IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10482-d1532913.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Future Installation, Production and Global Trade of Clean Energy Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Katharina Hembach-Stunden

    (Gesellschaft für Wirtschaftliche Strukturforschung (GWS) mbH, 49080 Osnabrück, Germany)

  • Maximilian Banning

    (Gesellschaft für Wirtschaftliche Strukturforschung (GWS) mbH, 49080 Osnabrück, Germany)

  • Lisa Becker

    (Gesellschaft für Wirtschaftliche Strukturforschung (GWS) mbH, 49080 Osnabrück, Germany)

  • Christian Lutz

    (Gesellschaft für Wirtschaftliche Strukturforschung (GWS) mbH, 49080 Osnabrück, Germany)

  • Patrick Matschoss

    (IZES gGmbH—Institut für ZukunftsEnergie- und Stoffstromsysteme (IZES), 10117 Berlin, Germany
    IZES gGmbH—Institut für ZukunftsEnergie- und Stoffstromsysteme (IZES), 66115 Saarbrücken, Germany)

  • Uwe Klann

    (IZES gGmbH—Institut für ZukunftsEnergie- und Stoffstromsysteme (IZES), 10117 Berlin, Germany
    IZES gGmbH—Institut für ZukunftsEnergie- und Stoffstromsysteme (IZES), 66115 Saarbrücken, Germany)

  • Juri Horst

    (IZES gGmbH—Institut für ZukunftsEnergie- und Stoffstromsysteme (IZES), 10117 Berlin, Germany
    IZES gGmbH—Institut für ZukunftsEnergie- und Stoffstromsysteme (IZES), 66115 Saarbrücken, Germany)

Abstract

While transitioning to clean energy technologies offers countries economic advantages, the risk of “low carbon leakage” arises if production shifts to more favorable locations. We conducted a scenario analysis to examine potential shifts in production and trade patterns of clean energy technologies. Our novel empirical approach combines the global macroeconometric model GINFORS-E with a newly developed gravity trade model and integrates a socio-political analysis based on a Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) framework, innovatively augmented by quantifiable indicators. The MLP-analysis defines the expansion paths of clean energy technologies in an alternative scenario, allowing us to incorporate political and social dynamics into our analysis. The baseline scenario is based on announced pledges. For established technologies like photovoltaics, we observe minimal shifts in global trade shares as production capacities approach their limits, signaling market saturation. Conversely, emerging technologies like hydrogen electrolyzers display greater shifts, highlighting potential for market disruption and increased risk of low carbon leakage. While adopting clean technologies in individual countries lead to sector-specific changes, broader macroeconomic impacts appear constrained by existing market structures and path dependencies. Sensitivity analyses suggest that component-specific price changes influence trade and production. Expanding our approach to additional technologies and countries remains challenging due to data limitations.

