IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10684-d1537622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evolutionary Stability Study of Zero-Carbon Transition for Shipping Enterprises Considering Dynamic Penalty and Carbon Quota Trading Mechanisms

Author

Listed:
  • Zhibo He

    (Department of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Linghai Road No. 1th, Ganjingzi District, Dalian 116026, China)

  • Dan Wang

    (National Key Laboratory of Waterway Traffic Control, Shanghai Research Institute of Shipping, 600 Minsheng Road, China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone, Shanghai 200135, China)

  • Jiawei Li

    (Department of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Linghai Road No. 1th, Ganjingzi District, Dalian 116026, China)

  • Wanwei Fang

    (Department of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Linghai Road No. 1th, Ganjingzi District, Dalian 116026, China)

  • Yilin Yang

    (National Key Laboratory of Waterway Traffic Control, Shanghai Research Institute of Shipping, 600 Minsheng Road, China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone, Shanghai 200135, China)

  • Mingjun Ji

    (Department of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Linghai Road No. 1th, Ganjingzi District, Dalian 116026, China)

Abstract

The carbon quota trading mechanism is considered one of the most effective incentives for carbon reduction to address global climate change. Currently, the EU has adopted this mechanism to intervene in the zero-carbon transition of shipping companies. Unlike other businesses, the shipping market experiences cyclical changes and high uncertainty, with many factors and complex systems involved in the zero-carbon transition process. Research on the impact of dynamic penalty mechanisms combined with government incentive policies on the zero-carbon transition of shipping companies is relatively scarce. To explore this process under such mechanisms, an evolutionary game model of shipping companies’ zero-carbon transition considering dynamic penalties and carbon quota trading was constructed. The model analyzes the effects of factors such as carbon trading prices, emission reductions resulting from zero-carbon transition, government supervision costs, supervision intensity, subsidy values, and penalty caps on the transition process and performs a simulation analysis. The results indicate the following: (1) Under dynamic penalty mechanisms, the evolutionary trajectories of both government and shipping companies spiral towards a unique evolutionary stable strategy, addressing the shortcomings of static penalty mechanisms. (2) Government supervision costs negatively impact the zero-carbon transition of shipping companies, while supervision intensity has a positive effect. Government subsidies positively affect transition strategies but have a minor impact. Increasing the penalty cap benefits the zero-carbon transition of companies. (3) There is a critical point for carbon trading prices corresponding to changes in zero-carbon transition strategies, providing a basis for companies to decide whether to buy or sell carbon emission trading rights. Additionally, government regulatory changes lag behind the changes in companies’ zero-carbon transition behaviors. The results provide significant insights for government strategy formulation and investment in zero-carbon transition under the carbon quota trading mechanism.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhibo He & Dan Wang & Jiawei Li & Wanwei Fang & Yilin Yang & Mingjun Ji, 2024. "An Evolutionary Stability Study of Zero-Carbon Transition for Shipping Enterprises Considering Dynamic Penalty and Carbon Quota Trading Mechanisms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-23, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10684-:d:1537622
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10684/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10684/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Bin & Xu, Liang, 2013. "Multi-item production planning with carbon cap and trade mechanism," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 118-127.
    2. Yenipazarli, Arda, 2016. "Managing new and remanufactured products to mitigate environmental damage under emissions regulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(1), pages 117-130.
    3. Alegoz, Mehmet & Kaya, Onur & Bayindir, Z. Pelin, 2021. "A comparison of pure manufacturing and hybrid manufacturing–remanufacturing systems under carbon tax policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 161-173.
    4. Zhang, Ling & Zhang, Zheng, 2022. "Dynamic analysis of the decision of authorized remanufacturing supply chain affected by government subsidies under cap-and-trade policies," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    5. Xu, Xiaoping & He, Ping & Xu, Hao & Zhang, Quanpeng, 2017. "Supply chain coordination with green technology under cap-and-trade regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 433-442.
