IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i2p908-d1323357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Construction of Karst Landscape Ecological Security Pattern Based on Conflict between Human and Nature in Puzhehei

Author

Listed:
  • Chunhua Li

    (College of Landscape Architecture and Horticulture Science, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

  • Jin Wang

    (College of Landscape Architecture and Horticulture Science, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

  • Xincen Liu

    (College of Landscape Architecture and Horticulture Science, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

  • Kejian Xu

    (College of Landscape Architecture and Horticulture Science, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

Abstract

A key means of promoting the high-quality development of karst areas is the maintenance of the area’s ecological security. A full recognition of the special ecological function of karst areas, as well as their significance to the surrounding region’s ecological, economic, and social development, is crucial in strengthening the overall strategic deployment of the national ecological construction and the protection and sustainable development of karst landscapes around the globe. In this study, the karst landscape of Puzhehei, Qiubei County, Wenshan Prefecture, Yunnan Province, China, was used as the research object. This study identified ecological source sites through a combination of morphological spatial pattern analysis and landscape connectivity assessment. As a result, 10 factors were selected to construct a comprehensive ecological resistance surface from the natural environment and socio-economic perspective; the resistance surface was corrected by combining the sensitivity of rocky desertification. An ecological corridor and ecological nodes were identified to construct the ecological security pattern based on the minimum cumulative resistance model and circuit theory. The results show that (1) the source areas of the Puzhehei karst landscape ecological protection comprised 11 core area patches with the landscape connectivity index of (dPC) ≥ 10, with a total area of 166.6572 km 2 , which constituted 46.06% of the total study area, and the ecological source area totaled 77.275 km 2 , or 21.36% of the total study area; (2) there were 78 potential ecological corridors in the Puzhehei karst region, with a total length of 545.186 km, including 12 key corridors and 66 general corridors; (3) a total of 51 ecological nodes were identified, including 11 “source-type ecological nodes”, 30 “ecological pinch points”, and 10 “ecological obstacles”, including 16 key ecological nodes. This study provides a theoretical basis for the integration of Puzhehei Nature Reserve, as well as a reference for the ecologically sustainable development of similar karst areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Chunhua Li & Jin Wang & Xincen Liu & Kejian Xu, 2024. "Construction of Karst Landscape Ecological Security Pattern Based on Conflict between Human and Nature in Puzhehei," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:908-:d:1323357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/908/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/908/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liang Lv & Shihao Zhang & Jie Zhu & Ziming Wang & Zhe Wang & Guoqing Li & Chen Yang, 2022. "Ecological Restoration Strategies for Mountainous Cities Based on Ecological Security Patterns and Circuit Theory: A Case of Central Urban Areas in Chongqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Jiaying Yan & Shuang Du & Jinbo Zhang & Weiyu Yu, 2023. "Analyzing Transregional Vernacular Cultural Landscape Security Patterns with a Nature–Culture Lens: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta Demonstration Area, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-29, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanlong Guo & Peiyu He & Pengyu Chen & Linfu Zhang, 2024. "Ecological Evaluation of Land Resources in the Yangtze River Delta Region by Remote Sensing Observation," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Yanhai Zhou & Jianwei Geng & Xingzhao Liu, 2024. "Urban Habitat Quality Enhancement and Optimization under Ecological Network Constraints," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Huihui Yang & Shuiyu Yan & Xinhao Wang & Chun Li & Haixing Meng & Qiang Yao, 2024. "Constructing Ecological Networks Based on Ecosystem Services and Network Analysis in Chongqing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-24, May.
    4. Fengyu Wang & Shuai Tong & Yun Chu & Tianlong Liu & Xiang Ji, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Key Areas of Territorial Ecological Restoration in Resource-Exhausted Cities: A Case Study of Jiawang District, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, September.
    5. Liangliang Wang & Yixin Wang & Wencan Huang & Jie Han, 2024. "Analysis Methods for Landscapes and Features of Traditional Villages Based on Digital Technology—The Example of Puping Village in Zhangzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Shan Ke & Hui Pan & Bowen Jin, 2023. "Identification of Priority Areas for Ecological Restoration Based on Human Disturbance and Ecological Security Patterns: A Case Study of Fuzhou City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, February.
    7. Yue Chen & Qikang Zhong & Bo Li, 2023. "Positive or Negative Viewpoint Determines the Overall Scenic Beauty of a Scene: A Landscape Perception Evaluation Based on a Panoramic View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:908-:d:1323357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.