IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p11031-d1545009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Spatial Pattern Optimization Based on “Double Evaluation”: A Case Study of Urban Agglomeration in Central Yunnan, China

Author

Listed:
  • Guoping Chen

    (Faculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China
    Chinese Academy of Surveying and Mapping, Beijing 100039, China)

  • Xiaohui Long

    (Noncommissioned Officer Academy of People’s Armed Police, Hangzhou 310012, China)

  • Chuntong Wu

    (Faculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China)

  • Junsan Zhao

    (Faculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China)

Abstract

The evaluation of the carrying capacity of urban resources and the environment and the suitability of urban spatial development (referred to as “double evaluation”) is a fundamental prerequisite for territorial spatial planning. A scientifically planned urban spatial layout is key to balancing economic, social, and environmental benefits, which directly impacts urbanization levels and regional high-quality development. In this study, a double evaluation index system was established for the city cluster in central Yunnan based on the theories of “double evaluation” and main functional zones. The PLUS model was used to predict the distribution of future urban spatial patterns, considering factors like main function zones, and to optimize the spatial patterns of cities and towns in the study area. The findings are as follows. (1) The area of land suitable for urban construction in the study area is 25,107.51 km 2 , mainly distributed in the southern and central urban areas, as well as in the Zhanyi and Qilin districts to the east. (2) More than 76% of the land designated for urban construction is located in suitable areas, with an area of 680.51 km 2 , which represents only 2.71% of the total suitable land, indicating significant potential for further urban development. The PLUS simulation reveals that the urban area in the study area will reach 235.41 km 2 by the future, with 83.67% of urban construction space concentrated in suitable areas. Additionally, 69.11% of urban construction space and 74.53% of suitable land for urban construction are located in the key development area, which covers 618.43 km 2 and 18,713.28 km 2 , respectively. This highlights the key development area’s crucial role in urban expansion and its significant potential for further development. Despite the region’s high level of economic activity and urbanization, there remains considerable potential for the expansion of towns over a wide area. This study provides valuable insights for optimizing urban spatial layouts, the allocation of national land space functions, and promoting orderly development.

