IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i5p1854-d1344823.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Coal Char-Based Building Products: Manufacturing, Engineering Performance, and Techno-Economic Analysis for the USA Market

Author

Listed:
  • Suraj Prasad Pandey

    (Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering and Construction Management, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA)

  • Hua Yu

    (Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering and Construction Management, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA)

  • Chooikim Lau

    (Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering and Construction Management, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA)

  • Kam Ng

    (Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering and Construction Management, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA)

Abstract

Common building products, i.e., thin brick and stone veneer, add the look of brick walls or the enduring charm of natural stones into buildings and houses without imposing a substantial increase in structural load. This study investigates the mechanical strength, durability, and economic feasibility of producing innovative char-based thin bricks and stone veneers. The char-based thin brick vacuum treated with hydrophobic liquid exhibits water absorption rates within the 4–7% range, displays durability against 50 freeze–thaw (F-T) cycles, and maintains a saturation coefficient below 0.6. In contrast, commercial thin bricks have water absorption of 9–12%. Treated char-based stone veneer has water absorption of 5.3% and an average compressive strength of 19.2 MPa, maintains its structural integrity throughout 50 F-T cycles, and exhibits a negligible linear shrinkage of approximately 0.01%. In contrast, commercial stone veneers have water absorption of 10–16%. These engineering properties meet the criteria as per ASTM standards C1088 and C1670 for thin brick and stone veneer, respectively. A techno-economic study was preliminarily conducted to examine the potential cost efficiency and cash flow in manufacturing these char-based building products. The manufacturing cost of USD 25.83 is lower than the average market price of 64.65 USD/sq. m. for thin bricks. The manufacturing cost of USD 32.65 is lower than the average market price of 129.17 USD/sq. m. for stone veneers. These comparisons present a compelling economic advantage for their commercialization. This comprehensive study has demonstrated the advantages of sustainable char-based stone veneers and thin bricks regarding engineering performance and economic benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Suraj Prasad Pandey & Hua Yu & Chooikim Lau & Kam Ng, 2024. "New Coal Char-Based Building Products: Manufacturing, Engineering Performance, and Techno-Economic Analysis for the USA Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-26, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1854-:d:1344823
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1854/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1854/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Yongliang & Jin, Bo & Zou, Xixian & Zhao, Haibo, 2016. "A clean coal utilization technology based on coal pyrolysis and chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling: Principle and experimental validation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 181-189.
    2. Ngiseng Seav & Kyoung Su Kim & Jae Hoon Kim & Seung Woo Lee & Young Kyu Kim, 2023. "Effects of Roller Compacted Concrete Incorporating Coal Bottom Ash as a Fine Aggregate Replacement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Delu & Ma, Gang & Song, Xuefeng & Liu, Yun, 2017. "Energy price slump and policy response in the coal-chemical industry district: A case study of Ordos with a system dynamics model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 325-339.
    2. R. Saravanakumar & K. S. Elango & V. Revathi & D. Balaji, 2024. "Influence of Aggressive Environment in Macro and Microstructural Properties of Bottom Ash Geopolymer Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Li, Moshan & Lu, Yiyu & Hu, Erfeng & Yang, Yang & Tian, Yishui & Dai, Chongyang & Li, Chenhao, 2023. "Fast co-pyrolysis characteristics of high-alkali coal and polyethylene using infrared rapid heating," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    4. Aziz, Muhammad & Juangsa, Firman Bagja & Kurniawan, Winarto & Budiman, Bentang Arief, 2016. "Clean Co-production of H2 and power from low rank coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 489-497.
    5. Cao, Yang & He, Boshu & Ding, Guangchao & Su, Liangbin & Duan, Zhipeng, 2017. "Energy and exergy investigation on two improved IGCC power plants with different CO2 capture schemes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 47-57.
    6. Yan, Jingchun & Shen, Laihong & Ou, Zhaowei & Wu, Jian & Jiang, Shouxi & Gu, Haiming, 2019. "Enhancing the performance of iron ore by introducing K and Na ions from biomass ashes in a CLC process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 168-180.
    7. Xiang, Hongjin & Kuang, Yanxiang & He, Hongbo & Yao, Shujie, 2022. "Could tariffs reduce overcapacity and environmental pollution? Evidence from China’s adjustment of tariffs on coal," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 129-144.
    8. Li, Bei & Liu, Gang & Bi, Ming-Shu & Li, Zhen-Bao & Han, Bing & Shu, Chi-Min, 2021. "Self-ignition risk classification for coal dust layers of three coal types on a hot surface," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1854-:d:1344823. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.