IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i5p1904-d1346117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Heavy-Duty Trucking in a Non-Containerized Port through Simulation-Based Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Afef Lagha

    (Department of Management, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC G8Z 4M3, Canada)

  • Bechir Ben Daya

    (Department of Management, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC G8Z 4M3, Canada)

  • Jean-François Audy

    (Department of Management, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC G8Z 4M3, Canada
    Interuniversity Research Center on Enterprise Network, Logistics and Transportation (CIRRELT), Montreal, QC H3T IJ4, Canada)

Abstract

Seaports are perceived as multimodal hubs of the logistics supply chain where various transport modes intersect to exchange goods shipped by vessels. Increasing trade and capacity constraints are making this area a major contributor to GHG emissions. National and regional decision-makers perceive port sustainability as a concern while planning GHG mitigation projects. However, to plan and conduct successful GHG management programs, it is critical to first develop an appropriate assessment approach that fits well with the operating and geographical context of the given port. For heavy-duty trucking activities taking place within such ports, several models and methodologies for assessing GHG emissions are available, but their generalization is challenging for many reasons, notably because of the specific features of traffic within the port. Therefore, this paper presents an assessment model for heavy-duty trucking emissions within a non-containerized port based on an in-depth study of the traffic per port zone and on parameters drawn from several real data sources. The GHG model based on road traffic profiles by zone is implemented in a simulation model for emission evaluation and prediction. The output shows the pattern of GHG emissions by zone and provides an outlook on how decision-makers could achieve a GHG reduction plan.

Suggested Citation

  • Afef Lagha & Bechir Ben Daya & Jean-François Audy, 2024. "Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Heavy-Duty Trucking in a Non-Containerized Port through Simulation-Based Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-27, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1904-:d:1346117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1904/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1904/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Torkjazi, Mohammad & Huynh, Nathan & Shiri, Samaneh, 2018. "Truck appointment systems considering impact to drayage truck tours," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 208-228.
    2. Chen, Gang & Govindan, Kannan & Golias, Mihalis M., 2013. "Reducing truck emissions at container terminals in a low carbon economy: Proposal of a queueing-based bi-objective model for optimizing truck arrival pattern," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 3-22.
    3. Branislav Dragović & Ernestos Tzannatos & Nam Kuy Park, 2017. "Simulation modelling in ports and container terminals: literature overview and analysis by research field, application area and tool," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 4-34, March.
    4. Florin RUSCĂ & Mihaela POPA & Eugen ROȘCA & Mircea ROȘCA & Aura RUSCĂ, 2018. "Simulation Model For Maritime Container Terminal," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 13(4), pages 47-54, December.
    5. Sanghyuk Yi & Bernd Scholz-Reiter & Taehoon Kim & Kap Hwan Kim, 2019. "Scheduling appointments for container truck arrivals considering their effects on congestion," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 730-762, September.
    6. Leonard Heilig & Stefan Voß, 2017. "Inter-terminal transportation: an annotated bibliography and research agenda," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 35-63, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lange, Ann-Kathrin & Nellen, Nicole & Jahn, Carlos, 2022. "Truck appointment systems: How can they be improved and what are their limits?," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Jahn, Carlos & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Changing Tides: The New Role of Resilience and Sustainability in Logistics and Supply Chain Management – Innovative Approaches for the Shift to a New , volume 33, pages 615-655, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    2. Lange, Ann-Kathrin & Kreuz, Felix & Langkau, Sven & Jahn, Carlos & Clausen, Uwe, 2020. "Defining the quota of truck appointment systems," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Data Science in Maritime and City Logistics: Data-driven Solutions for Logistics and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conferen, volume 30, pages 211-246, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    3. Li, Dongjun & Dong, Jing-Xin & Song, Dong-Ping & Hicks, Christian & Singh, Surya Prakash, 2020. "Optimal contract design for the exchange of tradable truck permits at multiterminal ports," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    4. Mohammad Torkjazi & Nathan Huynh & Ali Asadabadi, 2022. "Modeling the Truck Appointment System as a Multi-Player Game," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-25, July.
    5. Amir Gharehgozli & Nima Zaerpour & Rene Koster, 2020. "Container terminal layout design: transition and future," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(4), pages 610-639, December.
    6. Feng, Yuanjun & Song, Dong-Ping & Li, Dong & Zeng, Qingcheng, 2020. "The stochastic container relocation problem with flexible service policies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 116-163.
    7. Escudero-Santana, Alejandro & Muñuzuri, Jesús & Cortés, Pablo & Onieva, Luis, 2021. "The one container drayage problem with soft time windows," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    8. Bowei Xu & Xiaoyan Liu & Yongsheng Yang & Junjun Li & Octavian Postolache, 2021. "Optimization for a Multi-Constraint Truck Appointment System Considering Morning and Evening Peak Congestion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Ahmed M. Abdelmagid & Mohamed Gheith & Amr Eltawil, 2022. "Scheduling External Trucks Appointments in Container Terminals to Minimize Cost and Truck Turnaround Times," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-22, July.
    10. Houming Fan & Xiaoxue Ren & Zhenfeng Guo & Yang Li, 2019. "Truck Scheduling Problem Considering Carbon Emissions under Truck Appointment System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-23, November.
    11. Budhi S. Wibowo & Jan C. Fransoo, 2023. "Performance analysis of a drop-swap terminal to mitigate truck congestion at chemical sites," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 416-454, June.
    12. Azab, Ahmed & Morita, Hiroshi, 2022. "Coordinating truck appointments with container relocations and retrievals in container terminals under partial appointments information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    13. Nanxi Wang & Daofang Chang & Xiaowei Shi & Jun Yuan & Yinping Gao, 2019. "Analysis and Design of Typical Automated Container Terminals Layout Considering Carbon Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-40, May.
    14. Tareq Abu Aisha & Mustapha Ouhimmou & Marc Paquet, 2020. "Optimization of Container Terminal Layouts in the Seaport—Case of Port of Montreal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, February.
    15. Geoffrey C. Preston & Phillip Horne & Maria Paola Scaparra & Jesse R. O’Hanley, 2020. "Masterplanning at the Port of Dover: The Use of Discrete-Event Simulation in Managing Road Traffic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, February.
    16. Kastner, Marvin & Kämmerling, Nicolas & Jahn, Carlos & Clausen, Uwe, 2020. "Equipment selection and layout planning - Literature overview and research directions," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Data Science in Maritime and City Logistics: Data-driven Solutions for Logistics and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conferen, volume 30, pages 485-519, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    17. Ngoc Anh Dung Do & Izabela Ewa Nielsen & Gang Chen & Peter Nielsen, 2016. "A simulation-based genetic algorithm approach for reducing emissions from import container pick-up operation at container terminal," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 242(2), pages 285-301, July.
    18. Dalila B. M. M. Fontes & S. Mahdi Homayouni, 2023. "A bi-objective multi-population biased random key genetic algorithm for joint scheduling quay cranes and speed adjustable vehicles in container terminals," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 241-268, March.
    19. Bechir Ben Daya & Jean-François Audy, 2024. "Port Access Fluidity Management during a Major Extension Project: A Simulation-Based Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-30, March.
    20. Mohammad Torkjazi & Nathan Huynh, 2019. "Effectiveness of Dynamic Insertion Scheduling Strategy for Demand-Responsive Paratransit Vehicles Using Agent-Based Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-12, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1904-:d:1346117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.