IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p10840-d1541348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Infrastructure Decommissioning: A Brief Report on Embracing Future Generations’ Perspectives to Avoid Intergenerational Procrastination

Author

Listed:
  • Yoshinori Nakagawa

    (Graduate School of Global Environmental Studies, Sophia University, Tokyo 102-8554, Japan)

  • Masami Mori

    (Department of Social Relations, Kyoto Bunkyo University, Kyoto 611-0041, Japan)

  • Masahiko Yamada

    (Uji City Hall, Kyoto 611-8501, Japan)

  • Yuko Hata

    (Uji City Hall, Kyoto 611-8501, Japan)

  • Takayuki Sugimoto

    (Uji City Hall, Kyoto 611-8501, Japan)

  • Tatsuyoshi Saijo

    (International Academic Research Institute, Kyoto University of Advanced Science, Kyoto 621-8555, Japan)

Abstract

Infrastructure decommissioning refers to retiring infrastructure at the end of its useful life. Since all types of tangible infrastructure have a finite lifespan, the challenges of decommissioning are as significant as those of its creation. Despite this, there is an insufficient accumulation of knowledge regarding decommissioning. Given the intergenerational nature of this issue, the current brief report explores how the methodology of Future Design and its key concept, ‘imaginary future people’, can transform the perspectives of individuals involved in infrastructure decommissioning. In 2018, Uji City Hall in Kyoto Prefecture invited 32 citizens to participate in a series of 4 workshops contemplating the future of local communities and the 132 public assembly facilities, constituting 47.3% of the city’s public facilities. Future Design methodology and the concept of imaginary future people were adopted. Then the workshop discussions were transcribed and analyzed to compare how participants’ perspectives changed when they embraced the concept of imaginary future people, as opposed to when they did not. The analysis revealed that the concept encourages individuals to envision the future broadly. Based on this envisioning, they derive answers about the role of public assembly facilities, often considered peripheral. The paper concludes that Future Design is effective in exploring how ‘value’ can be created in decommissioning, motivating individuals to address infrastructure decommissioning. To elucidate the mechanisms by which Future Design produces such effects, further and more thorough research is required, which falls outside the scope of this report. Nevertheless, reporting that such an effect has been observed in a single case is considered to have both social and academic value.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoshinori Nakagawa & Masami Mori & Masahiko Yamada & Yuko Hata & Takayuki Sugimoto & Tatsuyoshi Saijo, 2024. "Infrastructure Decommissioning: A Brief Report on Embracing Future Generations’ Perspectives to Avoid Intergenerational Procrastination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10840-:d:1541348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/10840/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/10840/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Szumilas-Kowalczyk, H. & Pevzner, N. & Giedych, R., 2020. "Long-term visual impacts of aging infrastructure: Challenges of decommissioning wind power infrastructure and a survey of alternative strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 550-560.
    2. Tatsuyoshi Saijo, 2020. "Future Design: Bequeathing Sustainable Natural Environments and Sustainable Societies to Future Generations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-21, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raja R. Timilsina & Yoshinori Nakagawa & Koji Kotani, 2020. "Exploring the Possibility of Linking and Incorporating Future Design in Backcasting and Scenario Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Nik Masdek Nik Rozana & Wong Kelly Kai Seng & Mohd Nawi Nolila & Sharifuddin Juwaidah & Wong Wang Li, 2023. "Antecedents of sustainable food waste management behaviour: Empirical evidence from urban households in Malaysia," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 53-77, March.
    3. Toshiaki Hiromitsu & Yoko Kitakaji & Keishiro Hara & Tatsuyoshi Saijo, 2021. "What Do People Say When They Become “Future People”?―Positioning Imaginary Future Generations (IFGs) in General Rules for Good Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-27, June.
    4. Michinori Uwasu & Keishiro Hara & Masashi Kuroda & Ji Han, 2024. "Assessing the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Environmental Sustainability in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Rahman Md. Mostafizur & Khatun Mst. Asma & Moinul Islam & Tatsuyoshi Saijo & Koji Kotani, 2024. "Does future design induce people to make a persistent change to sustainable food consumption?," Working Papers SDES-2024-4, Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management, revised Jul 2024.
    6. Zhang Jingchao & Koji Kotani & Tatsuyoshi Saijo, 2021. "Are societies becoming proself? A topographical difference under fast urbanization in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(9), pages 12976-12993, September.
    7. Keishiro Hara & Iori Miura & Masanori Suzuki & Toshihiro Tanaka, 2023. "Designing research strategy and technology innovation for sustainability by adopting “imaginary future generations”—A case study using metallurgy," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(3-4), September.
    8. Keiichiro Kobayashi & Asako Chiba, 2020. "Intergenerational Bubbles of Beliefs for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Michinori Uwasu & Yusuke Kishita & Keishiro Hara & Yutaka Nomaguchi, 2020. "Citizen-Participatory Scenario Design Methodology with Future Design Approach: A Case Study of Visioning of a Low-Carbon Society in Suita City, Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, June.
    10. Kentaro Miyake & Yoichi Hizen & Tatsuyoshi Saijo, 2023. "Proxy Voting for Future Generations: A Laboratory Experiment Using the General Public," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, September.
    11. Tatsuyoshi Saijo, 2022. "Future Design for Sustainable Nature and Societies," Working Papers SDES-2022-1, Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management, revised Jan 2022.
    12. Leite, Gustavo de Novaes Pires & Weschenfelder, Franciele & Farias, João Gabriel de & Kamal Ahmad, Muhammad, 2022. "Economic and sensitivity analysis on wind farm end-of-life strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    13. de Simón-Martín, Miguel & Ciria-Garcés, Tomás & Rosales-Asensio, Enrique & González-Martínez, Alberto, 2022. "Multi-dimensional barrier identification for wind farm repowering in Spain through an expert judgment approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    14. Raja Rajendra Timilsina & Yoshinori Nakagawa & Yoshio Komijo & Koji Kotani & Tatsuyoshi Saijo, 2021. "Imaginary future generations: A deliberative approach for intergenerational sustainability dilemma," Working Papers SDES-2021-12, Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management, revised Nov 2021.
    15. Llinos Haf Spencer & Mary Lynch & Gwenlli Mair Thomas & Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, 2023. "Intergenerational Deliberations for Long Term Sustainability," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, February.
    16. Rahman Md. Mostafizur & Khatun Mst. Asma & Moinul Islam & Koji Kotani, 2024. "Drivers for sustainable food purchase intentions: Prosocial attitudes for future generations and environmental concerns," Working Papers SDES-2024-5, Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management, revised Nov 2024.
    17. Tatsuyoshi Saijo, 2024. "Futurability, Survivability, and the Non‐Steady State in the Intergenerational Sustainability Dilemma," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    18. Keishiro Hara & Yukari Fuchigami & Takanobu Arai & Yutaka Nomaguchi, 2024. "Compatible effects of adopting imaginary future generations and systems thinking in exploring future challenges: Evidence from a deliberation experiment," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(4), December.
    19. Pankaj Koirala & Raja Rajendra Timilsina & Koji Kotani, 2021. "Deliberative Forms of Democracy and Intergenerational Sustainability Dilemma," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, July.
    20. Isabel C. Gil-García & Ana Fernández-Guillamón & M. Socorro García-Cascales & Angel Molina-García, 2021. "A Multi-Factorial Review of Repowering Wind Generation Strategies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:10840-:d:1541348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.