IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10720-d1538306.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Obligation to Opportunity: Exploring the Symbiosis of Corporate Social Responsibility, Green Innovation, and Organizational Agility in the Quest for Environmental Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Qurat-ul-ain Abro

    (Business School, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Azhar Ali Laghari

    (College of Resources and Environment, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China)

  • Jianhua Yin

    (Business School, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Muhammad Qasim

    (Business School, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Azhar Hussain

    (Business School, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Azra Soomro

    (School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Faiza Hisbani

    (School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Anila Ashraf

    (Business School, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China)

Abstract

This study investigates the intricate relationship between CSR, green innovation, and environmental performance within the context of China’s manufacturing industries. Given the pressing environmental challenges faced by this sector, understanding how CSR practices correlate with sustainable innovations is critical for stakeholders aiming to enhance environmental outcomes. This was a survey-based study using a questionnaire and the five-point Likert scale; items were adopted from previous studies. Sampling was drawn through random sampling. Utilizing a sample of 327 respondents, this research employs SPSS and Structural Equation Modeling with Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) as analytical tools. The findings reveal a robust positive correlation between CSR practices and green innovation, as evidenced by a path coefficient of 0.704. These data support the stakeholder theory, which posits that organizations attentive to stakeholder expectations are more inclined to adopt sustainable practices. Furthermore, this study underscores the mediating role of green innovation in the relationship between CSR and environmental performance, highlighting its importance in aligning organizational strategies with sustainability-oriented stakeholder interests. This conclusion aligns with the existing literature emphasizing CSR’s significance in improving environmental performance through innovative approaches. However, an unexpected finding emerged: there exists a weak negative relationship between green innovation and organizational agility (−0.080). This suggests that, while firms strive for sustainable innovations, they may inadvertently compromise their flexibility in responding to evolving market demands. By addressing these dynamics, this research contributes valuable insights into how CSR can effectively spur green innovation and promote sustainable practices within China’s manufacturing sector. This study fills a gap in the existing literature by elucidating the mechanisms that connect CSR with enhanced environmental performance while also recognizing the potential trade-offs associated with innovation strategies. Also, the exploration of agility, which is least investigated, can also open various doors towards sustainability and the adaptation of new changes. Future research is encouraged to further explore these relationships across different industries and delve deeper into the mechanisms linking CSR to improved environmental outcomes, ultimately guiding organizations in balancing sustainability efforts with market responsiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Qurat-ul-ain Abro & Azhar Ali Laghari & Jianhua Yin & Muhammad Qasim & Azhar Hussain & Azra Soomro & Faiza Hisbani & Anila Ashraf, 2024. "Obligation to Opportunity: Exploring the Symbiosis of Corporate Social Responsibility, Green Innovation, and Organizational Agility in the Quest for Environmental Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-22, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10720-:d:1538306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10720/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10720/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodrigo Lozano, 2015. "A Holistic Perspective on Corporate Sustainability Drivers," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1), pages 32-44, January.
    2. John Hulland, 1999. "Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 195-204, February.
    3. Olga Hawn & Ioannis Ioannou, 2016. "Mind the gap: The interplay between external and internal actions in the case of corporate social responsibility," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(13), pages 2569-2588, December.
    4. Fabio Zagonari, 2020. "Environmental sustainability is not worth pursuing unless it is achieved for ethical reasons," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-8, December.
    5. Mingfeng Tang & Grace Walsh & Daniel Lerner & Markus A. Fitza & Qiaohua Li, 2018. "Green Innovation, Managerial Concern and Firm Performance: An Empirical Study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 39-51, January.
    6. Kunapatarawong, Rasi & Martínez-Ros, Ester, 2016. "Towards green growth: How does green innovation affect employment?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 1218-1232.
    7. Md. Abu Issa Gazi & Md. Motaher Hossain & Shanta Islam & Abdullah Al Masud & Mohammad Bin Amin & Abdul Rahman bin S Senathirajah & Masuk Abdullah, 2024. "CSR and Sustainable Environmental Performance: An Exploration of Mediating and Moderating Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-23, September.
