IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i3p1310-d1332884.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Current Knowledge and Pending Research on Sulfate Resistance of Recycled Aggregate Concrete

Author

Listed:
  • Lautaro R. Santillán

    (Instituto de Investigaciones en Tecnología y Ciencias de la Ingeniería (IITCI CONICET-UNCo), Neuquén 8300, Argentina
    Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) CCT-La Plata, La Plata 1900, Argentina)

  • Claudio J. Zega

    (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) CCT-La Plata, La Plata 1900, Argentina
    Laboratorio de Entrenamiento Multidisciplinario para la Investigación Tecnológica (LEMIT), Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas (CIC), La Plata 1900, Argentina)

  • Edgardo F. Irassar

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Civil y Agrimensura, Universidad del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (UNCPBA), Olavarría 7400, Argentina
    Centro de Investigaciones en Física e Ingeniería del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (CIFICEN), Olavarría 7400, Argentina)

Abstract

The building sector’s sustainability requires construction and demolition waste (CDW) to contribute to the circular economy. Among the CDW, recycled concrete aggregates (RA) have been mainly studied to replace natural aggregates. Still, the approval of their use in regulations and standards is slower. Some barriers to the adoption of RA are related to the durability of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC). However, their physical and mechanical properties have been extensively studied. The durability risks associated with sulfate attacks have been solved for conventional concrete. However, sulfate attack on recycled concrete still raises numerous unsolved questions. In this literature review, the experience of sulfate attack on RAC is compiled and analyzed using a compressive framework highlighting the most relevant aspects of the new matrix in RAC and the old matrix of RA to support its relevance to the damaging sulfate process. Suggestions for further research are presented to understand the full extent of this issue and contribute to incorporating and extending recycled aggregates into existing regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Lautaro R. Santillán & Claudio J. Zega & Edgardo F. Irassar, 2024. "Current Knowledge and Pending Research on Sulfate Resistance of Recycled Aggregate Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1310-:d:1332884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1310/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/3/1310/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haseog Kim & Sangki Park & Hayong Kim, 2016. "The Optimum Production Method for Quality Improvement of Recycled Aggregates Using Sulfuric Acid and the Abrasion Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Rao, Akash & Jha, Kumar N. & Misra, Sudhir, 2007. "Use of aggregates from recycled construction and demolition waste in concrete," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 71-81.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Noushin Islam & Malindu Sandanayake & Shobha Muthukumaran & Dimuth Navaratna, 2024. "Review on Sustainable Construction and Demolition Waste Management—Challenges and Research Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-30, April.
    2. Anna M. Grabiec & Jeonghyun Kim & Andrzej Ubysz & Pilar Bilbao, 2021. "Some Remarks towards a Better Understanding of the Use of Concrete Recycled Aggregate: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Wanchai Yodsudjai & Kirati Nitichote, 2022. "Chloride Penetration Behavior of Concrete Made from Various Types of Recycled Concrete Aggregate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Knoeri, Christof & Binder, Claudia R. & Althaus, Hans-Joerg, 2011. "Decisions on recycling: Construction stakeholders’ decisions regarding recycled mineral construction materials," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(11), pages 1039-1050.
    5. Jin, Ruoyu & Li, Bo & Zhou, Tongyu & Wanatowski, Dariusz & Piroozfar, Poorang, 2017. "An empirical study of perceptions towards construction and demolition waste recycling and reuse in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 86-98.
    6. Noguchi, Takafumi & Park, Won-Jun & Kitagaki, Ryoma, 2015. "Risk evaluation for recycled aggregate according to deleterious impurity content considering deconstruction scenarios and production methods," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PB), pages 405-416.
    7. Tam, Vivian W.Y. & Le, Khoa N., 2007. "Aggregate testing using 2nd-, 7th- and 10th-order interpolation polynomials," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 39-57.
    8. Eduardo Kloeckner Sbardelotto & Karyne Ferreira dos Santos & Isabel Milagre Martins & Berenice Martins Toralles & Manuel Gomes Vieira & Catarina Brazão Farinha, 2024. "Influence of Recycling Processes on Properties of Fine Recycled Concrete Aggregates (FRCA): An Overview," Waste, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Wijayasundara, Mayuri & Mendis, Priyan & Zhang, Lihai & Sofi, Massoud, 2016. "Financial assessment of manufacturing recycled aggregate concrete in ready-mix concrete plants," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 187-201.
    10. Castorina S. Vieira & Paulo M. Pereira, 2022. "Influence of the Geosynthetic Type and Compaction Conditions on the Pullout Behaviour of Geosynthetics Embedded in Recycled Construction and Demolition Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, January.
    11. Sabai, M.M. & Cox, M.G.D.M. & Mato, R.R. & Egmond, E.L.C. & Lichtenberg, J.J.N., 2013. "Concrete block production from construction and demolition waste in Tanzania," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 9-19.
    12. Paulo Miguel Pereira & Castorina Silva Vieira, 2022. "A Literature Review on the Use of Recycled Construction and Demolition Materials in Unbound Pavement Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-28, October.
    13. Spoerri, Andy & Lang, Daniel J. & Binder, Claudia R. & Scholz, Roland W., 2009. "Expert-based scenarios for strategic waste and resource management planning—C&D waste recycling in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(10), pages 592-600.
    14. Lotfi, Somayeh & Deja, Jan & Rem, Peter & Mróz, Radosław & van Roekel, Eric & van der Stelt, Hans, 2014. "Mechanical recycling of EOL concrete into high-grade aggregates," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 117-125.
    15. Mohammed A. Abed & Bassam A. Tayeh & B. H. Abu Bakar & Rita Nemes, 2021. "Two-Year Non-Destructive Evaluation of Eco-Efficient Concrete at Ambient Temperature and after Freeze-Thaw Cycles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, September.
    16. Athanas KONIN & David KOUADIO, 2011. "Influence of Cement Content on Recycled Aggregates Concrete Properties," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(1), pages 1-23, February.
    17. Li Wang & Yanhong Lv & Siyu Huang & Yu Liu & Xinrong Li, 2023. "The Evolution of Research on C&D Waste and Sustainable Development of Resources: A Bibliometric Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    18. Yuh-Shan Ho, 2019. "Comment on Chen, J.; Su, Y.; Si, H.; Chen, J. Managerial Areas of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Scientometric Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15 , 2350," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-4, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:1310-:d:1332884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.