    6. I-Hsuan Hong & Pin-Chun Chen & Hsien-Ting Yu, 2016. "The effects of government subsidies on decentralised reverse supply chains," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(13), pages 3962-3977, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Lei & Hu, Yijuan & Huang, Lijuan, 2020. "Collecting mode selection in a remanufacturing supply chain under cap-and-trade regulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 480-496.
    2. Liang Shen & Fei Lin & T. C. E. Cheng, 2022. "Low-Carbon Transition Models of High Carbon Supply Chains under the Mixed Carbon Cap-and-Trade and Carbon Tax Policy in the Carbon Neutrality Era," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Luo, Ruiling & Zhou, Li & Song, Yang & Fan, Tijun, 2022. "Evaluating the impact of carbon tax policy on manufacturing and remanufacturing decisions in a closed-loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    4. Xu, Song & Govindan, Kannan & Wang, Wanru & Yang, Wenting, 2024. "Supply chain management under cap-and-trade regulation: A literature review and research opportunities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    5. Wen-Hsien Tsai & Shang-Yu Lai & Chu-Lun Hsieh, 2023. "Exploring the impact of different carbon emission cost models on corporate profitability," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(1), pages 41-74, March.
    6. Zhaofu Hong & Hao Wang & Yeming Gong, 2019. "Green product design considering functional-product reference," Post-Print hal-02312293, HAL.
    7. Pazoki, Mostafa & Samarghandi, Hamed, 2020. "Take-back regulation: Remanufacturing or Eco-design?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    8. Chen, Wenbo, 2018. "Retailer-driven carbon emission abatement with consumer environmental awareness and carbon tax: Revenue-sharing versus Cost-sharingAuthor-Name: Yang, Huixiao," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 179-191.
    9. Yanli Fang & Zhuoyi Ren & Fang Yang, 2023. "The Impact of Carbon Allowance Allocation Rules on Remanufacturing Decisions in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-24, June.
    10. Yang Lv & Xinhua Bi & Quanxi Li & Haowei Zhang, 2022. "Research on Closed-Loop Supply Chain Decision Making and Recycling Channel Selection under Carbon Allowance and Carbon Trading," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    11. Fu, Shuaishuai & Chen, Weida & Ding, Junfei & Zhang, Guoqing, 2023. "Is carbon asset pledge financing contributing to the operation of emission-dependent engineering machinery remanufacturing with emission abatement?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    12. Yuqing Hu & Lijun Meng & Jingya Xue & Hongying Xia, 2023. "Authorization or Outsourcing: Considering the Contrast/Assimilation Effect and Network Externality of Remanufactured Products under Government Subsidy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-27, July.
    13. Yunting Feng & Yong Geng & Ge Zhao & Mengya Li, 2022. "Carbon Emission Constraint Policy in an OEM and Outsourcing Remanufacturer Supply Chain with Consumer Preferences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-16, April.
    14. Ata Allah Taleizadeh & Milad Shahriari & Shib Sankar Sana, 2021. "Pricing and Coordination Strategies in a Dual Channel Supply Chain with Green Production under Cap and Trade Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Weiling Wang & Yongjian Wang & Xiaoqing Zhang & Dalin Zhang, 2021. "Effects of Government Subsidies on Production and Emissions Reduction Decisions under Carbon Tax Regulation and Consumer Low-Carbon Awareness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-17, October.
    16. Dou, Guowei & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Does implementing trade-in and green technology together benefit the environment?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(2), pages 517-533.
    17. Yonghong Cheng & Zhongkai Xiong & Qinglin Luo, 2018. "Joint Pricing and Product Carbon Footprint Decisions and Coordination of Supply Chain with Cap-and-Trade Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-24, February.
    18. Doo-Ho Lee & Jong-Chul Yoon, 2022. "Decisions on Pricing, Sustainability Effort, and Carbon Cap under Wholesale Price and Cost-Sharing Contracts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.
    19. Liu, Peide & Li, Xina & Li, Jialu, 2023. "Competitive firms’ low-carbon technology diffusion under pollution regulations: A network-based evolutionary analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    20. Zhitao Xu & Adel Elomri & Shaligram Pokharel & Fatih Mutlu, 2019. "The Design of Green Supply Chains under Carbon Policies: A Literature Review of Quantitative Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10684-:d:1537622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.