IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i6p2427-d1357234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Fuel Cell vs. Battery Electric Trucks: Economic Perspectives in Alignment with China’s Carbon Neutrality Target

Author

Listed:
  • Zhexuan Mu

    (State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    Tsinghua Automotive Strategy Research Institute, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Fuquan Zhao

    (State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    Tsinghua Automotive Strategy Research Institute, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Fanlong Bai

    (State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    Tsinghua Automotive Strategy Research Institute, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Zongwei Liu

    (State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    Tsinghua Automotive Strategy Research Institute, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Han Hao

    (State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    Tsinghua Automotive Strategy Research Institute, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

Abstract

The electrification of heavy-duty trucks stands as a critical and challenging cornerstone in the low-carbon transition of the transportation sector. This paper employs the total cost of ownership (TCO) as the economic evaluation metric, framed within the context of China’s ambitious goals for heavy truck electrification by 2035. A detailed TCO model is developed, encompassing not only the vehicles but also their related energy replenishing infrastructures. This comprehensive approach enables a sophisticated examination of the economic feasibility for different deployment contexts of both fuel cell and battery electric heavy-duty trucks, emphasizing renewable energy utilization. This study demonstrates that in the context where both fuel cell components and hydrogen energy are costly, fuel cell trucks (FCTs) exhibit a significantly higher TCO compared to battery electric trucks (BETs). Specifically, for a 16 ton truck with a 500 km range, the TCO for the FCT is 0.034 USD/tkm, representing a 122% increase over its BET counterpart. In the case of a 49 ton truck designed for a 1000 km range, the TCO for the FCT is 0.024 USD/tkm, marking a 36% premium compared to the BET model. The technological roadmap suggests a narrowing cost disparity between FCTs and BETs by 2035. For the aforementioned 16 ton truck model, the projected TCO for the FCT is expected to be 0.016 USD/tkm, which is 58% above the BET, and for the 49 ton variant, it is anticipated at 0.012 USD per ton-kilometer, narrowing the difference to just 4.5% relative to BET. Further analysis within this study on the influences of renewable energy pricing and operational range on FCT and BET costs highlights a pivotal finding: for the 49 ton truck, achieving TCO parity between FCTs and BETs is feasible when renewable energy electricity prices fall to 0.022 USD/kWh or when the operational range extends to 1890 km. This underscores the critical role of energy costs and efficiency in bridging the cost gap between FCTs and BETs.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhexuan Mu & Fuquan Zhao & Fanlong Bai & Zongwei Liu & Han Hao, 2024. "Evaluating Fuel Cell vs. Battery Electric Trucks: Economic Perspectives in Alignment with China’s Carbon Neutrality Target," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-22, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2427-:d:1357234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2427/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2427/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Burke, Andrew & Sinha, Anish Kumar, 2020. "Technology, Sustainability, and Marketing of Battery Electric and Hydrogen Fuel Cell Medium-Duty and Heavy-Duty Trucks and Buses in 2020-2040," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt7s25d8bc, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    2. Wang, Guihua & Miller, Marshall & Fulton, Lewis, 2022. "Estimating Maintenance and Repair Costs for Battery Electric and Fuel Cell Heavy Duty Trucks," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt36c08395, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kathrin Walz & Krzysztof Rudion, 2024. "Charging Profile Modeling of Electric Trucks at Logistics Centers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-19, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hensher, David A. & Wei, Edward, 2024. "Energy and environmental costs in transitioning to zero and low emission trucks for the Australian truck Fleet: An industry perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    2. Romeo Danielis & Mariangela Scorrano & Manuela Masutti & Asees Muhammad Awan & Arsalan Muhammad Khan Niazi, 2024. "The Economic Competitiveness of Hydrogen Fuel Cell-Powered Trucks: A Review of Total Cost of Ownership Estimates," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Levent Özlü & Dilay Çelebi, 2024. "Electrifying Freight: Modeling the Decision-Making Process for Battery Electric Truck Procurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Carlo Cunanan & Manh-Kien Tran & Youngwoo Lee & Shinghei Kwok & Vincent Leung & Michael Fowler, 2021. "A Review of Heavy-Duty Vehicle Powertrain Technologies: Diesel Engine Vehicles, Battery Electric Vehicles, and Hydrogen Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Mingyue Hu & Xiao Wu & Yue Yuan & Chuanbo Xu, 2024. "Competitive Analysis of Heavy Trucks with Five Types of Fuels under Different Scenarios—A Case Study of China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Burke, Andrew & Zhao, Jingyuan & Miller, Marshall & Fulton, Lewis, 2023. "Vehicle Choice Modeling for Light-, Medium-, and Heavy-Duty Zero-Emission Vehicles in California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt7437p058, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    7. Jahangir Samet, Mehdi & Liimatainen, Heikki & Pihlatie, Mikko & van Vliet, Oscar Patrick René, 2024. "Levelized cost of driving for medium and heavy-duty battery electric trucks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 361(C).
    8. Giuseppe Aiello & Salvatore Quaranta & Rosalinda Inguanta & Antonella Certa & Mario Venticinque, 2024. "A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework for Zero Emission Vehicle Fleet Renewal Considering Lifecycle and Scenario Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Vishnu Vijayakumar & Alan Jenn & Lewis Fulton, 2021. "Low Carbon Scenario Analysis of a Hydrogen-Based Energy Transition for On-Road Transportation in California," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, November.
    10. Zhu, Min & Dong, Peiwu & Ju, Yanbing & Li, Jiajun & Ran, Lun, 2023. "Effects of government subsidies on heavy-duty hydrogen fuel cell truck penetration: A scenario-based system dynamics model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2427-:d:1357234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.