IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i18p10403-d638124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comprehensive Review of Deterrents to the Practice of Sustainable Interior Architecture and Design

Author

Listed:
  • Mojtaba Ashour

    (School of Housing, Building and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor 11800, Penang, Malaysia)

  • Amir Mahdiyar

    (School of Housing, Building and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor 11800, Penang, Malaysia)

  • Syarmila Hany Haron

    (School of Housing, Building and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor 11800, Penang, Malaysia)

Abstract

The interior environment as the place where people spend nearly 95% of their time in, has recently received considerable attention within the domain of the built environment. The concept of Sustainable Interior Architecture and Design (SIAD) and its significance have been recognized given its potential for energy conservation, and its impacts on occupants’ satisfaction, comfort, as well as their physical and psychological wellbeing. Although the adoption of SIAD is crucial in achieving the sustainable development goals, its practice is still hindered by numerous deterrents. A number of studies have reported on these deterrents; however, there is no comprehensive review of the literature on this topic. Thus, as a first step toward addressing the present gap, this article provides a two decade (2000–2021) systematic review of the relevant literature that investigates a total of 51 publications. Furthermore, a scientometric analysis was conducted, and the co-citation and co-occurrence of journals and keywords were analyzed to illustrate the scientific landscape. A comprehensive summary table is provided consisting of 61 deterrents to the practice of SIAD that are categorized into five main categories: (1) economic; (2) attitude, knowledge, and awareness; (3) market, information, and technology; (4) education and training; as well as (5) government and professional bodies. Finally, the findings are deliberated upon and directions for future research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Mojtaba Ashour & Amir Mahdiyar & Syarmila Hany Haron, 2021. "A Comprehensive Review of Deterrents to the Practice of Sustainable Interior Architecture and Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10403-:d:638124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10403/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10403/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Park, June Young & Nagy, Zoltan, 2018. "Comprehensive analysis of the relationship between thermal comfort and building control research - A data-driven literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2664-2679.
    2. Yan Ning & Yadi Li & Shuangshuang Yang & Chuanjing Ju, 2016. "Exploring Socio-Technical Features of Green Interior Design of Residential Buildings: Indicators, Interdependence and Embeddedness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Magdalena Celadyn, 2020. "Integrative Design Classes for Environmental Sustainability of Interior Architectural Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Lokman I. Meho & Yvonne Rogers, 2008. "Citation counting, citation ranking, and h‐index of human‐computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 59(11), pages 1711-1726, September.
    5. Liu, Guo & Li, Xiaohu & Tan, Yongtao & Zhang, Guomin, 2020. "Building green retrofit in China: Policies, barriers and recommendations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    6. Hyun Joo Kwon & Mira Ahn, 2019. "Boomers’ Intention to Choose Healthy Housing Materials: An Application of the Health Belief Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-13, September.
    7. Seyed Mohammad Hossein Zakeri & Amir Mahdiyar, 2020. "The Hindrances to Green Roof Adoption in a Semi-Arid Climate Condition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Lucia Corsini & James Moultrie, 2021. "What Is Design for Social Sustainability? A Systematic Literature Review for Designers of Product-Service Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Fajer Al Tawayha & Luis Braganca & Ricardo Mateus, 2019. "Contribution of the Vernacular Architecture to the Sustainability: A Comparative Study between the Contemporary Areas and the Old Quarter of a Mediterranean City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Giulia Wally Scurati & Marco Bertoni & Serena Graziosi & Francesco Ferrise, 2021. "Exploring the Use of Virtual Reality to Support Environmentally Sustainable Behavior: A Framework to Design Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mousa S. Mohsen & Rana Matarneh, 2023. "Exploring the Interior Designers’ Attitudes toward Sustainable Interior Design Practices: The Case of Jordan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-23, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mennat-Allah El-Husseiny & Hamdy El-Setouhy, 2022. "Reviving Low-Tech Modes of Construction as a Method for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Hui Zhu & Shuenn-Ren Liou & Pi-Cheng Chen & Xia-Yun He & Meng-Lin Sui, 2024. "Carbon Emissions Reduction of a Circular Architectural Practice: A Study on a Reversible Design Pavilion Using Recycled Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Deming Lin & Tianhui Gong & Wenbin Liu & Martin Meyer, 2020. "An entropy-based measure for the evolution of h index research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2283-2298, December.
    4. Liu, Yang & Pedrycz, Witold & Deveci, Muhammet & Chen, Zhen-Song, 2024. "BIM-based building performance assessment of green buildings - A case study from China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
    5. Yu Cao & Cong Xu & Syahrul Nizam Kamaruzzaman & Nur Mardhiyah Aziz, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Green Building Development in China: Advantages, Challenges and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-29, September.
    6. Linyan Chen & Xin Gao & Shitao Gong & Zhou Li, 2020. "Regionalization of Green Building Development in China: A Comprehensive Evaluation Model Based on the Catastrophe Progression Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-22, July.
    7. Chuhan Chen & Syarmila Hany Haron, 2023. "The Influence of Multistakeholder Value Cognition and Risk Attitudes on Sustainable Interior Landscape Design Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, February.
    8. Daria Minashkina & Ari Happonen, 2023. "Warehouse Management Systems for Social and Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-33, July.
    9. García-Pérez, Miguel A., 2011. "Strange attractors in the Web of Science database," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 214-218.
    10. Iolanda L. Chamusca & Cristiano V. Ferreira & Thiago B. Murari & Antonio L. Apolinario & Ingrid Winkler, 2023. "Towards Sustainable Virtual Reality: Gathering Design Guidelines for Intuitive Authoring Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    11. Jakub Rybacki & Dobromił Serwa, 2021. "What Makes a Successful Scientist in a Central Bank? Evidence From the RePEc Database," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 13(3), pages 331-357, September.
    12. Salih Selek & Ayman Saleh, 2014. "Use of h index and g index for American academic psychiatry," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 99(2), pages 541-548, May.
    13. Hyun Joo Kwon & Mira Ahn & Jiyun Kang, 2021. "The Effects of Knowledge Types on Consumer Decision Making for Non-Toxic Housing Materials and Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, October.
    14. Omar Mubin & Abdullah Al Mahmud & Muneeb Ahmad, 2017. "HCI down under: reflecting on a decade of the OzCHI conference," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(1), pages 367-382, July.
    15. Mingers, John & Yang, Liying, 2017. "Evaluating journal quality: A review of journal citation indicators and ranking in business and management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(1), pages 323-337.
    16. Frode Eika Sandnes, 2021. "A bibliometric study of human–computer interaction research activity in the Nordic-Baltic Eight countries," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(6), pages 4733-4767, June.
    17. Nobuyuki Shirakawa & Takao Furukawa & Minoru Nomura & Kumi Okuwada, 2012. "Global competition and technological transition in electrical, electronic, information and communication engineering: quantitative analysis of periodicals and conference proceedings of the IEEE," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(3), pages 895-910, June.
    18. Sheng-Yuan Wang & Kyung-Tae Lee & Ju-Hyung Kim, 2022. "Green Retrofitting Simulation for Sustainable Commercial Buildings in China Using a Proposed Multi-Agent Evolutionary Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-32, June.
    19. Marek Gągolewski & Przemysław Grzegorzewski, 2009. "A geometric approach to the construction of scientific impact indices," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 81(3), pages 617-634, December.
    20. Osman Issah & Lúcia Lima Rodrigues, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Tax Aggressiveness: A Scientometric Analysis of the Existing Literature to Map the Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10403-:d:638124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.