Suggested Citation

  • Katharina Hembach-Stunden & Maximilian Banning & Lisa Becker & Christian Lutz & Patrick Matschoss & Uwe Klann & Juri Horst, 2024. "Future Installation, Production and Global Trade of Clean Energy Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-25, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10482-:d:1532913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10482/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10482/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James E. Anderson & Eric van Wincoop, 2003. "Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(1), pages 170-192, March.
    2. Viebahn, Peter (Ed.) & Zelt, Ole (Ed.) & Fischedick, Manfred (Ed.) & Wietschel, Martin (Ed.) & Hirzel, Simon (Ed.) & Horst, Juri (Ed.), 2018. "Technologien für die Energiewende: Technologiebericht - Band 2. Teilbericht 2 zum Teilprojekt A im Rahmen des strategischen BMWi-Leitprojekts "Trends und Perspektiven der Energieforschung"," Wuppertal Reports 13.2, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.
    3. Meyer, Bernd & Ahlert, Gerd, 2019. "Imperfect Markets and the Properties of Macro-economic-environmental Models as Tools for Policy Evaluation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 80-87.
    4. Elberry, Ahmed M. & Garaffa, Rafael & Faaij, André & van der Zwaan, Bob, 2024. "A review of macroeconomic modelling tools for analysing industrial transformation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    5. Vrontisi, Zoi & Charalampidis, Ioannis & Paroussos, Leonidas, 2020. "What are the impacts of climate policies on trade? A quantified assessment of the Paris Agreement for the G20 economies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    6. Christian Lutz & Bernd Meyer & Marc Ingo Wolter, 2010. "The global multisector/multicountry 3-E model GINFORS. A description of the model and a baseline forecast for global energy demand and CO 2 emissions," International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1/2), pages 25-45.
    7. Viebahn, Peter & Kobiela, Georg & Zelt, Ole & Wietschel, Martin & Hirzel, Simon & Horst, Juri & Hildebrand, Jan, 2018. "Technologien für die Energiewende: Kriterienraster. Teilbericht 1 zum Teilprojekt A im Rahmen des strategischen BMWi-Leitprojekts "Trends und Perspektiven der Energieforschung"," Wuppertal Reports 12, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.
    8. Viebahn, Peter (Ed.) & Zelt, Ole (Ed.) & Fischedick, Manfred (Ed.) & Wietschel, Martin (Ed.) & Hirzel, Simon (Ed.) & Horst, Juri (Ed.), 2018. "Technologien für die Energiewende: Technologiebericht - Band 1. Teilbericht 2 zum Teilprojekt A im Rahmen des strategischen BMWi-Leitprojekts "Trends und Perspektiven der Energieforschung"," Wuppertal Reports 13.1, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.
    9. Jonathan Köhler & Fjalar de Haan & Georg Holtz & Klaus Kubeczko & Enayat Moallemi & George Papachristos & Emile Chappin, 2018. "Modelling Sustainability Transitions: An Assessment of Approaches and Challenges," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 21(1), pages 1-8.
    10. Aleh Cherp & Vadim Vinichenko & Jale Tosun & Joel A. Gordon & Jessica Jewell, 2021. "National growth dynamics of wind and solar power compared to the growth required for global climate targets," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 6(7), pages 742-754, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zoi Vrontisi & Ioannis Charalampidis & Ulrike Lehr & Mark Meyer & Leonidas Paroussos & Christian Lutz & Yen E. Lam-González & Anastasia Arabadzhyan & Matías M. González & Carmelo J. León, 2022. "Macroeconomic impacts of climate change on the Blue Economy sectors of southern European islands," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 170(3), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Max Pargmann & Jan Ebert & Markus Götz & Daniel Maldonado Quinto & Robert Pitz-Paal & Stefan Kesselheim, 2024. "Automatic heliostat learning for in situ concentrating solar power plant metrology with differentiable ray tracing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Johannes Reinhard Többen & Martin Distelkamp & Britta Stöver & Saskia Reuschel & Lara Ahmann & Christian Lutz, 2022. "Global Land Use Impacts of Bioeconomy: An Econometric Input–Output Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Mariya Aleksynska & Giovanni Peri, 2014. "Isolating the Network Effect of Immigrants on Trade," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 434-455, March.
    5. Anthony Briant & Pierre-Philippe Combes & Miren Lafourcade, 2014. "Product Complexity, Quality of Institutions and the Protrade Effect of Immigrants," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 63-85, January.
    6. Oh, Chang Hoon & Travis Selmier, W. & Lien, Donald, 2011. "International trade, foreign direct investment, and transaction costs in languages," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 732-735.
    7. Amelie Guillin & Isabelle Rabaud & Chahir Zaki, 2023. "Does the depth of trade agreements matter for trade in services?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(12), pages 3616-3653, December.
    8. Thomas L. Vollrath & Mark J. Gehlhar & Charles B. Hallahan, 2009. "Bilateral Import Protection, Free Trade Agreements, and Other Factors Influencing Trade Flows in Agriculture and Clothing," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 298-317, June.
    9. Edmond Noubissi & Boker Poumie & Hilaire Nkengfack, 2021. "Effect of environmental policies on exports from sub‐Saharan African countries," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 33(4), pages 688-702, December.
    10. Beestermöller, Matthias, 2017. "Striking Evidence? Demand Persistence for Inter-City Buses from German Railway Strikes," Discussion Papers in Economics 31768, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    11. Luis Marcelo Florensa & Laura M uez-Ramos & Inmaculada Mart󹑺-Zarzoso & Mar𨁌uisa Recalde, 2015. "Regional versus global production networks: where does Latin America stand?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(37), pages 3938-3956, August.
    12. Michele Fratianni & Francesco Marchionne, 2011. "The Limits to Integration," Chapters, in: Miroslav N. Jovanović (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume I, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Jingyuan Hou & Zhonghai Cheng & Xinshu Gong, 2022. "The Effect of Exports and Two-Way Foreign Direct Investment between China and Pan-East Asian Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Joras Ferwerda & Mark Kattenberg & Han-Hsin Chang & Brigitte Unger & Loek Groot & Jacob A. Bikker, 2013. "Gravity models of trade-based money laundering," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(22), pages 3170-3182, August.
    15. Peter Egger & Douglas Nelson, 2011. "How Bad Is Antidumping? Evidence from Panel Data," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 93(4), pages 1374-1390, November.
    16. Iván Fernández-Val & Martin Weidner, 2018. "Fixed Effects Estimation of Large-TPanel Data Models," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 10(1), pages 109-138, August.
    17. Erik Marel & Ben Shepherd, 2013. "Services Trade, Regulation and Regional Integration: Evidence from Sectoral Data," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(11), pages 1393-1405, November.
    18. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2009-020 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Redding, Stephen J. & Weinstein, David E., 2016. "A unified approach to estimating demand and welfare," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 67681, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Marc Flandreau & Mathilde Maurel, 2005. "Monetary Union, Trade Integration, and Business Cycles in 19th Century Europe," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 135-152, April.
    21. Laurent Didier, 2017. "South-South Trade and Geographical Diversification of Intra-SSA Trade: Evidence from BRICs," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 29(2), pages 139-154, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10482-:d:1532913. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.