing," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 188-206, February.
    15. Lehmann, Sebastian & Huth, Andreas, 2015. "Fast calibration of a dynamic vegetation model with minimum observation data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 301(C), pages 98-105.
    16. Le, Vo Phuong Mai & Meenagh, David & Minford, Patrick & Wickens, Michael, 2011. "How much nominal rigidity is there in the US economy? Testing a new Keynesian DSGE model using indirect inference," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 2078-2104.
    17. Liu, Chunping & Minford, Patrick, 2014. "How important is the credit channel? An empirical study of the US banking crisis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 119-134.
    18. Aminu, Nasir & Meenagh, David & Minford, Patrick, 2018. "The role of energy prices in the Great Recession — A two-sector model with unfiltered data," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 14-34.
    19. Efrat Taig & Ohad Ben-Shahar, 2019. "Gradient Surfing: A New Deterministic Approach for Low-Dimensional Global Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 180(3), pages 855-878, March.
    20. Pedamallu, Chandra Sekhar & Ozdamar, Linet, 2008. "Investigating a hybrid simulated annealing and local search algorithm for constrained optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(3), pages 1230-1245, March.
    21. Le, Vo Phuong Mai & Meenagh, David & Minford, Patrick, 2016. "Monetarism rides again? US monetary policy in a world of Quantitative Easing," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 85-102.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3530-:d:1381204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.