IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i3p1011-d1577692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green Growth in Agriculture: Long-Term Evidence from European Union Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Vlada Vitunskienė

    (Faculty of Bioeconomy Development, Vytautas Magnus University, K. Donelaičio Str. 58, 44248 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Lina Lauraitienė

    (Faculty of Bioeconomy Development, Vytautas Magnus University, K. Donelaičio Str. 58, 44248 Kaunas, Lithuania)

Abstract

In agriculture, the relationship between economic growth and environmental pressures is complex and difficult to measure and compare between countries. This study had two objectives; the first was to build a new green growth accounting framework for agriculture in relation to natural capital and air pollution, and the second was to assess the long-term green growth of agriculture in EU countries. The data for EU27 from 2005 to 2021 were collected and used in the empirical analysis of green growth in agriculture. The findings showed positive real growth in agriculture from both the economic growth and green growth perspectives in most EU countries in the long term. Slow changes in air pollution (expressed in net GHG emissions from agriculture) and in natural capital (expressed in quality-adjusted agricultural land) did not have a significant impact on green growth in agriculture. The empirical analysis also revealed that most EU countries increasingly rely on technological progress to promote agricultural growth, and half of them rely on investments in produced capital. Labour input only made a positive contribution to agricultural growth in Ireland and Malta. This study will significantly contribute to improving the measure of green growth in agriculture, and the results of the empirical analysis will be used by policymakers and economists.