Suggested Citation

  • Guoping Chen & Xiaohui Long & Chuntong Wu & Junsan Zhao, 2024. "Urban Spatial Pattern Optimization Based on “Double Evaluation”: A Case Study of Urban Agglomeration in Central Yunnan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-26, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11031-:d:1545009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11031/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11031/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jinyao Lin & Qitong Chen, 2023. "Analyzing and Simulating the Influence of a Water Conveyance Project on Land Use Conditions in the Tarim River Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Zhang, Jing & Li, Sinan & Lin, Naifa & Lin, Yue & Yuan, Shaofeng & Zhang, Ling & Zhu, Jinxia & Wang, Ke & Gan, Muye & Zhu, Congmou, 2022. "Spatial identification and trade-off analysis of land use functions improve spatial zoning management in rapid urbanized areas, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    3. Guoqing Chen & Saifei Wang, 2023. "Evaluation of Urban Resource Environmental Carrying Capacity and Land Spatial Development Suitability in a Semiarid Area of the Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Muxin Jia & Ang Liu & Taro Narahara, 2024. "The Integration of Dual Evaluation and Minimum Spanning Tree Clustering to Support Decision-Making in Territorial Spatial Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-20, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chenhao Zhu & Jonah Susskind & Mario Giampieri & Hazel Backus O’Neil & Alan M. Berger, 2023. "Optimizing Sustainable Suburban Expansion with Autonomous Mobility through a Parametric Design Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-31, September.
    2. Shunqian Gao & Liu Yang & Hongzan Jiao, 2022. "Changes in and Patterns of the Tradeoffs and Synergies of Production-Living-Ecological Space: A Case Study of Longli County, Guizhou Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Liang Zheng & Yajing Wang & Hui Yang & Yuzhe Bi & Lei Xu & Ying Wang, 2024. "Identifying Trade-Offs and Synergies of Production–Living–Ecological Functions and Their Drivers: The Case of Yangtze River Urban Agglomerations in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Gulmira Abbas & Alimujiang Kasimu, 2023. "Characteristics of Land-Use Carbon Emissions and Carbon Balance Zoning in the Economic Belt on the Northern Slope of Tianshan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-27, July.
    5. Xuanmiao Peng & Xiaoai Dai & Ryan Shi & Yujian Zheng & Xinyue Liu & Yuhe Xiao & Weile Li & Yang Zhang & Jue Wang & Huan Huang, 2024. "Investigating the Effects of Mining on Ecosystem Services in Panzhihua City: A Multi-Scenario Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, June.
    6. Yunrui Yang & Jiaying Zhang & Yi’na Hu, 2024. "Land Use Intensity Alters Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand as Well as Their Interaction: A Spatial Zoning Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-15, August.
    7. Zidao Lu & Maomao Zhang & Chunguang Hu & Lianlong Ma & Enqing Chen & Cheng Zhang & Guozhen Xia, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Changes and Influencing Factors of the Coupled Production–Living–Ecological Functions in the Yellow River Basin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, November.
    8. Kai Li & Ying Hou & Ruhong Xin & Yuejing Rong & Xiang Pan & Zihan Gao & Ting Wang & Bingyang Lyu & Baimeng Guo & Haocheng Wang & Xi Li, 2024. "Integrating Ecosystem Services and Health into Landscape Functional Zoning: A Case Study of the Jinan Southern Mountainous Area, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, September.
    9. Feng, Xinhui & Wang, Sensen & Li, Yan & Yang, Jiayu & Lei, Kaige & Yuan, Weikang, 2024. "Spatial heterogeneity and driving mechanisms of carbon emissions in urban expansion areas: A research framework coupled with patterns and functions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    10. Yang, Hao & Zou, Runyan & Hu, Yueming & Wang, Lu & Xie, Yingkai & Tan, Zhengxi & Zhu, Zhiqiang & Zhu, A.-Xing & Gong, Jianzhou & Mao, Xiaoyun, 2024. "Sustainable utilization of cultivated land resources based on "element coupling-function synergy" analytical framework: A case study of Guangdong, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    11. Yafang Zhao & Jiafu Liu & Jie Zhang & Xiaonan Zhang & Hongbo Li & Fengjie Gao & Yucheng Zhan, 2024. "Spatial Identification and Evaluation of Land Use Multifunctions and Their Interrelationships Improve Territorial Space Zoning Management in Harbin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
    12. Yu Fu & Qian Li & Julin Li & Kun Zeng & Liangsong Wang & Youhan Wang, 2024. "Multi-Scenario Simulation of the Production-Living-Ecological Spaces in Sichuan Province Based on the PLUS Model and Assessment of Its Ecological and Environmental Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-20, November.
    13. Wenhao Cheng & Caihong Ma & Tongsheng Li & Yuanyuan Liu, 2024. "Construction of Ecological Security Patterns and Evaluation of Ecological Network Stability under Multi-Scenario Simulation: A Case Study in Desert–Oasis Area of the Yellow River Basin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Yanbo, Qu & Shilei, Wang & Yaya, Tian & Guanghui, Jiang & Tao, Zhou & Liang, Meng, 2023. "Territorial spatial planning for regional high-quality development – An analytical framework for the identification, mediation and transmission of potential land utilization conflicts in the Yellow Ri," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    15. Jun Luo & Xuebing Zhang & Peiji Shi, 2022. "Land Use Multi-Functionality and Zoning Governance Strategy of Densely Populated Areas in the Upper Reaches of the Yellow River: A Case Study of the Lanzhou–Xining Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, June.
    16. Liangliang Zhou & Yishao Shi & Mengqiu Xie, 2024. "Urban Complexity and the Dynamic Evolution of Urban Land Functions in Yiwu City: A Micro-Analysis with Multi-Source Big Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-28, March.
    17. Li Wu & Jing Zhou & Binggeng Xie, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of Temporal-Spatial Variation on Mountain-Flatland Landscape Pattern in Karst Mountainous Areas of Southwest China: A Case Study of Yuxi City," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, February.
    18. Shuxuan Xing & Shengfu Yang & Haonan Sun & Yi Wang, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Changes of Terrestrial Carbon Storage in Rapidly Urbanizing Areas and Their Influencing Factors: A Case Study of Wuhan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Mengqi Xue & Hongwei Wang & Yiming Wei & Chen Ma & Yucong Yin, 2022. "Spatial Characteristics of Land Use Multifunctionality and Their Trade-Off/Synergy in Urumqi, China: Implication for Land Space Zoning Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.
    20. Jiao Chen & Liwei Zhang & Shan Zhao & Hua Zong, 2023. "Assessing Land-Use Conflict Potential and Its Correlation with LULC Based on the Perspective of Multi-Functionality and Landscape Complexity: The Case of Chengdu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11031-:d:1545009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.