IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10610-d1536003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Sustainable Intelligent Drying Wardrobe Design Strategy Based on Importance–Performance Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Huang

    (College of Fine Arts, Southeast University, Nanjing 211100, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Xiang Li

    (College of Fine Arts, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Feng Gan

    (College of Fine Arts, Southeast University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Tianwei Gu

    (School of Art and Design, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

Abstract

Sustainable design concepts are design concepts that the United Nations and China have been promoting that aim to achieve environmental sustainability, social sustainability, and economic sustainability. In recent years, with the rise of intelligent drying wardrobes, more and more scholars have applied the concept of sustainable design to the theoretical research and design practices of intelligent drying wardrobes. But most of them focus on the research and practice of a certain functional module, while less focus on end users. This study examines users’ perceptions of the functional modules of intelligent drying wardrobes through a questionnaire. It focuses on environmental, social, and economic sustainability. The research also measures users’ satisfaction and the importance of these modules using IPA. From the perspective of end users, the results show that social sustainability is the best option, followed by economic sustainability and environmental sustainability. From the enterprise point of view, the high priority of social sustainability in terms of user’s needs is highlighted. However, in response to sustainable development policy, environmental sustainability is taken as the second most important guiding factor for the development of intelligent drying wardrobe functional modules. This paper fills the current research gap on the differences in users’ perceptions of intelligent drying wardrobe design modules and prioritizes users’ perception decisions on functional modules from the perspective of sustainability, so as to provide some reference for enterprise production.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Huang & Xiang Li & Feng Gan & Tianwei Gu, 2024. "Research on Sustainable Intelligent Drying Wardrobe Design Strategy Based on Importance–Performance Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10610-:d:1536003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10610/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10610/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haeun Bang & Jin Su, 2022. "Who Uses Virtual Wardrobes? Investigating the Role of Consumer Traits in the Intention to Adopt Virtual Wardrobes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Erminia D’Itria & Xue Pei & Paola Bertola, 2024. "Designing Sustainability Today: An Analytical Framework for a Design for Sustainability Model in European Fashion and Furniture Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-38, April.
    3. Lucia Corsini & James Moultrie, 2021. "What Is Design for Social Sustainability? A Systematic Literature Review for Designers of Product-Service Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Ling Zhu & Yuqi Yan & Jiufang Lv, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Current Knowledge Structure and Research Progress Related to Sustainable Furniture Design Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, May.
    5. Yali Wang & Yuchen Xi & Xinxiong Liu & Yan Gan, 2024. "Exploring the Dual Potential of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Content in the Esthetic Reproduction and Sustainable Innovative Design of Ming-Style Furniture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daria Minashkina & Ari Happonen, 2023. "Warehouse Management Systems for Social and Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-33, July.
    2. Mojtaba Ashour & Amir Mahdiyar & Syarmila Hany Haron, 2021. "A Comprehensive Review of Deterrents to the Practice of Sustainable Interior Architecture and Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Georgi V. Georgiev & Vijayakumar Nanjappan, 2023. "Sustainability Considerations in Digital Fabrication Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Gwen Klerks & Geertje Slingerland & Indre Kalinauskaite & Nicolai Brodersen Hansen & Ben Schouten, 2022. "When Reality Kicks In: Exploring the Influence of Local Context on Community-Based Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Wenxin Deng & Hong Lin & Mu Jiang, 2023. "Research on Bamboo Furniture Design Based on D4S (Design for Sustainability)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Lyndsay Mesjar & Karen Cross & Yang Jiang & Josie Steed, 2023. "The Intersection of Fashion, Immersive Technology, and Sustainability: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Salman Alfarisi & Yuya Mitake & Yusuke Tsutsui & Hanfei Wang & Yoshiki Shimomura, 2023. "Nurture: A Novel Approach to PSS-Rebound Effect Identification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, April.
    8. Joana Costa & Diana Cancela & João Reis, 2021. "Neverland or Tomorrowland? Addressing (In)compatibility among the SDG Pillars in Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Meng-Xun Ho & Hideyoshi Yanagisawa, 2023. "Design for Well-Being and Sustainability: A Conceptual Framework of the Peer-to-Peer Sharing and Reuse Platform in the Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10610-:d:1536003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.