    8. Kraus, Sascha & Rehman, Shafique Ur & García, F. Javier Sendra, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: The mediating role of environmental strategy and green innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    9. Yixuan Chen & Shanyue Jin, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Green Technology Innovation: The Moderating Role of Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    10. Wenhao Song & Hongyan Yu, 2018. "Green Innovation Strategy and Green Innovation: The Roles of Green Creativity and Green Organizational Identity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(2), pages 135-150, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fang, Zhenming & Kong, Xiaoran & Sensoy, Ahmet & Cui, Xin & Cheng, Feiyang, 2021. "Government’s awareness of Environmental protection and corporate green innovation: A natural experiment from the new environmental protection law in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 294-312.
    2. Morteza Akbari & Hamid Padash & Zahra Shahabaldini Parizi & Haniye Rezaei & Elmira Shahriari & Ala Khosravani, 2022. "A bibliometric review of green innovation research: identifying knowledge domain and network," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 3993-4023, December.
    3. Zhongfei Chen & Yu Xiao & Kangqi Jiang, 2023. "Corporate green innovation and stock liquidity in China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(S1), pages 1381-1415, April.
    4. Lin, Woon Leong & Ho, Jo Ann & Sambasivan, Murali & Yip, Nick & Mohamed, Azali Bin, 2021. "Influence of green innovation strategy on brand value: The role of marketing capability and R&D intensity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    5. Dan Huang & Jie Cheng & Xiaofeng Quan & Yanling Wu, 2024. "Managerial attention to environmental protection and corporate green innovation," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 1047-1081, October.
    6. Xinyue Hao & Fanglin Chen & Zhongfei Chen, 2022. "Does green innovation increase enterprise value?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1232-1247, March.
    7. Hermundsdottir, Fanny & Haneberg, Dag Håkon & Aspelund, Arild, 2022. "Analyzing the impact of COVID-19 on environmental innovations in manufacturing firms," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    8. Mercedes Úbeda‐García & Bartolome Marco‐Lajara & Patrocinio C. Zaragoza‐Sáez & Encarnación Manresa‐Marhuenda & Esther Poveda‐Pareja, 2022. "Green ambidexterity and environmental performance: The role of green human resources," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 32-45, January.
    9. Song, Yang & Pang, Xiaoqian & Zhang, Zhiyuan & Sahut, Jean-Michel, 2024. "Can the new energy demonstration city policy promote corporate green innovation capability?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    10. Xiaoyang Xu & Muhammad Imran & Muhammad Ayaz & Sonia Lohana, 2022. "The Mediating Role of Green Technology Innovation with Corporate Social Responsibility, Firm Financial, and Environmental Performance: The Case of Chinese Manufacturing Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Hao, Xiaoli & Miao, Erxiang & Sun, Qingyu & Li, Ke & Wen, Shufang & Xue, Yan, 2024. "The impact of digital government on corporate green innovation: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    12. Achi, Awele & Adeola, Ogechi & Achi, Francis Chukwuedo, 2022. "CSR and green process innovation as antecedents of micro, small, and medium enterprise performance: Moderating role of perceived environmental volatility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 771-781.
    13. Philipp Haessler, 2020. "Strategic Decisions between Short-Term Profit and Sustainability," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-31, September.
    14. Pelin Demirel & Effie Kesidou, 2019. "Sustainability‐oriented capabilities for eco‐innovation: Meeting the regulatory, technology, and market demands," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 847-857, July.
    15. Kopyrina, Olga & Wu, Kai & Ying, Zhanyu, 2023. "Greening through central inspection: The role of legitimacy pressure and risk-taking," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    16. Di Luan & Hongjun Cao & Tongkun Qu, 2023. "How Does Corporate Green Innovation Strategy Translate into Green Innovation Performance Based on Chain Mediation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
    17. Yuan Li & Nan Huang & Yang Zhao, 2022. "The Impact of Green Innovation on Enterprise Green Economic Efficiency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-26, December.
    18. Teng, Zhong-lu & Guo, Cheng & Zhao, Qiuhan & Mubarik, Muhammad Shujaat, 2023. "Antecedents of green process innovation adoption: An AHP analysis of China's gas sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    19. Chotia, Varun & Cheng, Yue & Agarwal, Reeti & Vishnoi, Sushant Kumar, 2024. "AI-enabled Green Business Strategy: Path to carbon neutrality via environmental performance and green process innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    20. Larissa Marchiori Pacheco & Marlon Fernandes Rodrigues Alves & Lara Bartocci Liboni, 2018. "Green absorptive capacity: A mediation‐moderation model of knowledge for innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1502-1513, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10720-:d:1538306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.