Suggested Citation

  • Vlada Vitunskienė & Lina Lauraitienė, 2025. "Green Growth in Agriculture: Long-Term Evidence from European Union Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-24, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1011-:d:1577692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1011/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1011/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vander Donckt, Marie & Chan, Philip & Silvestrini, Andrea, 2021. "A new global database on agriculture investment and capital stock," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    2. Haoyue Wu & Hanjiao Huang & Jin Tang & Wenkuan Chen & Yanqiu He, 2019. "Net Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agriculture in China: Estimation, Spatial Correlation and Convergence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Meyer-Aurich, Andreas & Weersink, Alfons & Janovicek, Ken & Deen, Bill, 2006. "Cost Efficient Tillage and Rotation Options for Mitigating GHG Emissions from Agriculture in Eastern Canada," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25485, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Xiaofei Lv & Xiaoli Lu & Guo Fu & Chunyou Wu, 2018. "A Spatial-Temporal Approach to Evaluate the Dynamic Evolution of Green Growth in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    5. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Roberto Ganau, 2022. "Institutions and the productivity challenge for European regions," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 1-25.
    6. Georg Zachmann, 2016. "An approach to identify the sources of low-carbon growth for Europe," Bruegel Policy Contributions 16645, Bruegel.
    7. Armand Kasztelan & Anna Nowak & Joanna Hawlena, 2019. "Green Growth in Agriculture in the European Union: Myth or Reality?," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 35-48.
    8. Cason, Timothy N. & Gangadharan, Lata & Duke, Charlotte, 2003. "A laboratory study of auctions for reducing non-point source pollution," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 446-471, November.
    9. Armand Kasztelan, 2017. "Green Growth, Green Economy and Sustainable Development: Terminological and Relational Discourse," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(4), pages 487-499.
    10. Mieczysław Adamowicz, 2022. "Green Deal, Green Growth and Green Economy as a Means of Support for Attaining the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-32, May.
    11. Verena Seufert & Navin Ramankutty & Jonathan A. Foley, 2012. "Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture," Nature, Nature, vol. 485(7397), pages 229-232, May.
    12. Capasso, Marco & Hansen, Teis & Heiberg, Jonas & Klitkou, Antje & Steen, Markus, 2019. "Green growth – A synthesis of scientific findings," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 390-402.
    13. Hiroyuki Hasukawa & Yumi Inoda & Satoshi Toritsuka & Shigeto Sudo & Noriko Oura & Tomohito Sano & Yasuhito Shirato & Junta Yanai, 2021. "Effect of Paddy-Upland Rotation System on the Net Greenhouse Gas Balance as the Sum of Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions and Soil Carbon Storage: A Case in Western Japan," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    14. Hamilton,Kirk E. & Naikal,Esther G. & Lange,Glenn-Marie, 2019. "Natural Resources and Total Factor Productivity Growth in Developing Countries : Testing A New Methodology," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8704, The World Bank.
    15. Cárdenas Rodríguez, Miguel & Haščič, Ivan & Souchier, Martin, 2018. "Environmentally Adjusted Multifactor Productivity: Methodology and Empirical Results for OECD and G20 Countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 147-160.
    16. Matthew Agarwala & Josh Martin, 2022. "Environmentally-adjusted productivity measures for the UK," Working Papers 028, The Productivity Institute.
    17. Edward B Barbier, 2019. "The concept of natural capital," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 35(1), pages 14-36.
    18. Kao, Chiang & Hwang, Shiuh-Nan, 2021. "Measuring the effects of undesirable outputs on the efficiency of production units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 996-1003.
    19. Chen, Po-Chi & Yu, Ming-Miin & Chang, Ching-Cheng & Hsu, Shih-Hsun, 2008. "Total factor productivity growth in China's agricultural sector," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 580-593, December.
    20. Dakpo, K Hervé & Lansink, Alfons Oude, 2019. "Dynamic pollution-adjusted inefficiency under the by-production of bad outputs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 202-211.
    21. Ren, Xiaocong & He, Jun & Huang, Zilong, 2023. "Innovation, natural resources abundance, climate change and green growth in agriculture," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    22. Stelian Brad & Bogdan Mocan & Emilia Brad & Mircea Fulea, 2016. "Environmentally Sustainable Economic Growth," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(42), pages 446-446, May.
    23. Andrea Schapper & Clemens Hoffmann & Phyllis Lee, 2022. "Procedural rights for nature – a pathway to sustainable decarbonisation?," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 1197-1216, May.
    24. Alex Bowen & Cameron Hepburn, 2014. "Green growth: an assessment," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 30(3), pages 407-422.
    25. Miklós Antal & Jeroen C.J.M. Van Den Bergh, 2016. "Green growth and climate change: conceptual and empirical considerations," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 165-177, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Armand Kasztelan, 2020. "Towards Green Growth: A Taxonomic Analysis Based on the Headline Indicators," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 749-759.
    2. Pervin Ersoy & Gülmüş Börühan & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Jorge Hernandez Hormazabal & Yigit Kazancoglu & Çisem Lafcı, 2022. "Impact of information technology and knowledge sharing on circular food supply chains for green business growth," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1875-1904, July.
    3. Armand Kasztelan & Anna Nowak & Joanna Hawlena, 2019. "Green Growth in Agriculture in the European Union: Myth or Reality?," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 35-48.
    4. Efi Drimili & Ζoi Gareiou & Efthimios Zervas, 2020. "Public perceptions of the concept of green growth: application in Athens, Greece, during a period of economic crisis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(7), pages 6053-6076, October.
    5. Bai, Ge & Shen, Zhiyang & Šermukšnytė-Alešiūnienė, Kristina & Štreimikienė, Dalia & Li, Tianxiang, 2024. "Energy structure and green productivity dynamics: Investigation from OECD Countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    6. Pang, Dezhi & Jin, Xin & Zheng, Kengcheng & Tien, Nguyen Hoang, 2024. "A road toward green growth: Optimizing the role of mineral resources, fintech innovation and effective governance in G-20 economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Katarzyna Cheba & Iwona Bąk, 2021. "Environmental Production Efficiency in the European Union Countries as a Tool for the Implementation of Goal 7 of the 2030 Agenda," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Cristina I. Fernandes & Pedro Mota Veiga & João J.M. Ferreira & Mathew Hughes, 2021. "Green growth versus economic growth: Do sustainable technology transfer and innovations lead to an imperfect choice?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 2021-2037, May.
    9. Shen, Zhiyang & Bai, Kaixuan & Hong, Tianyang & Balezentis, Tomas, 2021. "Evaluation of carbon shadow price within a non-parametric meta-frontier framework: The case of OECD, ASEAN and BRICS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    10. Beata Gavurova & Silvia Megyesiova & Matej Hudak, 2021. "Green Growth in the OECD Countries: A Multivariate Analytical Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    11. Xu, Xiaoying, 2022. "The impact of natural resources on green growth: The role of green trade," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    12. Marinus Ossewaarde & Roshnee Ossewaarde-Lowtoo, 2020. "The EU’s Green Deal: A Third Alternative to Green Growth and Degrowth?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-15, November.
    13. Czajkowski, Mikołaj & Zagórska, Katarzyna & Letki, Natalia & Tryjanowski, Piotr & Wąs, Adam, 2021. "Drivers of farmers’ willingness to adopt extensive farming practices in a globally important bird area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    14. Frans P. Vries & Nick Hanley, 2016. "Incentive-Based Policy Design for Pollution Control and Biodiversity Conservation: A Review," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 63(4), pages 687-702, April.
    15. Jonathan Muringani & Rune Dahl Fitjar & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2024. "Political trust and economic development in European regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 73(4), pages 2059-2089, December.
    16. Bui Huy Nhuong & Ho Dinh Bao & Le Thanh Ha, 2024. "Embracing Green Foreign Direct Investment in a Journey toward Global Sustainable Economy: An Empirical Approach Using Statistical Analysis," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(5), pages 435-446, September.
    17. Ana Filipa Fonseca & Fabíola Polita & Lívia Madureira, 2024. "How Agroecological Transition Frameworks Are Reshaping Agroecology: A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, November.
    18. Jie Zhao & Ji Chen & Damien Beillouin & Hans Lambers & Yadong Yang & Pete Smith & Zhaohai Zeng & Jørgen E. Olesen & Huadong Zang, 2022. "Global systematic review with meta-analysis reveals yield advantage of legume-based rotations and its drivers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    19. Yeray Hernandez & Gustavo Naumann & Serafin Corral & Paulo Barbosa, 2020. "Water Footprint Expands with Gross Domestic Product," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-6, October.
    20. Movedi, Ermes & Valiante, Daniele & Colosio, Alessandro & Corengia, Luca & Cossa, Stefano & Confalonieri, Roberto, 2022. "A new approach for modeling crop-weed interaction targeting management support in operational contexts: A case study on the rice weeds barnyardgrass and red rice," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 463(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1011-:d:1577692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.