IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i2p699-d1318394.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Sustainable Online Education: A Cross-Disciplinary Analysis of IT Device Utilization among Slovakian and Hungarian University Students

Author

Listed:
  • Nóra Gombkötő

    (Albert Kázmér Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Széchenyi István University, 9200 Mosonmagyaróvár, Hungary)

  • Iveta Štempeľová

    (Department of Pharmacy and Social Pharmacy, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, 041 81 Košice, Slovakia)

  • Ondrej Takáč

    (Faculty of Economics and Informatics, J. Selye University, 945 01 Komárno, Slovakia)

Abstract

By the onset of the 21st century, online presence had become prevalent in higher education, with the COVID-19 pandemic further accelerating this trend. However, the success of online education and its assessment by students can differ significantly from region to region and according to the field of study. This can be influenced by students’ habits of using IT devices, but it can also occur the other way around. In this research, experiences related to online education were examined in the fields of Informatics, Agriculture and Pharmacy education at two higher-education institutions in Slovakia and one in Hungary, considering the environmental and social sustainability implications. In the study, in addition to simple statistical methods, a cross-tabulation analysis was carried out using Cramer’s V method. The results have shown that the students of the investigated institutions confidently navigate the online world; they are conscious users of IT tools without being addicted. A total of 74% of students in Mosonmagyaróvár believe they possess sufficient information about the risks associated with computers, mobile phones, and the Internet, whereas only 34% of students in Košice share the same sentiment. The reason for the differences between these characteristics can be attributed to the specialties of the different majors, and not to those arising from regional differences, raising important questions about the ecological sustainability of online education practices. A relatively great consistency can be observed in the assessment of online learning among students from the three institutions, with approximately 85% expressing overall satisfaction with the online learning experience. The easier availability of study materials and savings on travel are mentioned as advantages, contributing to economic sustainability. However, separation from their mates and the lack of practical training may be regarded as a disadvantage for them, as they seem to have a preference for face-to-face training. Overall, it may be concluded that purely online training in the fields of Informatics, Agriculture, and Pharmacy training is not feasible for the time being, necessitating a balanced and sustainable approach for the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Nóra Gombkötő & Iveta Štempeľová & Ondrej Takáč, 2024. "Evaluating Sustainable Online Education: A Cross-Disciplinary Analysis of IT Device Utilization among Slovakian and Hungarian University Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-28, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:699-:d:1318394
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/699/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/699/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muddassar Sarfraz & Ghulam Hussain & Muhammad Shahid & Amir Riaz & Muhammad Muavia & Yahya Saleem Fahed & Faiza Azam & Mohammad Tallal Abdullah, 2022. "Medical Students’ Online Learning Perceptions, Online Learning Readiness, and Learning Outcomes during COVID-19: The Moderating Role of Teacher’s Readiness to Teach Online," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Fatima Riaz & Syed Esam Mahmood & Tahmina Begum & Mohammad Tauheed Ahmad & Ayoub A. Al-Shaikh & Ausaf Ahmad & Ayed A. Shati & Mohammad Suhail Khan, 2023. "Students’ Preferences and Perceptions Regarding Online versus Offline Teaching and Learning Post-COVID-19 Lockdown," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohd Shafie Rosli & Nor Shela Saleh & Azlah Md. Ali & Suaibah Abu Bakar, 2022. "Self-Determination Theory and Online Learning in University: Advancements, Future Direction and Research Gaps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Saeid Asgharzadehbonab & Arif Akkeleş & Hasan Ozder, 2022. "Students’ Academic Performance and Perceptions towards Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic at a Large Public University in Northern Cyprus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Collins Opoku Antwi & Michelle Allyshia Belle & Seth Yeboah Ntim & Yuanchun Wu & Emmanuel Affum-Osei & Michael Osei Aboagye & Jun Ren, 2022. "COVID-19 Pandemic and International Students’ Mental Health in China: Age, Gender, Chronic Health Condition and Having Infected Relative as Risk Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Abdullatif A. AlMunifi & Mohammed S. Alfawzan, 2023. "Back to the New Normal in Engineering Education towards Student-Centered Learning: Remote? In Person? Hybrid?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:699-:d:1318394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.