IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i8p3469-d1379906.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Biodiversity Monitoring Case Study in Viticulture: Manual and Digitalized Collaborative Methodology to Pursue the European Commission’s Sustainable Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Sofia Matilde Luglio

    (Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, 56124 Pisa, Italy)

  • Ginevra Bucalossi

    (Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence, Piazzale delle Cascine 15, 50144 Florence, Italy)

  • Riccardo Lisci

    (Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence, Piazzale delle Cascine 15, 50144 Florence, Italy)

  • Christian Frasconi

    (Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, 56124 Pisa, Italy)

  • Stefania Lombardo

    (Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence, Piazzale delle Cascine 15, 50144 Florence, Italy)

  • Marco Vieri

    (Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence, Piazzale delle Cascine 15, 50144 Florence, Italy)

  • Andrea Pagliai

    (Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence, Piazzale delle Cascine 15, 50144 Florence, Italy)

  • Daniele Sarri

    (Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence, Piazzale delle Cascine 15, 50144 Florence, Italy)

Abstract

The European Commission (EC) promotes policies addressing the needs of a growing human population while adhering to ecological principles that ensure ecosystem sustainability. Viticulture, one of the most widespread cultivations in the world, is, at the same time, one of the most environmentally impactful cultivations. Many studies have been conducted worldwide to identify more sustainable practices because vine monoculture, when repeated for long periods in the same territory, combined with low attention to the agronomic balance of vineyards, is causing biodiversity loss. The study aims to implement analytics for the accounting of biodiversity supported by digital tools like smart applications and digital platforms. Two farms were analyzed in a vacated area for red wine production in the center of Tuscany (Italy). A conventional biodiversity assessment protocol was used to evaluate the magnitude of biodiversity. Smartphone applications and a digital database creation platform supported this. The results highlighted an overall low level of biodiversity from a biodiversity perspective, while the use of smart applications and digital platforms represents an efficient tool for mitigating recognition errors in flora and fauna assessments and a powerful instrument for monitoring and tracking farm biodiversity. The study provides an overview of biodiversity status in a wine production area and a methodology to make its assessment easier and more reliable.

Suggested Citation

  • Sofia Matilde Luglio & Ginevra Bucalossi & Riccardo Lisci & Christian Frasconi & Stefania Lombardo & Marco Vieri & Andrea Pagliai & Daniele Sarri, 2024. "A Biodiversity Monitoring Case Study in Viticulture: Manual and Digitalized Collaborative Methodology to Pursue the European Commission’s Sustainable Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3469-:d:1379906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3469/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3469/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mieczysław Adamowicz, 2022. "Green Deal, Green Growth and Green Economy as a Means of Support for Attaining the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-32, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Shen & Xiuwu Zhang, 2022. "Study on the Impact of Environmental Tax on Industrial Green Transformation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Xiang-Fei Ma & Ru Zhang & Yi-Fan Ruan, 2023. "How to Evaluate the Level of Green Development Based on Entropy Weight TOPSIS: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Navid Khan & Ke Xing & Salman Mahmood & Riaz Ahmad, 2024. "Key underlying concepts of shared prosperity: insights from a literature review," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 71(3), pages 727-751, September.
    4. Nino Stameski & Magdalena Radulescu & Vera Zelenović & Vera Mirović & Branimir Kalaš & Nataša Pavlović, 2024. "Investigating the Effects of Environmental Tax Revenues on Economic Development: The Case of Nordic Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Chao Wang & Shushan Zhang & Xiue Zhang, 2022. "How to Embrace Sustainable Performance via Green Learning Orientation: A Moderated Mediating Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    6. Rita Lankauskienė & Živilė Gedminaitė-Raudonė, 2023. "Toward Holistic Perceptions of “Smart” Growth in Development Paradigms and Policy Agendas," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    7. Guoteng Xu & Shuai Peng & Chengjiang Li & Xia Chen, 2023. "Synergistic Evolution of China’s Green Economy and Digital Economy Based on LSTM-GM and Grey Absolute Correlation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-29, September.
    8. Ana Clara Borrego & Rute Abreu & Francisco Alegria Carreira & Filipe Caetano & Ana Lúcia Vasconcelos, 2023. "Environmental Taxation on the Agri-Food Sector and the Farm to Fork Strategy: The Portuguese Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Oleg Rybalkin & Olga Lavrinenko & Alina Danileviča & Wiesława Lizińska, 2023. "Sustainable Development Green Index: measuring progress towards sustainable development goals in the European Union," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 10(4), pages 279-292, June.
    10. Gabriela Alina Anghel & Mihai Alin Anghel, 2022. "Green Entrepreneurship among Students—Social and Behavioral Motivation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    11. Joanna Wyrwa & Ireneusz Jaźwiński, 2024. "The Green Economy in the Energy Transformation Process—Comparative Analysis of the European Union Member States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-29, October.
    12. Dinah Quacoe & Yusheng Kong & Daniel Quacoe, 2023. "Analysis of How Green Growth and Entrepreneurship Affect Sustainable Development: Application of the Quintuple Helix Innovation Model in the African Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Aleksy Kwilinski & Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko, 2023. "Greenfield Investment as a Catalyst of Green Economic Growth," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Aleksy Kwilinski & Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko, 2023. "The Effects of Urbanisation on Green Growth within Sustainable Development Goals," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, February.
    15. Sulehri, Fiaz Ahmad & Ali, Amjad, 2024. "Country Risk and Sustainable Development: Mediating Role of Economic Growth," MPRA Paper 121290, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Tingyang Huang & Haoyu Wang & Fang Liu, 2024. "Do Forestry Innovation Ecosystems Contribute to the Green Economy?—Based on SBM-GML and Two-Way Fixed Effect Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-22, October.
    17. Roman Rudnicki & Mirosław Biczkowski & Łukasz Wiśniewski & Paweł Wiśniewski & Stanisław Bielski & Renata Marks-Bielska, 2023. "Towards Green Agriculture and Sustainable Development: Pro-Environmental Activity of Farms under the Common Agricultural Policy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-23, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3469-:d:1379906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.