IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1207-d730306.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of the Geosynthetic Type and Compaction Conditions on the Pullout Behaviour of Geosynthetics Embedded in Recycled Construction and Demolition Materials

Author

Listed:
  • Castorina S. Vieira

    (CONSTRUCT, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, R. Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Paulo M. Pereira

    (CONSTRUCT, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, R. Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

The effects of the climate change that the planet has been experiencing, and the growing awareness of citizens that natural resources are finite, highlight the inevitability of making society more sustainable. Since the construction industry is responsible for a high consumption of natural resources and it simultaneously produces high volumes of waste, it is of great importance to investigate the feasibility of using construction and demolition (C&D) wastes as alternatives to common natural materials. This paper investigates the feasibility of using fine-grain recycled C&D wastes as backfill material of geosynthetic reinforced steep slopes, through a laboratory study focused mainly on the pullout behaviour of two geosynthetics embedded in these alternative materials. The influence of the geosynthetic type, moisture content and compaction degree of the recycled C&D material on the pullout behaviour is assessed and discussed. The physical and mechanical characterization of the filling material is also presented. The pullout test results have pointed out that, although the two geosynthetics have similar tensile strength, the pullout resistance of the geogrid is higher than that of the geotextile and is achieved at lower frontal displacements. While the reduction of the compaction moisture content below the optimum value induced a slight decrease in the geogrid pullout resistance (ranging from 5% to 7%), conversely the pullout capacity of the geotextile increased up to 22%. The compaction degree of the recycled C&D material had the expected effect on the geotextile pullout resistance, reflected in an increase of about 20% when the degree of compaction rose from 80% to 90%. However, the expected trend was not observed on the geogrid pullout behaviour. The pullout interaction coefficient tended to decrease with the variation of the compaction moisture content around the optimum value (maximum decrease of 33% and 16% for the geogrid and the geotextile, respectively) and with an increase in the vertical confining pressure from 10 kPa up to 50 kPa (decrease around 25%). The average value of the pullout interaction coefficient, fb, ranged from 0.61 to 1.09 for the geogrid and from 0.67 to 1.25 for the geotextile. From all these findings it can be concluded that recycled C&D materials can be seen as an environmentally friendly alternatives to the natural resources commonly used in the construction of geosynthetic-reinforced embankments.

Suggested Citation

  • Castorina S. Vieira & Paulo M. Pereira, 2022. "Influence of the Geosynthetic Type and Compaction Conditions on the Pullout Behaviour of Geosynthetics Embedded in Recycled Construction and Demolition Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1207-:d:730306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1207/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1207/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caroline Santana Rangel & Mayara Amario & Marco Pepe & Enzo Martinelli & Romildo Dias Toledo Filho, 2020. "Durability of Structural Recycled Aggregate Concrete Subjected to Freeze-Thaw Cycles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Rao, Akash & Jha, Kumar N. & Misra, Sudhir, 2007. "Use of aggregates from recycled construction and demolition waste in concrete," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 71-81.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luis Alonso González Corrales & Rodrigo Cesar Pierozan & Gregório Luís Silva Araújo & Ennio Marques Palmeira, 2023. "Evaluation of Construction and Demolition Waste and Other Alternative Fills for Strip-Reinforced Soil Walls," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Paulo Miguel Pereira & Castorina Silva Vieira, 2022. "A Literature Review on the Use of Recycled Construction and Demolition Materials in Unbound Pavement Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-28, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Noushin Islam & Malindu Sandanayake & Shobha Muthukumaran & Dimuth Navaratna, 2024. "Review on Sustainable Construction and Demolition Waste Management—Challenges and Research Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-30, April.
    2. Anna M. Grabiec & Jeonghyun Kim & Andrzej Ubysz & Pilar Bilbao, 2021. "Some Remarks towards a Better Understanding of the Use of Concrete Recycled Aggregate: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Wanchai Yodsudjai & Kirati Nitichote, 2022. "Chloride Penetration Behavior of Concrete Made from Various Types of Recycled Concrete Aggregate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Knoeri, Christof & Binder, Claudia R. & Althaus, Hans-Joerg, 2011. "Decisions on recycling: Construction stakeholders’ decisions regarding recycled mineral construction materials," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(11), pages 1039-1050.
    5. Jin, Ruoyu & Li, Bo & Zhou, Tongyu & Wanatowski, Dariusz & Piroozfar, Poorang, 2017. "An empirical study of perceptions towards construction and demolition waste recycling and reuse in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 86-98.
    6. Noguchi, Takafumi & Park, Won-Jun & Kitagaki, Ryoma, 2015. "Risk evaluation for recycled aggregate according to deleterious impurity content considering deconstruction scenarios and production methods," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PB), pages 405-416.
    7. Tam, Vivian W.Y. & Le, Khoa N., 2007. "Aggregate testing using 2nd-, 7th- and 10th-order interpolation polynomials," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 39-57.
    8. Xutong Huang & Tian Su & Jinxu Wang & Fubo Cao & Chenxia Wang, 2023. "Bond Performance of Corroded Steel Reinforcement and Recycled Coarse Aggregate Concrete after Freeze–Thaw Cycles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, April.
    9. Wijayasundara, Mayuri & Mendis, Priyan & Zhang, Lihai & Sofi, Massoud, 2016. "Financial assessment of manufacturing recycled aggregate concrete in ready-mix concrete plants," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 187-201.
    10. Sabai, M.M. & Cox, M.G.D.M. & Mato, R.R. & Egmond, E.L.C. & Lichtenberg, J.J.N., 2013. "Concrete block production from construction and demolition waste in Tanzania," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 9-19.
    11. Paulo Miguel Pereira & Castorina Silva Vieira, 2022. "A Literature Review on the Use of Recycled Construction and Demolition Materials in Unbound Pavement Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-28, October.
    12. Spoerri, Andy & Lang, Daniel J. & Binder, Claudia R. & Scholz, Roland W., 2009. "Expert-based scenarios for strategic waste and resource management planning—C&D waste recycling in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(10), pages 592-600.
    13. Lotfi, Somayeh & Deja, Jan & Rem, Peter & Mróz, Radosław & van Roekel, Eric & van der Stelt, Hans, 2014. "Mechanical recycling of EOL concrete into high-grade aggregates," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 117-125.
    14. Lautaro R. Santillán & Claudio J. Zega & Edgardo F. Irassar, 2024. "Current Knowledge and Pending Research on Sulfate Resistance of Recycled Aggregate Concrete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, February.
    15. Fausto Minelli & Enzo Martinelli & Luca Facconi, 2021. "Innovative Structural Applications of High Performance Concrete Materials in Sustainable Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-2, November.
    16. Mohammed A. Abed & Bassam A. Tayeh & B. H. Abu Bakar & Rita Nemes, 2021. "Two-Year Non-Destructive Evaluation of Eco-Efficient Concrete at Ambient Temperature and after Freeze-Thaw Cycles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Athanas KONIN & David KOUADIO, 2011. "Influence of Cement Content on Recycled Aggregates Concrete Properties," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(1), pages 1-23, February.
    18. Li Wang & Yanhong Lv & Siyu Huang & Yu Liu & Xinrong Li, 2023. "The Evolution of Research on C&D Waste and Sustainable Development of Resources: A Bibliometric Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    19. Yuh-Shan Ho, 2019. "Comment on Chen, J.; Su, Y.; Si, H.; Chen, J. Managerial Areas of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Scientometric Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15 , 2350," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-4, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1207-:d:730306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.