IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10606-d1535990.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effectiveness of Operational Residual Risk Assessment: The Case of General Aviation Organizations in Enhancing Flight Safety in Alignment with Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Tomasz Ewertowski

    (Faculty of Engineering Management, Poznan University of Technology, 2 Prof. Rychlewskiego Str., 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Marcin Berlik

    (Faculty of Engineering Management, Poznan University of Technology, 2 Prof. Rychlewskiego Str., 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Sławińska

    (Faculty of Engineering Management, Poznan University of Technology, 2 Prof. Rychlewskiego Str., 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

Abstract

Operational risk management (ORM) is crucial for every aviation organization. The assessment of operational risk (OR) is a critical area of study, as organizations must continuously evaluate and mitigate potential risks to maintain high levels of performance and safety. The motivation for writing this paper was to address the cognitive gap identified through literature analysis. The aim of this paper is to assess the effectiveness of operational residual risk assessment in general aviation (GA) organizations, with a specific focus on its role within the decision-making process to enhance flight safety in line with sustainability. By addressing a cognitive gap identified in the literature, this study seeks to determine whether current risk management practices adequately assess and mitigate residual risks, especially in organizations where operational risk is inherently high. Based on a literature review, the authors present adopted concepts of ORM and OR. The survey methodology involved a questionnaire on OR assessment, consisting of 32 questions completed by respondents twice—before and after 63 series of flights. The survey was carried out across two groups with significantly varying levels of flying experience (students and instructor pilots), with a particular focus on the influence of human factors. The conclusions are based on a comparative analysis of the difference in the results obtained after and before the series of flights in both surveyed groups. The survey was conducted in three selected general aviation organizations in Poland using nonprobability convenience sampling. The results demonstrate an overall significant underestimation of OR in both student and instructor groups. Therefore, it can be concluded that operational risk assessment in the selected organizations was not sufficiently effective. Additionally, it was shown that staff experience affected the effectiveness of OR assessment. Moreover, this study identified specific aspects of operational risk that were most underestimated. By addressing the cognitive gap, this study enhances both the theoretical and practical understanding of residual risk management, particularly in relation to safety and efficient resource use in aviation. It also offers the Operational Residual Risk Underestimation Index (ORRUI) as an actionable parameter developed to quantify and standardize the level of underestimation of operational residual risks in civil aviation.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomasz Ewertowski & Marcin Berlik & Małgorzata Sławińska, 2024. "The Effectiveness of Operational Residual Risk Assessment: The Case of General Aviation Organizations in Enhancing Flight Safety in Alignment with Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-19, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10606-:d:1535990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10606/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10606/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tomasz Ewertowski & Patryk Kuźmiński, 2024. "The Safety Management and Organizational Resilience System Maturity of Aviation Organizations during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparison of Two Approaches to Achieving Safety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Imad A. Moosa, 2007. "Operational Risk: A Survey," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 167-200, November.
    3. Tomasz Ewertowski & Marcin Butlewski, 2022. "Managerial Perception of Risk in an Organization in a Post-COVID-19 Work Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-18, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomasz Ewertowski & Buse Çisil Güldoğuş & Semih Kuter & Süreyya Akyüz & Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber & Joanna Sadłowska-Wrzesińska & Elżbieta Racek, 2024. "The use of machine learning techniques for assessing the potential of organizational resilience," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 32(3), pages 685-710, September.
    2. Hu, Mingya & Zhang, Yongjie & Feng, Xu & Xiong, Xiong, 2024. "How technological innovation influence operational risk: Evidence from banks in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    3. Tomasz Ewertowski & Patryk Kuźmiński, 2024. "The Safety Management and Organizational Resilience System Maturity of Aviation Organizations during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparison of Two Approaches to Achieving Safety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10606-:d:1535990. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.