IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i4p1644-d1340034.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integration of Land Use Potential in Energy System Optimization Models at Regional Scale: The Pantelleria Island Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Daniele Mosso

    (MAHTEP Group, Dipartimento Energia “Galileo Ferraris”, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Turin, Italy)

  • Luca Rajteri

    (MAHTEP Group, Dipartimento Energia “Galileo Ferraris”, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Turin, Italy)

  • Laura Savoldi

    (MAHTEP Group, Dipartimento Energia “Galileo Ferraris”, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Turin, Italy)

Abstract

In the context of the energy transition, the integration of land use considerations into energy planning can provide significant improvements. In energy system optimization models (ESOMs), land use aspects can be integrated at the cost of a finer spatial resolution and a more detailed characterization of land, tailored to regional constraints and specificities. Additionally, an assessment of trade-offs with alternative land uses is necessary. Nevertheless, they are commonly neglected. This study addresses the challenge of incorporating land use aspects into ESOMs, with a focus on the unique context of Pantelleria Island. It aims to bridge the gap in methodologies for renewable energy potential assessment and model integration, considering the critical role of land pricing and availability. It combines geospatial data aggregation with model adaptation to include detailed land use aspects. The findings highlight the substantial impact of land costs on renewable energy planning, with land pricing significantly altering model outcomes. This research offers key insights for sustainable energy planning and underscores the importance of considering land use in energy transition strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniele Mosso & Luca Rajteri & Laura Savoldi, 2024. "Integration of Land Use Potential in Energy System Optimization Models at Regional Scale: The Pantelleria Island Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-34, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1644-:d:1340034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1644/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1644/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Yi-kuang & Kirkerud, Jon Gustav & Bolkesjø, Torjus Folsland, 2022. "Balancing GHG mitigation and land-use conflicts: Alternative Northern European energy system scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    2. Chang, Miguel & Thellufsen, Jakob Zink & Zakeri, Behnam & Pickering, Bryn & Pfenninger, Stefan & Lund, Henrik & Østergaard, Poul Alberg, 2021. "Trends in tools and approaches for modelling the energy transition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    3. Claudio Moscoloni & Fernando Zarra & Riccardo Novo & Enrico Giglio & Alberto Vargiu & Guglielmina Mutani & Giovanni Bracco & Giuliana Mattiazzo, 2022. "Wind Turbines and Rooftop Photovoltaic Technical Potential Assessment: Application to Sicilian Minor Islands," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-35, July.
    4. Martínez-Gordón, R. & Morales-España, G. & Sijm, J. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2021. "A review of the role of spatial resolution in energy systems modelling: Lessons learned and applicability to the North Sea region," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    5. Frysztacki, Martha Maria & Hörsch, Jonas & Hagenmeyer, Veit & Brown, Tom, 2021. "The strong effect of network resolution on electricity system models with high shares of wind and solar," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    6. Elkadeem, Mohamed R. & Younes, Ali & Mazzeo, Domenico & Jurasz, Jakub & Elia Campana, Pietro & Sharshir, Swellam W. & Alaam, Mohamed A., 2022. "Geospatial-assisted multi-criterion analysis of solar and wind power geographical-technical-economic potential assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    7. Zanakis, Stelios H. & Solomon, Anthony & Wishart, Nicole & Dublish, Sandipa, 1998. "Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(3), pages 507-529, June.
    8. David Severin Ryberg & Martin Robinius & Detlef Stolten, 2018. "Evaluating Land Eligibility Constraints of Renewable Energy Sources in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Phillips, K. & Moncada, J.A. & Ergun, H. & Delarue, E., 2023. "Spatial representation of renewable technologies in generation expansion planning models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).
    2. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    3. Frysztacki, Martha Maria & Hagenmeyer, Veit & Brown, Tom, 2023. "Inverse methods: How feasible are spatially low-resolved capacity expansion modelling results when disaggregated at high spatial resolution?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    4. Chang, Miguel & Lund, Henrik & Thellufsen, Jakob Zinck & Østergaard, Poul Alberg, 2023. "Perspectives on purpose-driven coupling of energy system models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    5. Raventós, Oriol & Dengiz, Thomas & Medjroubi, Wided & Unaichi, Chinonso & Bruckmeier, Andreas & Finck, Rafael, 2022. "Comparison of different methods of spatial disaggregation of electricity generation and consumption time series," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    6. Shruthi Patil & Leander Kotzur & Detlef Stolten, 2022. "Advanced Spatial and Technological Aggregation Scheme for Energy System Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-26, December.
    7. Lohr, C. & Schlemminger, M. & Peterssen, F. & Bensmann, A. & Niepelt, R. & Brendel, R. & Hanke-Rauschenbach, R., 2022. "Spatial concentration of renewables in energy system optimization models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 144-154.
    8. Göke, Leonard & Kendziorski, Mario, 2022. "Adequacy of time-series reduction for renewable energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    9. Mier, Mathias & Azarova, Valeriya, 2024. "Investment cost specifications revisited," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    10. Maimó-Far, Aina & Homar, Víctor & Tantet, Alexis & Drobinski, Philippe, 2024. "The trade-off between socio-environmental awareness and renewable penetration targets in energy transition roadmaps," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    11. Lund, Henrik & Thellufsen, Jakob Zinck & Sorknæs, Peter & Mathiesen, Brian Vad & Chang, Miguel & Madsen, Poul Thøis & Kany, Mikkel Strunge & Skov, Iva Ridjan, 2022. "Smart energy Denmark. A consistent and detailed strategy for a fully decarbonized society," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    12. Reddy, Sohail R., 2021. "A machine learning approach for modeling irregular regions with multiple owners in wind farm layout design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    13. Krejci, Igor & Voriskova, Andrea, 2010. "Analysis of the Method for the Selection of Regions with Concentrated State Aid," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 2(3), pages 1-8, September.
    14. Leonard Goke & Jens Weibezahn & Christian von Hirschhausen, 2021. "A collective blueprint, not a crystal ball: How expectations and participation shape long-term energy scenarios," Papers 2112.04821, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    15. Kokaraki, Nikoleta & Hopfe, Christina J. & Robinson, Elaine & Nikolaidou, Elli, 2019. "Testing the reliability of deterministic multi-criteria decision-making methods using building performance simulation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 991-1007.
    16. Barbón, A. & Fortuny Ayuso, P. & Bayón, L. & Silva, C.A., 2023. "Experimental and numerical investigation of the influence of terrain slope on the performance of single-axis trackers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    17. Mulliner, Emma & Smallbone, Kieran & Maliene, Vida, 2013. "An assessment of sustainable housing affordability using a multiple criteria decision making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 270-279.
    18. Wirtz, Marco, 2023. "nPro: A web-based planning tool for designing district energy systems and thermal networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    19. Róbert Csalódi & Tímea Czvetkó & Viktor Sebestyén & János Abonyi, 2022. "Sectoral Analysis of Energy Transition Paths and Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-26, October.
    20. Manel Baucells & Rakesh K. Sarin, 2003. "Group Decisions with Multiple Criteria," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(8), pages 1105-1118, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1644-:d:1340034. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.